Michelin Alpin 6 vs Laufenn I Fit+
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Alpin 6 finished ahead 3 times and the I Fit+ once. The Alpin 6 was stronger in wet and comfort, the I Fit+ in snow.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Alpin 6
I Fit+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Alpin 6
I Fit+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Alpin 6
I Fit+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Alpin 6 85% from 35 reviews and the I Fit+ 91% from 4. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Alpin 6 | Gap | I Fit+ | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Level | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 45.9 | 0.2% | 46 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 137 | 1.2% | 138.7 | 0-1 |
| Wet Alpin 6 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 41.9 | 4.5% | 43.77 | 3-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 71.6 | 3% | 69.5 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.95 | 0.6% | 13.03 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 78 | 7.7% | 72.4 | 1-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.09 | 33.2% | 2.32 | 1-0 |
| Snow I Fit+ ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 29.1 | 1.7% | 28.6 | 0-2 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,862 | 1.4% | 2,823 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 56.6 | 1.6% | 57.5 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Alpin 6 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 70.9 | 0.5 dB | 71.4 | 1-0 |
| Value Level | ||||
| Wear km | 40,100 | 28.5% | 31,200 | 1-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.75 | 5.9% | 8.23 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2021 to 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Alpin 6 | Field | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P5 of 55 | P38 of 55 | |
| 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 20 | P20 of 20 | |
| 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 16 | P7 of 16 | |
| 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | P12 of 50 | P10 of 50 |
Alpin 6 vs I Fit+: your questions
Is the Michelin Alpin 6 or the Laufenn I Fit+ the better tyre?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Alpin 6 finished ahead 3 times and the I Fit+ once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Alpin 6 scores 9.1 and the I Fit+ 8.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Alpin 6 or the I Fit+?
The Alpin 6 led 7 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.5% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 1-1 between the Alpin 6 and the I Fit+.
Which is better in snow?
The I Fit+ led 3 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9/10 for the Alpin 6 and 9/10 for the I Fit+.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Alpin 6 85% from 35 reviews and the I Fit+ 91% from 4.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Alpin 6 is made in 42 sizes (15 to 20 inch) and the I Fit+ in 62 (13 to 19 inch). 21 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Alpin 6 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the I Fit+ C and D.
Which is the newer tyre?
The I Fit+ is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Alpin 6 in 2018. The Alpin 6 replaced the Michelin Alpin 5.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin Alpin 6
13-1 in 14 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Alpin 6
15-9 in 24 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Alpin 6
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Alpin 6
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Michelin Alpin 6 vs Vredestein Wintrac
7-2 in 10 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Michelin Alpin 6
2-6 in 8 shared tests
vs
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Alpin 6
1-12 in 13 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Michelin Alpin 6
3-16 in 20 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.