Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Linglong Sport Master 4S
Ahead in each discipline
The Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Linglong Sport Master 4S have met in one independent test so far, and the G Fit 4S finished ahead. The G Fit 4S was stronger in wet, snow and value, the Sport Master 4S in dry and comfort.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
G Fit 4S
Sport Master 4S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
G Fit 4S
Sport Master 4S
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | G Fit 4S | Gap | Sport Master 4S |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Sport Master 4S ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 42.1 | 9.3% | 38.2 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 100.7 | 0.2% | 100.9 |
| Wet G Fit 4S ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 45.8 | 3.6% | 47.5 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 74.7 | 6.1% | 70.4 |
| Wet Circle s | 11.81 | 3.2% | 12.2 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 72 | 1.6% | 70.9 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.71 | 1.1% | 2.68 |
| Snow G Fit 4S ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 24.2 | 19.1% | 29.9 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,725 | 9.8% | 2,481 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 51.2 | 3.6% | 49.4 |
| Snow Circle ms/2 | 3.5 | 4.8% | 3.34 |
| Comfort Sport Master 4S ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 75.5 | 2.4 dB | 73.1 |
| Value G Fit 4S ahead | |||
| Wear km | 54,950 | 23.6% | 44,450 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.08 | 5% | 9.56 |
| Abrasion g | 978 | 6.1% | 1,041 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | G Fit 4S | Field | Sport Master 4S |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P10 of 15 | P14 of 15 |
G Fit 4S vs Sport Master 4S: your questions
Is the Laufenn G Fit 4S or the Linglong Sport Master 4S the better tyre?
The Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Linglong Sport Master 4S have met in one independent test so far, and the G Fit 4S finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the G Fit 4S scores 9 and the Sport Master 4S 8.7 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the G Fit 4S or the Sport Master 4S?
The G Fit 4S led 5 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Sport Master 4S led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The G Fit 4S led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the G Fit 4S 88% from 9 reviews; the Sport Master 4S has no owner reviews yet.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The G Fit 4S is made in 78 sizes (13 to 20 inch) and the Sport Master 4S in 60 (13 to 19 inch). 52 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the G Fit 4S is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Sport Master 4S B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S
4-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs
Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Linglong Sport Master 4S vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S
8-0 in 8 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Linglong Sport Master 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
0-4 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Linglong Sport Master 4S vs Viking Fourtech Plus
1-1 in 2 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.