Menu

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3

This head-to-head pits two proven all-season tourers with different design priorities: the Hankook Kinergy 4S2, a premium-leaning all-rounder, versus the Kleber Quadraxer 3, Michelin's value sub-brand with a winter-first tune. Across nine shared tests from 2022-2025, the Hankook consistently finishes higher overall (6 test wins vs. 3) thanks to confident wet grip and incisive handling, while the Kleber repeatedly shines in snow, comfort, noise, and straight-line aquaplaning.

Expect the Hankook to feel sharper and stop shorter in the wet, with stronger lap times on wet and dry handling tracks. The Kleber counters with shorter dry braking in most tests, excellent snow traction/handling, lower noise, and typically better aquaplaning margins-albeit with a penalty in wet cornering confidence and rolling resistance.
Kinergy-4S2 VS Quadraxer-3

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of nine total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Hankook Kinergy 4S2six
six wins
Kleber Quadraxer 3three
three wins

While it might look like the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is better than the Kleber Quadraxer 3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading wet handling and strong wet braking across tests
  • Sharp, predictable steering and dry/wet lap consistency
  • Often better wear and overall value (lower cost per 1,000 km)
  • Competitive comfort with generally lower rolling resistance than Kleber in some tests
  • Outstanding snow traction, handling, and braking (winter-leaning performance)
  • Shorter dry braking in most tests
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Excellent straight-line aquaplaning resistance

Dry Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during nine dry braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 4.44% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
40.73M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
38.92M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.1M (+1.8M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
40.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.1M (+1.8M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
40.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
39.79M (+1.21M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
38.58M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.3M (+3M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
38.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.3M (+3M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
38.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
37.5M (+0.3M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
37.2M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.3M (+2M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
39.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
39.3M (+0.9M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
38.4M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.9M (+2.3M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
39.6M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 1.97% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.45s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81.05s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75.4s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
76.6s (+1.2s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
83.5s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
85.5s (+2s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during four dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.81% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
93.36Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
92.6Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
93.3Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
92.3Km/H (-1Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
87.8Km/H (-1.4Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89.2Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100.3Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
99Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
93.3Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
91.8Km/H (-1.5Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
92.1Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
90.7Km/H (-1.4Km/H)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 8% more points than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
92 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
92 Points (-8 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 stopped the vehicle in 2.18% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
47.08M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
48.13M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
48M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
49.4M (+1.4M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
48M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
49.4M (+1.4M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
29.56M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
30.43M (+0.87M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.5M (+1M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
48.5M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.5M (+1M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
48.5M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
43M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
46.1M (+3.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.2M (+1.3M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
47.9M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
62.4M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
65.1M (+2.7M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
44.6M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
47.8M (+3.2M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 2.3% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.72s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81.6s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
59.53s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
60.39s (+0.86s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
99.9s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
102.8s (+2.9s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during five wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 2.61% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
74.42Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72.48Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.7Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70.9Km/H (-1.8Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.1Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70.9Km/H (-1.2Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.4Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70.2Km/H (-2.2Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.9Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77.5Km/H (-2.4Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72.9Km/H (-2.1Km/H)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 8.16% more points than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
98 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
90 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
98 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
90 Points (-8 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during five wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 2.33% faster around a wet circle than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
13.81s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
14.14s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12.23s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
12.23s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11.94s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
12.07s (+0.13s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
16s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
16.4s (+0.4s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12.03s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
12.57s (+0.54s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
16.34s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
16.51s (+0.17s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
14.34s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
15.05s (+0.71s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during seven straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 floated at a 4.58% higher speed than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
77.49Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81.21Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
78.9Km/H (-4.7Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
83.6Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
88.5Km/H (-3.6Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
92.1Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
78.6Km/H (-1.8Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
80.4Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
76.9Km/H (-4.8Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81.7Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
70.1Km/H (-6.2Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
76.3Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73.5Km/H (-2.9Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
76.4Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75.9Km/H (-2.1Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 slipped out at a 0.68% higher speed than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.91m/sec2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2.93m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.29m/sec2 (-0.21m/sec2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3.5m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.58m/sec2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3.36m/sec2 (-0.22m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.83m/sec2 (-0.07m/sec2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2.9m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.57m/sec2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2.45m/sec2 (-0.12m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.3m/sec2 (-0.13m/sec2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2.43m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during five snow braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 0.34% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.83M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
23.75M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
27.7M (+0.1M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
27.6M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
19.52M (+0.47M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
19.05M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.1M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
23.2M (+0.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
25.5M (+0.6M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
24.9M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
24.1M
Kleber Quadraxer 3
25.3M (+1.2M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23M (+0.6M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
22.4M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.9M (+0.1M)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
23.8M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 accelerated 5.31% faster than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.03s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
5.71s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.03s (+0.32s)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
5.71s

