Menu
Hankook Kinergy 4S View Gallery (2)
135-255/40-80 R13-18 98 sizes 2021 Winter rated

Hankook Kinergy 4S

The Hankook Kinergy 4S is a High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
76%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
68%
Wear
72%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
70%
Snow Grip
93%
Ice Grip
90%
13 Reviews
78% Average
144,500 miles driven
12 Tests (avg: 6th)
Hankook Kinergy 4S

Hankook Kinergy 4S

All Season Premium
BETA
7.4 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
80.6
1.38x / 6 tests
Dry
65.7
1.5x / 7 tests
Wet
65.1
2x / 10 tests
Value
57.5
0.38x / 6 tests
Comfort
52.2
0.29x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
70.4
11 tests
Handling
67.6
9 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 12
Publications: 8
Period: 2015 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 13
Avg Rating: 78.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.37
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 12/30 2 metrics
2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2018 235/60 R18 5/10 10 metrics
2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 8/11 0 metrics
New VS 4mm VS 2mm All Season Tyre Performance Tyre Reviews 2017 185/65 R15 4/6 0 metrics
2017 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test Auto Express 2017 205/55 R16 6/10 0 metrics
2017 All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2017 205/55 R16 9/12 11 metrics
2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2017 205/55 R16 9/11 9 metrics
2016 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test Auto Express 2016 225/45 R17 4/6 0 metrics
2016 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 5/10 0 metrics
2016 ACE All Season Tyre Test ACE 2016 205/55 R16 5/10 0 metrics
2016 GF All Season Tyre Test Gute Fahrt 2016 205/55 R16 5/11 0 metrics
2015 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2015 195/65 R 15 5/10 0 metrics
12
Tests
6th
Average
4th
Best
12th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
12th/30
8th/11
Low wear.
Weak in the snow and on wet roads.
High resistance to aquaplaning, well priced.
Higher noise levels, long braking distances on snow and dry roads.
Recommended.

Alternative Tyres

7.9/10
80% 38 reviews
7.1/10
82% 5 reviews
6.8/10
83% 32 reviews
6.4/10
84% 7 reviews
6.3/10
83% 5 reviews
5.7/10
79% 48 reviews
80% 4 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D C 71
14 inch
165/70R14 85 T XL D C 71
175/65R14 86 T XL D C 71
165/70R14 85 T XL D C 71
175/65R14 86 T XL D C 71
185/60R14 82 H D C 71
165/70R14 81 T C C 69
175/65R14 82 T D C 71
185/70R14 88 T C C 71
15 inch
195/65R15 95 T XL D C 71
185/65R15 88 T D C 71
195/55R15 85 H D C 72
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
195/55R15 85 H D C 72
195/65R15 91 H D C 72
195/65R15 95 H XL C C 71
195/65R15 91 V D C 72
195/65R15 95 H XL D C 71
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H D C 72
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 72
205/55R16 91 H D C 72
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 72
205/60R16 92 V C C 72
215/60R16 99 H XL C C 72
205/60R16 92 H B D 67
205/60R16 92 H C B 71
215/60R16 95 V C C 72
17 inch
225/50R17 94 V C C 71
205/50R17 93 V XL C C 72
215/45R17 91 V XL D C 72
235/65R17 108 V XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 V XL C C 72
225/60R17 99 H D C 72
225/45R17 94 V XL D C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
18 inch
225/40R18 92 V XL D C 72
235/60R18 107 V XL C C 72
225/40R18 88 V D C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook Kinergy 4S >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Kinergy 4S

Ask a question
March 25, 2023

Hi, How come this tyre came higher than the Goodyear in the all season test yet the tyre data is lower than the Goodyear? Where does the information come from. Thanks

It was the newer 4S2 version of this tyre in the Tyre Reviews test. The bars at the top are an aggregation of the user review data not the test data.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
Available in 2 tyre sizes - View all.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 13 user reviews

Drivers generally view the Hankook Kinergy 4S as a strong all-season performer, especially in snow and heavy rain, with many praising grip, braking confidence, and overall safety. While several high-scoring reviews highlight wet/snow traction and value, a notable minority report rapid tread wear and some wet/dry grip shortcomings. Overall sentiment skews positive given the higher-weighted strong scores.

