Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Vredestein Ultrac
The context matters. In Auto Express (225/45 R17), Ultrac edged an overall win on consistency and low noise, with Goodyear dominating dry metrics. In Autobild's SUV test (255/55 R18), Goodyear won overall with clear wet and dry braking advantages, but Vredestein countered with better curved aquaplaning, lower noise, and lower rolling resistance. A mixed-condition 2025 comparison saw both criticised on cool-wet grip, with Goodyear still braking shorter yet posting the highest rolling resistance, while Vredestein offered slightly better wet handling balance and efficiency.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | one | |
| Vredestein Ultrac | two |
While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac is better than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently shorter dry and wet braking (e.g., −3% to −6% vs Ultrac in shared tests)
- Confident dry handling and steering precision; stable, understeer-led balance
- Strong wet pace with good safety reserves; test win in SUV size
- Broad competence across conditions with competitive rolling resistance for a max-performance tyre
- Lower rolling resistance in multiple tests (efficiency advantage)
- Lower external noise and better overall refinement/comfort
- Stronger aquaplaning security, notably in curved aquaplaning and wet circle
- Consistent, confidence-inspiring behaviour; strong overall wins on balance and value
Dry Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 4.14% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.57% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 11.11% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.15% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac was 1.15% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.69% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac scored 12.5% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac was 0.74% faster around a wet circle than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac floated at a 0.06% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac slipped out at a 5.47% higher speed than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Gravel Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac was 0.17% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>
Gravel Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac had 2.54% better traction on gravel than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Gravel Traction: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>
Sand Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac had 5.25% better traction in sand than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Sand Traction: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>
Grass Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 5.81% faster accelerating on grass than the Vredestein Ultrac.
Best In Grass Traction: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Vredestein Ultrac performed equally well in subj. noise tests.
Best In Subj. Noise: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during one noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac measured 1.72% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac had a 3.4% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across 160 driver reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely praised for outstanding dry and wet grip, progressive and predictable handling, strong braking, and a surprisingly comfortable, quiet ride for a UHP tyre. Many users report improved confidence and everyday refinement versus previous tyres (including PS4/PS5, PZ4, and various runflats), with good value for money also noted. Minority complaints focus on faster wear and relatively low new tread depth, increased noise on rough asphalt, and a softer sidewall feel that can dull initial turn-in or feel floaty at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused daily use.
Based on 173 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Vredestein Ultrac Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Vredestein Ultrac highly, praising its confident wet grip (including aquaplaning resistance), solid dry performance, and comfortable, quiet ride. Handling is described as predictable and safe, with several noting good value versus premium rivals. A minority report faster-than-expected tread wear, and a few mention noise or steering feel, but these are less common. Overall sentiment skews positive given the high number of strong reviews.
Based on 23 reviews with an average rating of 77%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
For drivers prioritising outright safety margins in stopping distances and crisp steering-spirited B-roads, emergency stops, or heavy, fast SUVs-the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the safer bet. For those valuing quietness, comfort and fuel economy with stable wet balance and strong aquaplaning resistance-commuting, motorway mileage, warmer climates-the Ultrac offers excellent value and fewer compromises day to day. The practical takeaway: choose Goodyear for maximum braking and dry precision, choose Vredestein for refinement and efficiency without major dynamic trade-offs.
Key Differences
- Braking: Goodyear stops shorter in dry and wet across shared tests (e.g., −4.9% dry, −3.6% to −6.3% wet).
- Handling bias: Goodyear feels sharper on dry; Vredestein offers calmer wet balance.
- Aquaplaning: Vredestein leads curved aquaplaning and wet circle; Goodyear edges straight-line in one test.
- Efficiency and noise: Vredestein runs quieter with lower rolling resistance in all shared size/result pairs.
- SUV performance: Goodyear won the SUV test overall; Vredestein placed close behind with better refinement/efficiency.
- Value proposition: Ultrac typically priced mid-premium with strong overall scores; Goodyear commands a premium for braking and dynamics.
Overall Winner: Vredestein Ultrac
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Ultrac has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.