Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/50 R18
Tyres tested
10
Disciplines
13
Test vehicle
VW T-Roc R

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
34.2 m -1.40 m 0 km/h
35.6 m Best 0 km/h
36.8 m +1.20 m 23 km/h
36.9 m +1.30 m 24 km/h
37.3 m +1.70 m 28 km/h
37.8 m +2.20 m 31 km/h
38.6 m +3.00 m 36 km/h
39 m +3.40 m 38 km/h
39.1 m +3.50 m 39 km/h
39.2 m +3.60 m 39 km/h
RefReference Winter
40.3 m +4.70 m 44 km/h
40.4 m +4.80 m 45 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 18.1% (6.2 m ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S would still be travelling at 45 km/h when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
104.5 km/h +0.90 km/h
103.6 km/h Best
103.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
102.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
102.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
102.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
102.6 km/h -1.00 km/h
102.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
RefReference Winter
101.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
101.4 km/h -2.20 km/h
101.3 km/h -2.30 km/h
99.6 km/h -4.00 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (4.9 Km/H).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
39.87 m -3.80 m 0 km/h
43.67 m Best 0 km/h
43.94 m +0.27 m 10 km/h
44.65 m +0.98 m 19 km/h
45.2 m +1.53 m 24 km/h
45.77 m +2.10 m 28 km/h
RefReference Winter
46.99 m +3.32 m 35 km/h
46.99 m +3.32 m 35 km/h
48.76 m +5.09 m 42 km/h
48.87 m +5.20 m 42 km/h
48.98 m +5.31 m 43 km/h
54.99 m +11.32 m 59 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 37.9% (15.12 m ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S would still be travelling at 59 km/h when the Linglong Sport Master 4S had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
82 km/h +2.00 km/h
80 km/h Best
78.7 km/h -1.30 km/h
78.3 km/h -1.70 km/h
78.3 km/h -1.70 km/h
78.1 km/h -1.90 km/h
77.8 km/h -2.20 km/h
RefReference Winter
77.5 km/h -2.50 km/h
77.1 km/h -2.90 km/h
77 km/h -3.00 km/h
76.7 km/h -3.30 km/h
72.1 km/h -7.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (9.9 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
81.15 km/h Best
RefReference Winter
80.35 km/h -0.80 km/h
80.05 km/h -1.10 km/h
RefReference Summer
79.98 km/h -1.17 km/h
79.9 km/h -1.25 km/h
79.54 km/h -1.61 km/h
79.36 km/h -1.79 km/h
79.32 km/h -1.83 km/h
78.18 km/h -2.97 km/h
77.39 km/h -3.76 km/h
75.26 km/h -5.89 km/h
72.39 km/h -8.76 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (8.76 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.07 m/sec2 Best
3.06 m/sec2 -0.01 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
3.02 m/sec2 -0.05 m/sec2
2.96 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
2.96 m/sec2 -0.11 m/sec2
2.94 m/sec2 -0.13 m/sec2
RefReference Winter
2.86 m/sec2 -0.21 m/sec2
2.86 m/sec2 -0.21 m/sec2
2.82 m/sec2 -0.25 m/sec2
2.68 m/sec2 -0.39 m/sec2
2.63 m/sec2 -0.44 m/sec2
2.55 m/sec2 -0.52 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (0.52 m/sec2).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
22.6 m -0.80 m 0 km/h
23.4 m Best 0 km/h
23.8 m +0.40 m 17 km/h
24.2 m +0.80 m 24 km/h
24.3 m +0.90 m 25 km/h
24.4 m +1.00 m 26 km/h
24.6 m +1.20 m 29 km/h
25.2 m +1.80 m 35 km/h
25.3 m +1.90 m 36 km/h
27 m +3.60 m 47 km/h
28 m +4.60 m 53 km/h
RefReference Summer
47 m +23.60 m 92 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 108% (24.4 m ≈ 5.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Linglong Sport Master 4S would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the Kleber Quadraxer SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
3084.1 N +115.70 N
2968.4 N Best
2953.5 N -14.90 N
2917.9 N -50.50 N
2909 N -59.40 N
2873.4 N -95.00 N
2849.6 N -118.80 N
2849.6 N -118.80 N
2825.9 N -142.50 N
2546.9 N -421.50 N
2514.2 N -454.20 N
RefReference Summer
1642 N -1,326.40 N

The difference between best and worst was 46.8% (1,442.1 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
60.71 km/h +0.48 km/h
60.23 km/h Best
60.23 km/h Best
59.93 km/h -0.30 km/h
59.57 km/h -0.66 km/h
59.45 km/h -0.78 km/h
57.78 km/h -2.45 km/h
57.72 km/h -2.51 km/h
57.6 km/h -2.63 km/h
57.24 km/h -2.99 km/h
55.08 km/h -5.15 km/h
RefReference Summer
36 km/h -24.23 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 40.7% (24.71 Km/H).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
4.57 m/sec2 +0.14 m/sec2
4.43 m/sec2 Best
4.42 m/sec2 -0.01 m/sec2
4.36 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
4.28 m/sec2 -0.15 m/sec2
4.27 m/sec2 -0.16 m/sec2
4.2 m/sec2 -0.23 m/sec2
4.19 m/sec2 -0.24 m/sec2
4.14 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
4.04 m/sec2 -0.39 m/sec2
4 m/sec2 -0.43 m/sec2
RefReference Summer
1.98 m/sec2 -2.45 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 56.7% (2.59 m/sec2).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points
6.7 Points -1.30 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (1.3 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.14 dB Best
72.58 dB +0.44 dB
RefReference Winter
72.66 dB +0.52 dB
72.73 dB +0.59 dB
72.82 dB +0.68 dB
73.04 dB +0.90 dB
73.05 dB +0.91 dB
73.06 dB +0.92 dB
73.28 dB +1.14 dB
RefReference Summer
73.61 dB +1.47 dB
73.67 dB +1.53 dB
73.97 dB +1.83 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.53 kg/t Best £0
7.88 kg/t +0.35 kg/t £20
RefReference Summer
8.13 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £35
8.17 kg/t +0.64 kg/t £37
8.2 kg/t +0.67 kg/t £39
RefReference Winter
8.38 kg/t +0.85 kg/t £50
8.41 kg/t +0.88 kg/t £52
8.48 kg/t +0.95 kg/t £56
8.79 kg/t +1.26 kg/t £74
8.83 kg/t +1.30 kg/t £76
8.93 kg/t +1.40 kg/t £82
9.37 kg/t +1.84 kg/t £108

The difference between best and worst was 24.4% (1.84 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV uses about 74 L (£108) more fuel than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.