Viking Fourtech Plus vs Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
Ahead in each discipline
The Viking Fourtech Plus and the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 have met in one independent test so far, and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 finished ahead. The 4 SeasonDrive X5 was stronger in dry, wet and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Fourtech Plus
4 SeasonDrive X5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Fourtech Plus
4 SeasonDrive X5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Fourtech Plus | Gap | 4 SeasonDrive X5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry 4 SeasonDrive X5 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 41.6 | 8.2% | 38.2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 91.6 | 0.5% | 92.1 |
| Wet 4 SeasonDrive X5 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 61 | 1% | 60.4 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 80.5 | 1% | 81.3 |
| Wet Circle s | 16.47 | 1% | 16.31 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 77.1 | 3.8% | 74.3 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.17 | 32.1% | 2.4 |
| Snow Level | |||
| Snow Braking m | 23 | 8% | 25 |
| Snow Traction N | 3,457 | 4.2% | 3,317 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 98.6 | 1.4% | 100 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.86 | 0.8% | 3.89 |
| Comfort Level | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 7 | 4.3% | 7.3 |
| Noise dB | 72.4 | 1.3 dB | 73.7 |
| Value 4 SeasonDrive X5 ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.82 | 4.9% | 7.44 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Fourtech Plus | Field | 4 SeasonDrive X5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test | P9 of 11 | P3 of 11 |
Fourtech Plus vs 4 SeasonDrive X5: your questions
Is the Viking Fourtech Plus or the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 the better tyre?
The Viking Fourtech Plus and the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 have met in one independent test so far, and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Fourtech Plus scores 8.2 and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Fourtech Plus or the 4 SeasonDrive X5?
The 4 SeasonDrive X5 led 3 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The 4 SeasonDrive X5 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 2-2 between the Fourtech Plus and the 4 SeasonDrive X5.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9/10 for the Fourtech Plus and 8/10 for the 4 SeasonDrive X5.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1 reviews and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 87% from 1.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
0-1 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Linglong Sport Master 4S vs Viking Fourtech Plus
1-1 in 2 shared tests
vs
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
5-0 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.