Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
The Falken frequently impressed in dry braking-twice stopping shorter than the Goodyear-and delivered a quiet, comfortable ride with engaging dynamics. The Goodyear, however, consistently proved stronger where it matters most for safety: wet braking, aquaplaning resistance, and all-round stability, while delivering standout tread life and lower cost per 1000 km. One outlier test noted cool-wet shortcomings for the Goodyear, but the broader data set still favors it in wet and value metrics.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | three |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Falken ZIEX ZE320 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading dry braking in two tests (up to ~3% shorter than Goodyear)
- Engaging, confidence-inspiring dry dynamics
- Quiet and comfortable ride in comparative scoring
- Competitive rolling resistance in some tests
- Consistently superior wet braking (wins 3/3) and strong aquaplaning resistance
- Balanced, precise handling with strong dry pace
- Outstanding tread life (~54,000 km) and best cost per 1000 km
- Low rolling resistance and generally quiet operation
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 stopped the vehicle in 1.95% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.24% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 3.75% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.76% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was 1.22% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.14% faster around a wet circle than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 0.82% higher speed than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 7.26% higher speed than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 scored 6% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE320 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE320 scored 20% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Noise: Falken ZIEX ZE320
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 1.11% quieter than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 34.25% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 36.39% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 0.12% lower rolling resistance than the Falken ZIEX ZE320.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Falken ZIEX ZE320 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Falken ZIEX ZE320 highly for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and generally low noise, positioning it as a sporty-leaning touring tyre with good value. Comfort is praised by several users, though one hybrid owner reports intrusive high-pitch noise and a harsh, hollow feel. Wear feedback is mixed but limited: one mid-score review reports fast front wear, while others note early days or acceptable longevity. A few note increased fuel consumption versus competitors, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.
Based on 7 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across 160 driver reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely praised for outstanding dry and wet grip, progressive and predictable handling, strong braking, and a surprisingly comfortable, quiet ride for a UHP tyre. Many users report improved confidence and everyday refinement versus previous tyres (including PS4/PS5, PZ4, and various runflats), with good value for money also noted. Minority complaints focus on faster wear and relatively low new tread depth, increased noise on rough asphalt, and a softer sidewall feel that can dull initial turn-in or feel floaty at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused daily use.
Based on 173 reviews with an average rating of 86%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the more rounded, safety-first choice. It won all three shared tests overall, led every wet braking contest by around 3-4%, showed stronger aquaplaning margins, and posted exceptional tread life (~54,000 km) and best-in-test value (€6.66/1000 km). While one test flagged cool-wet inconsistency, the aggregate results and durability advantage make the Goodyear the clear pick for mixed-weather summers, performance driving, and cost-conscious high-mileage users.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Goodyear won all 3 shared tests; Falken had none
- Wet braking: Goodyear faster by ~3-4% across tests
- Dry braking: Falken stopped shorter in 2 of 3 tests
- Aquaplaning: Goodyear led straight and curved metrics
- Wear and value: Goodyear ~52% longer mileage and ~36% better €/1000 km
- Comfort/noise: Falken scored higher for ride and subjective quiet in comparisons
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.