BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Vredestein Quatrac
Yet the story isn't one-sided. The BFGoodrich repeatedly delivers strong dry-braking and notably robust snow results, alongside efficiency advantages in rolling resistance and fuel use. The Quatrac counters with class-leading wet braking and handling, better aquaplaning margins, lower noise, and longer wear-traits that matter for year-round safety and value.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac | five |
While it might look like the Vredestein Quatrac is better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently strong on snow (traction, braking, handling, slalom wins across tests)
- Shorter dry-braking distances in most sizes tested (e.g., 3-3.5% advantage)
- Lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption
- Good aquaplaning reserves; competitive straight/curved aquaplaning in some sizes
- Outstanding wet braking and handling (e.g., 6-14% shorter wet stops, quickest wet laps)
- Balanced, sporty handling with direct steering and high aquaplaning reserves
- Longer tread life and lower noise
- Stronger overall value proposition; consistent overall test wins
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during four dry braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 2.33% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Dry Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 0.43% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac stopped the vehicle in 6.97% less distance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 5.75% faster around a wet lap than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac was 4.69% faster around a wet circle than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season floated at a 0.71% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Straight Aqua: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac slipped out at a 1.84% higher speed than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 1.06% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Snow Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow traction tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had 4.64% better snow traction than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Snow Traction: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 1.61% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 7.49% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Snow Slalom: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two noise tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac measured 0.34% quieter than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tyre Weight
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season weighed 3.29% less than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Tyre Weight: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two wear tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac is predicted to cover 8.64% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wear: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac was better during two value tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac proved to have a 18.1% better value based on price/1000km than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Value: Vredestein Quatrac
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had a 5.86% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Rolling Resistance: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season used 3.55% less fuel than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Fuel Consumption: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one abrasion tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season lost 8.97% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Quatrac.
Best In Abrasion: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Vredestein Quatrac.
In total the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.
The Vredestein Quatrac has been reviewed 28 times and drivers have given the tyre 82% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Vredestein Quatrac.
View all BFGoodrich Advantage All Season driver reviews >>
Conclusion
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season makes a solid case where it counts for winter and efficiency-minded drivers: repeatedly shorter dry stops, consistently better snow traction/braking/handling, lower rolling resistance, and slightly reduced fuel consumption. If your climate leans wet most of the year, the Quatrac's safety margin is compelling. If you face regular light-to-moderate snow and value efficiency, the BFGoodrich is a savvy, balanced alternative.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Quatrac wins all 5 shared tests; BFGoodrich none
- Wet safety: Quatrac markedly shorter wet-braking (up to ~14%) and faster wet handling
- Dry braking: BFGoodrich typically stops shorter by ~3%
- Snow performance: BFGoodrich leads in traction, braking, and handling on snow
- Efficiency: BFGoodrich has lower rolling resistance and marginally better fuel economy
- Longevity and comfort: Quatrac wears longer (+7-12%) and runs slightly quieter
Overall Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.