Snow Traction

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during five snow traction tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had 2.65% better snow traction than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2756.17N
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2831.33N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2490N
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2422N (-68N)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2639N (-43N)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2682N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2562N (-125N)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2687N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2817N (-61N)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2878N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3367N (-144N)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3511N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2662N (-146N)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
2808N

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 4.71% faster around a lap than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.37s
Kleber Quadraxer 3
68.01s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
88.34s (+4.12s)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84.22s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
54.4s (+2.6s)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
51.8s

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.6% faster around a lap than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
64.14Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
65.18Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
57.4Km/H
Kleber Quadraxer 3
56.1Km/H (-1.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
57.3Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
57.6Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
51.6Km/H (-2Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
53.6Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100Km/H (-4.1Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
104.1Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
54.4Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
54.5Km/H

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 5% more points than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
95 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
100 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
95 Points (-5 Points)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
100 Points

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 provided 1.61% more lateral grip than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.66ms/2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3.72ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.66ms/2 (-0.06ms/2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3.72ms/2

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.73% faster through a slalom than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.97m/sec2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
4.04m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
4.31m/sec2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
4.24m/sec2 (-0.07m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
4.02m/sec2 (-0.06m/sec2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
4.08m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.67m/sec2 (-0.31m/sec2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3.98m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.94m/sec2
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3.69m/sec2 (-0.25m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.92m/sec2 (-0.28m/sec2)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
4.2m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 0.53% more points than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
31.83 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
32 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
98 Points (-2 Points)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
100 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
10 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8 Points (-2 Points)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.3 Points
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7 Points (-0.3 Points)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12 Points (-1 Points)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
13 Points

Noise

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four noise tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 measured 0.59% quieter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.2dB
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70.78dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.6dB
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72dB (+0.4dB)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73.1dB (+0.3dB)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72.8dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
68dB (+1dB)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
67dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73.3dB (+0.8dB)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72.5dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.8dB
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72.6dB (+0.8dB)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
69.4dB (+1.6dB)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
67.8dB

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two tyre weight tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 weighed 2.62% less than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
4092.7Kg
Kleber Quadraxer 3
3985.65Kg
Tyre Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tyre Weight: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8149Kg (+213Kg)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7936Kg
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
36.4Kg (+1.1Kg)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
35.3Kg

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is predicted to cover 11.3% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
54869.33KM
Kleber Quadraxer 3
48667.67KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
46219KM (-5025KM)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
51244KM
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
60289KM
Kleber Quadraxer 3
44009KM (-16280KM)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
58100KM
Kleber Quadraxer 3
50750KM (-7350KM)

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three value tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 proved to have a 15.19% better value based on price/1000km than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.37Price/1000
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8.69Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.76Price/1000
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8.88Price/1000 (+0.12Price/1000)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.47Price/1000
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8.71Price/1000 (+2.24Price/1000)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.88Price/1000
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8.47Price/1000 (+1.59Price/1000)

Price

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two price tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 cost 9.94% less than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
234.46
Kleber Quadraxer 3
260.35
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
405
Kleber Quadraxer 3
455 (+50)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
63.92
Kleber Quadraxer 3
65.69 (+1.77)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had a 5.26% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.18kg / t
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7.75kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.4kg / t (+0.56kg / t)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7.84kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8kg / t
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8.09kg / t (+0.09kg / t)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.24kg / t (+0.55kg / t)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7.69kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.02kg / t (+0.62kg / t)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7.4kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.31kg / t (+0.54kg / t)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7.77kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
7.51kg / t (+0.07kg / t)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
7.44kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.8kg / t (+0.8kg / t)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
8kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 used 2.28% less fuel than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.7l/100km
Kleber Quadraxer 3
5.57l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.65l/100km
Kleber Quadraxer 3
5.67l/100km (+0.02l/100km)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.74l/100km (+0.27l/100km)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
5.47l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 emitted 34.62% less particle wear matter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.4Gram/1000km
Kleber Quadraxer 3
15.3Gram/1000km
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (Gram/1000km), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.4Gram/1000km (+8.1Gram/1000km)
Kleber Quadraxer 3
15.3Gram/1000km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 lost 1.99% less particle wear matter than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
885g
Kleber Quadraxer 3
903g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
885g
Kleber Quadraxer 3
903g (+18g)

