Menu

Test Charts / TUV

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy vs Pilot Sport 5: How Much Do You Really Give Up?

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
255/40 R20
Tyres tested
2
Disciplines
5
Test vehicle
Tesla Model Y

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
34.8 m Best 0 km/h
35.1 m +0.30 m 12 km/h

All the tyres in the Dry Braking test finished less than 3% apart. From 130 km/h, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 would still be travelling at 12 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

2

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 20 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
25.6 m Best 0 km/h
27.8 m +2.20 m 37 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (2.2 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy would still be travelling at 37 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
TyreResultGap to best
8.92 Points Best
8 Points -0.92 Points

The difference between best and worst was 10.3% (0.92 Points).

Value

2

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.5 kg/t Best £0
7.9 kg/t +1.40 kg/t £95

The difference between best and worst was 21.5% (1.4 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 uses about 65 L (£95) more fuel than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Energy.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Total weight loss after wear test in grams

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
TyreResultGap to best
901 g Best
1138 g +237.00 g

The difference between best and worst was 26.3% (237 g).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 20 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.