Menu

Continental ExtremeContact DWS

The Continental ExtremeContact DWS is a High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
89%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
80%
Wear
84%
Comfort
90%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
90%
9 Reviews
86% Average
174,058 miles driven
Continental ExtremeContact DWS

Continental ExtremeContact DWS

All Season Premium
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 9
Avg Rating: 86.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 3.48
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Continental ExtremeContact DWS

Alternative Tyres

7.9/10
80% 38 reviews
7.4/10
78% 13 reviews
7.1/10
82% 5 reviews
6.8/10
83% 32 reviews
6.4/10
84% 7 reviews
6.3/10
83% 5 reviews
5.7/10
79% 48 reviews
80% 4 reviews

Questions and Answers for the Continental ExtremeContact DWS

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Continental ExtremeContact DWS. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Continental ExtremeContact DWS Reviews

Given 91% while driving a BMW 340 m sport (255/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 58 spirited miles
After having Michelin’s on my car and switching to Continental Extreme Contact’s I couldn’t be more pleased. They hold the road in dry and wet weather and are much better in the snow than the Michelin’s. I’m buying another set now for my BMW 335i xdrive msport.
Ask a question | Helpful 858
May 29, 2021
Given 86% while driving a Mercedes Benz w211 e500 (245/50 R17) on mostly town for 30,000 easy going miles
On a Mercedes EClass e500, these tyres are amazing. Have already done 50,000kms and I reckon less than 50% wear. OEM Spec is 245/45, but the extra 5% fills the guards better and gives a far more compliant and smooth ride. No rubbing on guards or anything.
I might be the only person in the world who fitted this size to an eclass, but very very happy, a quiet sure footed ride.
January 12, 2017
Given 94% while driving a Mazda MX5 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 60,000 average miles
Last review from Seattle by me on these. Buying next set of same tire.
September 5, 2013
Have you driven on the Continental ExtremeContact DWS tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Continental ExtremeContact DWS? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Continental ExtremeContact DWS >

Latest Continental ExtremeContact DWS Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Mazda MX5 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 40,000 average miles
40,000 miles on the DWS in/around Seattle USA and I am still impressed with the performance of these tires. I posted 2 prior reviews for them. I would buy these again simply because they do so many things right in all conditions except snow in which case I park the Miata anyways (we get maybe 2 weeks of snowy roads a year here). Maybe that's why I am enjoying them as much as when I first got them. As they wear they become better on pavement. I'll post another review in a year or before if anything changes! Safe Driving All!
September 14, 2012
Given 91% while driving a Mazda mx 5 (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
So I am the fellow from Seattle who wrote the review on these from Sept. 2010 below. Having put 30,000 miles on them I thought it was worth re-posting an update. All in all I have to say that some 14 months later I am still very satisfied with the Conti ExtremeContact DWS. I made it through a rainy and unseasonably snowy & cold 2010/2011 with no issues, mishaps or surprises. On the snowiest days I didn't drive my MX-5 simply due to this car has no ground clearance. I did however drive it on lightly snowy roads and they beat my expectations. In the rain, they are wonderful. We are back in our rainy season and they still perform very well. I still view these as one of the best tire purchasing decisions I have made. I'll be curious to see how they perform over the next year since in the US at least a tread warranty is not offered (or wasn't when I bought them) which may mean their longevity is an unknown. For road trips and comfort, operate them at exactly the recommended inflation values for your vehicle. I tried overinflating them by ~3-5 psi which did improve cornering/sidewall firmness but also made the ride harsher.
November 18, 2011
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 70% while driving a Toyota Matrix (Corolla wagon) FWD (205/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 9,000 spirited miles
I drive hard: used to rally, some autocross also. Due to my location, I always buy all-season tyres -- though I still expect HIGH performance. In the past I've had Bridgestone RE960AS and Michelin Pilot Sport A/S. The DWS surpasses ALL tyres I've owned: greatest grip in dry, wet, and snow (especially wet and snow). HOWEVER, I initially disliked them for the FEELING when driving them at (and slightly beyond) the limit -- the sidewalls are VERY soft, which makes for a nice ride, and probably accounts for the grip in wet and snow, but eliminates anything resembling turn-in or precise handling. After greatly increasing pressures front and rear, they are now acceptable to me, but only just. Although they are spectacular tyres due to their incredibly high grip levels -- especially considering they're all-seasons -- I won't likely buy them again (though perhaps for my wife's car) since I miss the precise feeling of a true performance tyre.
October 21, 2010
Given 80% while driving a Mazda MX5 (205/45 R17 R) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
I replaced a set of Federal Super Steel 505 tires that came on the used 06 Mazda MX-5 I purchased in March. Read the reviews posted elsewhere on this site. I concur. They are abysmal. I live in the Seattle, WA area and due to lots of rain I elected to purchase the Conti DSW's. Great improvement in all conditions except dry cornering.I finally feel safe again.Its Sept and the rain has started. So far, so good. Great on corners and absolutely no hydroplaning.
September 16, 2010