Real World Driver Reviews

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Driver Reviews

Most drivers rate the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 highly for everyday use, praising its strong wet grip (especially in cold rain), reassuring snow performance for an all-season, comfortable ride, and excellent value with often solid tread life. Across varied cars and climates, many report confident handling and balanced behavior in dry and wet conditions. Common drawbacks include noticeable road noise/whine at certain speeds and a softer handling feel with some understeer when pushed; several users also note that wet grip can decline once tread drops below ~4-5 mm. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with the tyre suiting mild-winter, rain-heavy climates particularly well.

Based on 59 reviews with an average rating of 75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3 Driver Reviews

Drivers rate the Kleber Quadraxer 3 very highly, praising its confident winter capability (snow and ice), excellent wet grip with strong aquaplaning resistance, and a quiet, comfortable ride. Many note solid dry performance for everyday driving, good longevity, and strong value compared to premium options like Michelin CrossClimate. A few isolated reviews mention high-speed noise or less inspiring dry grip versus previous models, but these are in the minority. Overall, it's viewed as a safe, refined, and durable all-season choice.

Based on 24 reviews with an average rating of 87%

Best Review for the Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Given 81% 205/55 R16 on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Very good all round tire
Helpful 1385 - tyre reviewed on August 20, 2020
View all Hankook Kinergy 4S2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Kleber Quadraxer 3
Given 77% 215/55 R17 on mostly country roads for 30,000 average miles
Kleber is part of the Michelin group, so it is easy to see how the technology found in the cross-climate has trickled down to this tyre. I currently drive a Suzuki Vitara 2019, and the bulk of my drive is done by the wife commuting and my two big trips a year from Scotland to Italy or Poland.
Motorway driving is on par with many other tyres; the wind noise coming from the car is always louder than the tyres themselves, so no trouble there; you get just a wee bit less fuel efficiency overall (compared to the more expensive choice), but it is nothing to transcendental, on the dry they... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1246 - tyre reviewed on June 2, 2025
View all Kleber Quadraxer 3 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Pattern-wise, Hankook owns the dynamic envelope in mixed weather: dominant in wet handling (7-0), strong in wet braking (6-3), and reliably quicker on dry/wet circuits. It often delivers better wear and value, making it the safer bet for rain-heavy climates and year-round commuting. Kleber is the snow specialist: it wins snow braking/traction/handling categories more often, pairs that with quiet comfort and secure straight-ahead aquaplaning, but trades off lateral wet grip and shows higher rolling resistance in several tests.

If you drive through frequent rain or prioritize precise, confidence-inspiring handling, choose the Hankook Kinergy 4S2. If your winters are long and snowy and you value calm, quiet cruising with strong aquaplaning reserves and short dry stops, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is compelling-especially on a budget. The practical takeaway: Hankook for balanced all-weather control and value; Kleber for winter-weighted security and comfort.
Key Differences
  • Wet cornering confidence: Hankook clearly ahead (wet handling 7-0, frequent wet lap wins).
  • Snow performance: Kleber leads in snow braking/traction/handling (aggregate wins 5/6/6).
  • Dry braking: Kleber typically stops shorter; Hankook counters with better dry handling feel.
  • Aquaplaning: Kleber stronger in straight-line aquaplaning; Hankook often better in curved.
  • Efficiency and wear: Hankook frequently shows better wear and value; Kleber often higher rolling resistance.
  • Noise/comfort: Kleber is generally quieter and plusher; Hankook is firmer but communicative.
Kleber Quadraxer 3

Overall Winner: Kleber Quadraxer 3

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.