Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
Drivers will see a clear philosophy split. The CrossClimate 2 delivers benchmark snow traction, shorter dry stops, strong aquaplaning resistance, and low rolling resistance. The Quatrac Pro Plus prioritizes wet braking and handling-often topping Michelin in pure wet grip-though it trails in snow, dry braking, and fuel efficiency. If you face real winters, the gap becomes meaningful; in milder, rainy climates, Vredestein's strengths are more compelling.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | nine |
While it might look like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is better than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading snow performance (braking, traction, handling, and ice braking/traction)
- Shortest dry braking across all tests
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
- Low rolling resistance with strong wear/abrasion results
- Strong wet braking and wet handling performance
- Competitive wet-circle speeds and consistent wet grip
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride for the class
- Lower purchase price and solid value rating
Dry Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during nine dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 9.43% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.17% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 0.03% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 5.88% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus stopped the vehicle in 3.09% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.93% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus stopped the vehicle in 1.98% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was 2.05% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was 1.75% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 5.26% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was 1.05% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during seven straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 4% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 7% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during nine snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 6.99% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 11.3% faster than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 9% better snow traction than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 3.87% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 4.84% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 20% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 provided 15% more lateral grip than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 11.36% faster through a slalom than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle 11.33% shorter than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Ice Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Ice Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one ice traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 14.08% faster than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Ice Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored 8.3% more points than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during four noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.23% quieter than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is predicted to cover 2.11% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Wear: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus proved to have a 14.75% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Value: Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during seven rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 15% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 used 3.45% less fuel than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 32.05% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 largely report excellent all-weather confidence, with standout snow/ice traction, strong dry grip for an all-season, and comfortable, generally quiet cruising. Many note good tread life and stable performance over high mileages, with predictable handling and strong resistance to hydroplaning. A minority experienced inconsistent wet traction (especially on powerful RWD cars or as the tyre wears), more road noise on rough surfaces with age, and a small drop in fuel economy, and several mention the premium price. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for a do-it-all tyre.
Based on 140 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus report strong all-season capability with confident wet and snow traction, good high-speed stability, and a quiet, comfortable ride. Many found grip reliable across typical daily and motorway use, including winter trips, with several noting solid performance even in heat. A recurring criticism is a softer sidewall that can feel squishy and reduce steering precision, and a few mention slightly weaker dry cornering limits in hot conditions versus dedicated summer tyres. Overall sentiment is notably positive with the negatives being minority concerns.
Based on 10 reviews with an average rating of 82%
Although I didn't get to drive them in winter temps yet, they seem to stick to the road very well for summer driving. They felt planted at speeds up to 120 mph (didn't take them further than that so can't tell), but a little slippery in corner acceleration on twisty roads, particularly on hot tarmac.
I am... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
Vredestein's case rests on confident wet grip and balanced manners on damp roads at a lower price, but it concedes too much in snow performance, dry stopping distances, and efficiency (rolling resistance) to overturn Michelin overall. For mixed climates with real winter episodes or anyone valuing all-round safety and economy, choose the CrossClimate 2. For predominantly mild, rainy regions where wet dynamics matter most and budget is tighter, the Quatrac Pro Plus is a sensible, mid-range alternative.
Key Differences
- Dry braking: Michelin consistently stops shorter (e.g., ~11% shorter in multiple tests)
- Wet grip: Vredestein often leads wet braking/handling, while Michelin leads aquaplaning safety
- Winter capability: Michelin is the clear snow/ice leader; Vredestein is mid-pack to weak on snow
- Efficiency: Michelin's rolling resistance is 10-20% lower in several tests, aiding fuel economy
- Wear and abrasion: Michelin shows better longevity and lower particle emissions
- Value positioning: Vredestein is cheaper with a better value score; Michelin commands a premium price
Overall Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.