Strengths
  • Snow traction
  • Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Overall handling confidence
  • Value for money
  • Braking performance
Areas for Improvement
  • Fast tread wear
  • Wet/dry grip inconsistency for some users
  • Noise

Top 3 Hankook Kinergy 4S Reviews

Given 100% while driving a Renault super 5 (155/70 R13) on track for 10,000 spirited miles
These tyres have so much grip, that the human brain cannot resist such lateral acceleration. And I am not exaggerating.
As you can see in the attached photo, I raced a slalom last week with my Renault Supercinq GTR.

Due to the tremendous acceleration, I was instantly knocked out and I have just woken up again 5 minutes ago.
They even tell me that I didn't finish last in the slalom... I don't know if it's true or not, because I was unconscious.

In every case, here you have the link to my run in the slalom:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaC7sEwJK9Y
Ask a question | Helpful 809
July 15, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Dacia Duster 4x4 (215/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 36,000 spirited miles
Overall I am satisfied about my decision to buy them, but I was disappointed about the fact they wore very fast, faster than expected, after 58 000 km - compared with the Continental stock tires. I had another pairs of tires ALL SEASONS CONTINENTAL ALLSEASONCONTACT (I was happy with them, too). Even now, after 2 years, on dry surface the Hankooks are almost freezing my Duster (1.6, 4 x 4, petrol, 2016) when a person is appearing from nowhere at a pedestrian cross (having 50 km/h). During work time I am driving 200 km / 5 days. On highways wet surfaces I had full control. I drove on mud, too, they kept me going forward. Slowly. but surely. In summer times I am going to mountains roads and hilltops, nothing special, no aggressive off-road, just pebbled, dust and forest roads. On forest and pebbled roads they behaved very well, but there were noisy. I used them in the winter on snow on Transfagarasan from Capra Chalet till Salvamont Arges refuge Cota 2000. I won`t buy them again because they wore (as I mentioned) too fast.
November 4, 2024
Given 20% while driving a Honda (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I recently got a flat so I took my car in to my trusted car maintenance folks and they said they couldn't fix it, or put on two of the four tires because of the tread wear on them. I have a 2021 Honda CR-V and these were the stock tires Honda opted to put on the car. At roughly 24,000 miles I need new tires. This is absurd. Most of the tires this size are rated for a minimum 50K miles and I got less than half. In some places I've seen these tires rated for 70K. Absurd. I've never liked the noise from these tires or the handling but didn't realize until today just how cheap these tires actually are. Never Hankook again and maybe not Honda again if this is the cheap tire they are opting to put on their cars. Additionally, Honda doesn't cover these tires in their warranty, they expect the tire manufacturer to cover them. Guess what, Hankook doesn't provide a mileage minimum on their tires, likely because they know how awful and cheap these tires are as well. HORRIBLE customer experience.
August 15, 2023
Have you driven on the Hankook Kinergy 4S tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Hankook Kinergy 4S? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Hankook Kinergy 4S >

Latest Hankook Kinergy 4S Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Citroën C3 (175/70 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 16,000 average miles
Replaced some old Hankook summer tyres in October 2015 with these Hankook H740 4S tyres as I wanted better wet and snow grip. I was limited for choice due to uncommon tyre size and didn't want directional tyres as I had a full size alloy spare. The 2nd day after fitting I had to travel on the M62 and was caught in a torrential rain storm. Cars if front of me started drifting all ways after hitting a huge area of standing water, so I braced myself, but needn't have worried. These Hankook H740 4S tyres took it all in their stride and the car stayed in a straight line with no effort from me. Handling is great in all conditions. They have now done 16,000 miles and at my last service 2 months ago I was told they would easily last another year at least, based on my requirements, as I always replace tyres when the tread gets below 4mm. I shall replace them with the same ones when required.
January 18, 2019
Given 44% while driving a Volkswagen up! (165/70 R14 Q) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Dangerous in wet breaking. ABS always on, wet seems snow. Bad even in dry roads. Never again
June 23, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 100% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 23,000 average miles
This is an update to my previous review, to report on the snow performance.

Scotland had a wee bit of bad weather at the start of March '18. For reasons I won't get into on here, I was required to drive through the red weather warning on both days, and the subsequent amber warnings of the rest of the week and this gave me a good opportunity to assess performance in snow/slush and ice. The front tyres had around 5mm left in them (having been swapped after doing 18k on the rear), the rears were effectively brand new, maybe a few thousand miles since fitting.

And that performance was exceptional.

Motorways were cleared, but icy in places. They never feit like they were going to let go without warning. They did give enough feedback to allow easing off before anything went pear shaped.

