Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Vredestein Ultrac
The data shows a clear pattern: the Falken tends to deliver stronger objective braking and lap-time performance in both dry and wet, while the Vredestein counters with superior refinement, comfort, and aquaplaning security in curves. If you value crisp handling and short stops, the Falken stands out; if you prioritize quietness and plush ride with more composed wet balance, the Vredestein makes a compelling case.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Ultrac | one | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac is better than the Falken ZIEX ZE320 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Shortest dry and wet braking in both tests
- Fastest or near-fastest dry and wet handling times
- Very low cabin noise in one test with strong overall refinement
- Slight efficiency edge in one rolling resistance result
- Class-leading refinement: lowest noise and excellent ride comfort
- Stronger curved aquaplaning performance and more predictable wet balance
- Fine steering feel with stable motorway manners
- Competitive rolling resistance and straight-line aquaplaning
Dry Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 stopped the vehicle in 2.69% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Dry Braking: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was 1.19% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 scored 8.11% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 stopped the vehicle in 0.83% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Wet Braking: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac was 0.22% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac scored 5.56% more points than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac floated at a 0.69% higher speed than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac slipped out at a 10.98% higher speed than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac scored 5.26% more points than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 scored 20% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Subj. Noise: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac measured 0.42% quieter than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac had a 0.63% lower rolling resistance than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Falken ZIEX ZE320 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Falken ZIEX ZE320 highly for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and generally low noise, positioning it as a sporty-leaning touring tyre with good value. Comfort is praised by several users, though one hybrid owner reports intrusive high-pitch noise and a harsh, hollow feel. Wear feedback is mixed but limited: one mid-score review reports fast front wear, while others note early days or acceptable longevity. A few note increased fuel consumption versus competitors, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.
Based on 7 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Vredestein Ultrac Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Vredestein Ultrac highly, praising its confident wet grip (including aquaplaning resistance), solid dry performance, and comfortable, quiet ride. Handling is described as predictable and safe, with several noting good value versus premium rivals. A minority report faster-than-expected tread wear, and a few mention noise or steering feel, but these are less common. Overall sentiment skews positive given the high number of strong reviews.
Based on 23 reviews with an average rating of 77%
Conclusion
The Vredestein Ultrac trades a little outright pace for day-to-day polish: lower noise, better comfort, steadier wet balance, and stronger curved aquaplaning performance. While it can feel bouncy in the dry and lacks ultimate bite under braking, it's the calmer, more refined companion-especially suited to warmer climates and motorway use.
Bottom line: choose Falken for sharper control and consistently shorter stops; choose Vredestein for quieter, cushier miles and greater confidence in standing water.
Key Differences
- Braking: Falken consistently stops shorter in dry and wet (e.g., 34.21 m vs 34.43 m dry; 25.47 m vs 25.79 m wet).
- Handling pace: Falken quicker in dry and wet laps; Vredestein steadier but slower.
- Wet composure: Vredestein feels more predictable; Falken can feel uneasy in cool/wet and skittish at the limit.
- Aquaplaning: Vredestein clearly better in curved aquaplaning; straight-line aquaplaning is a wash.
- Refinement: Vredestein is quieter and more comfortable; Falken is sportier with slightly more noise in one test but very quiet in another.
- Efficiency: Rolling resistance essentially tied overall, with minor, test-dependent swings.
Overall Winner: Vredestein Ultrac
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Ultrac has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.