Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
Across dry, wet, snow and efficiency metrics, the Continental repeatedly finishes near the top, with standout aquaplaning resistance and notably lower rolling resistance. Vredestein counters with quieter operation and flashes of strong wet braking, but shows weaker precision on dry roads and average winter capability compared with the class leaders.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | seven |
While it might look like the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is better than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading balance with top-3 results across most tests
- Consistently shorter dry, wet, and snow braking distances
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
- Low rolling resistance with strong wear/abrasion results
- Quietest operation in most tests
- Good wet grip with occasional wet-braking wins
- Comfortable ride and stable everyday manners
- Strong value proposition versus premium rivals
Dry Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during seven dry braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 4.45% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.32% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.01% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 11.11% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.01% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 1.53% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.27% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.11% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.68% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 5.26% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.21% faster around a wet circle than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 floated at a 2.74% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during five curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 slipped out at a 8.2% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 4.48% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 accelerated 11.04% faster than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during five snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had 7.06% better snow traction than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 2.77% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 4.49% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 11.11% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 provided 9.09% more lateral grip than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 9.12% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Slalom: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle 6.81% shorter than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Ice Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Ice Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one ice traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 accelerated 3.29% faster than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Ice Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 5.21% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during six noise tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus measured 0.74% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is predicted to cover 3.53% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wear: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus proved to have a 7.14% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Value: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had a 15.42% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 used 1.72% less fuel than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 emitted 14.1% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Abrasion: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its excellent wet grip and braking, quiet and comfortable ride, and balanced performance across seasons, including competent snow traction. Many high-scoring reviews also note strong longevity and good efficiency/low rolling resistance. The main drawbacks reported by a noticeable minority are a softer sidewall feel with vague/less precise steering (especially in warm, dry conditions or at higher speeds) and some mixed reports of faster front-axle wear. Overall, it's a confident, well-rounded choice for mild climates and everyday driving.
Based on 45 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus report strong all-season capability with confident wet and snow traction, good high-speed stability, and a quiet, comfortable ride. Many found grip reliable across typical daily and motorway use, including winter trips, with several noting solid performance even in heat. A recurring criticism is a softer sidewall that can feel squishy and reduce steering precision, and a few mention slightly weaker dry cornering limits in hot conditions versus dedicated summer tyres. Overall sentiment is notably positive with the negatives being minority concerns.
Based on 10 reviews with an average rating of 82%
Although I didn't get to drive them in winter temps yet, they seem to stick to the road very well for summer driving. They felt planted at speeds up to 120 mph (didn't take them further than that so can't tell), but a little slippery in corner acceleration on twisty roads, particularly on hot tarmac.
I am... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
Vredestein's Quatrac Pro Plus offers credible wet performance, high ride comfort and the quieter cabin many commuters value, typically at a lower purchase price. However, its longer dry stops, softer steering precision and average winter metrics make it less confidence-inspiring in mixed or severe weather. If you prioritise all-round safety and efficiency, choose the Continental; if budget and cabin quiet take precedence in a milder climate, the Vredestein remains a sensible, comfortable option.
Key Differences
- Continental ranks higher overall in all 7 shared tests (including multiple test wins).
- Dry safety: Continental consistently stops shorter (e.g., 5%+ advantage in several tests).
- Winter capability: Continental leads in snow/ice braking, traction and handling across tests.
- Aquaplaning: Continental shows stronger straight and curved aquaplaning resistance.
- Efficiency: Continental's rolling resistance is ~14-16% lower in many tests; better fuel use and abrasion.
- Refinement/price: Vredestein is generally quieter and cheaper, but with softer steering precision on dry.
Overall Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.