Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Linglong Sport Master 4S

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | four |
While it might look like the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is better than the Linglong Sport Master 4S purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding snow performance (often winter-tyre levels) in braking, traction and handling
- Best-in-test aquaplaning resistance (straight and often curved)
- Low noise and high comfort
- Lower rolling resistance with better wear/abrasion results
- Class-leading dry handling pace and strong dry braking
- Competent wet braking/handling for the price
- Attractive purchase price/value score advantage
- Good ride comfort; stable everyday manners in mild climates
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S stopped the vehicle in 2.88% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Dry Braking: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 0.73% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 1.57% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S scored 10% more points than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S stopped the vehicle in 3.54% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Braking: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.22% faster around a wet lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 1.61% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 11.11% more points than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S was 2.31% faster around a wet circle than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Circle: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 floated at a 6.38% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 slipped out at a 25% higher speed than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 12.5% less distance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 accelerated 4.39% faster than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Traction: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had 11.41% better snow traction than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Traction: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 4.63% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 6.26% faster around a lap than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 10% more points than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 provided 10.22% more lateral grip than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Circle: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.27% faster through a slalom than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Snow Slalom: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S scored 0.2% more points than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four noise tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 measured 0.98% quieter than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Noise: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is predicted to cover 12.41% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Wear: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Linglong Sport Master 4S was better during one value tests. On average the Linglong Sport Master 4S proved to have a 17.71% better value based on price/1000km than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Value: Linglong Sport Master 4S
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had a 11.04% lower rolling resistance than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 lost 13.26% less particle wear matter than the Linglong Sport Master 4S.
Best In Abrasion: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Linglong Sport Master 4S.
In total the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has been reviewed 24 times and drivers have given the tyre 87% overall.
The Linglong Sport Master 4S has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Motorway driving is on par with many other tyres; the wind noise coming from the car is always louder than the tyres themselves, so no trouble there; you get just a wee bit less fuel efficiency overall (compared to the more expensive choice), but it is nothing to transcendental, on the dry they... Continue reading this review using the link below
View all Linglong Sport Master 4S driver reviews >>
Conclusion
Key Differences
- Snow: Kleber consistently stops shorter (e.g., −15% at 225/40 R18) and handles faster; Linglong lags notably in winter metrics
- Aquaplaning: Kleber has markedly higher straight-line aquaplaning speeds (often +7-10%); Linglong trails
- Dry dynamics: Linglong is faster in dry handling across all tests and often brakes shorter; Kleber is adequate but not sporty
- Wet balance: Linglong usually wins wet braking; Kleber can feel weaker laterally but occasionally scores better in wet handling laps
- Efficiency and longevity: Kleber has lower rolling resistance (up to ~19% advantage) and better wear/abrasion results
- Noise/comfort: Both comfortable, but Kleber is consistently quieter
Overall Winner: Kleber Quadraxer 3
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.