Surface streets were variable quality, with some roads in excess of 12" of snow. Others had slush and others a mix of hard pack and fresh snow. And we charged on through. Even fairly steep hills were dispatched without drama, just an occasional touch of traction control for some of worst parts. These tyres on this car means I'm getting to my destination regardless.

Now, a downside... during the snow, I damaged 2 of them (potholes can still bite when they're hidden). Thankfully, I've managed to source some replacements, they're fitted, and I'm a happy bunny again.
March 17, 2018
Given 81% while driving a Toyota Yaris (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 3,000 easy going miles
Have you ever wondered how the snow plow driver gets to work in the middle of the worst snow. These tyres no 4x4 required.
March 6, 2018
Given 79% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
My car was bought 2nd hand from a well known Scottish car dealer network, and had been fitted with some of their own branded tyres. They lasted less than a week before they were binned.

So, January of 2017 saw a set of Kinergys fitted. And they worked well in the snow, very well. They were also quite impressive in some of the torrential rain we had through the year, and pretty good in the 2 days of sunshine that passes for a Scottish summer.

I drive an estate, and tend to lug a fair amount of kit everywhere, and in an enthusiastic fashion. They've been good in almost all conditions except for some occasional understeer on a rather tight mini roundabout near home. But that's only ever been when the conditions have been greasy. Performance in heavy rain on motorways has been on a par with some of the more expensive rubber I've had fitted to other similar vehicles. But the winter performance has been impressive.

Wear has also been acceptable. Roughly 18000 miles done, the fronts are below 4mm, the rears are still above 6mm. Purely as a precaution, and because of the long term weather reports, the fronts were replaced with more of the same in the last few weeks. And, again, they have proven to be good in the snow and cold temps of the last month. At £50 a corner, they're exceptionally good value, and will be a permanent fixture on this particular vehicle for the foreseeable future.
November 25, 2017
Given 49% while driving a BMW 316 (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 4,500 easy going miles
We used the previous generation of these tyres the H730 and unfortunately these are a great disappointment. My wife and I have both been sliding on greasy roads - in a 90bhp bmw!! - when the previous set didn't do this even when they were nearly done - so far this set has 4500miles. I honestly won't be buying the h740s again back to the h730s if I can get them.
January 19, 2017
Given 76% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
So i replaced Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2's on my EP3 Civic Type R with these. I tried these tyres last year on another car when it snowed and my civic could not get out of the very steep estate and they were phenomenally good in the snow.

These tyres are very good, they do feel like they provide less feedback than the Goodyear Eagles and less lateral grip however they are still very good. I feel that the loss in summer traction/feedback is worth the advantage when its wet/cold/snow handling. They feel surprisingly planted in the wet and are still miles better in all conditions compared to cheap budget summer tyres. The car will not brake traction under hard acceleration which it would do previously on Toyo proxes..

Conclusion: Good compromise for massive winter benefits. No all season will be as good as a dedicated summer performance tyre. Snow handling profoundly strong, going up large steep hills with compacted ice and snow the car did not brake traction once.
August 24, 2016
Given 82% while driving a Daihatsu Trevis (155/65 R14 T) on mostly town for 10,000 easy going miles
I've bought these tyres ti replace stock tyres with a 4season.
Till now, I'm reslly satisfied on dry, wet and also snow!
Let's see during the summer
February 24, 2016
Given 87% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 4 Door (2008) (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
These tyres replaced some nasty Nankang tyres however on my other cars i run Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2.

First impressions have been good, the wet grip is night and day in comparison to cheaper brand tyres, they handled a 70 - 0 emergency stop when a lorry pulled out in the wet very well. the car feels a lot more composed and competent. The real test will be how they cope with snow (if we get any) and how they wear during the summer months. For a everyday car they seem a good all round Tyre with the potential to offer added safety in the winter months at a good price and without the hassle of changing to winter rubber. For sporty and powerful vehicles i believe that the best is still a dedicated winter tyre and summer tyre.
December 17, 2015
Given 86% while driving a Fiat Panda (175/65 R15 H) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Having replace Yokohama W703,W902 and Conti's winter as a primary installation, I've to admit that the latest is the best choice so far, offering better braking distance, low noise and prodigious grip in wet. Can't say much for durability since I've made only 10K. Price was the same with Yokohama's cheaper from Conti's: 240 Euros, in Greece.
December 16, 2015