Menu
Vredestein Quatrac 5 View Gallery (1)
145-275/45-80 R13-20 166 sizes 2014 Winter rated

Vredestein Quatrac 5

The Vredestein Quatrac 5 is a High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
79%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
82%
Wear
82%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
78%
Snow Grip
77%
Ice Grip
70%
38 Reviews
80% Average
496,242 miles driven
21 Tests (avg: 6th)
Vredestein Quatrac 5

Vredestein Quatrac 5

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
8.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
86.1
1.38x / 12 tests
Value
72.6
0.42x / 13 tests
Dry
69.9
1.5x / 14 tests
Wet
68.1
1.93x / 19 tests
Comfort
65.2
0.32x / 6 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
77.8
20 tests
Braking
73.6
20 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 21
Publications: 10
Period: 2015 - 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 38
Avg Rating: 79.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.55
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2019 235/55 R19 1/9 10 metrics
2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test Auto Navigator 2019 205/55 R16 14/18 5 metrics
2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 7/12 12 metrics
2018 27 All Season Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 6/27 0 metrics
2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2018 225/45 R16 5/9 10 metrics
7 of the best all season tyres Tyre Reviews 2018 205/55 R16 4/10 0 metrics
2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 7/11 0 metrics
New VS 4mm VS 2mm All Season Tyre Performance Tyre Reviews 2017 185/65 R15 5/6 0 metrics
2017 All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2017 205/55 R16 8/12 11 metrics
2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2017 205/55 R16 6/11 9 metrics
2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 4/10 7 metrics
2016 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test Auto Express 2016 225/45 R17 5/6 0 metrics
2016 AMS SUV All Season Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2016 215/60 R17 4/4 0 metrics
2016 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 7/10 0 metrics
2016 ADAC All Season Tyre Test ADAC 2016 205/55 R16 2/7 0 metrics
2016 ACE All Season Tyre Test ACE 2016 205/55 R16 8/10 0 metrics
2016 GF All Season Tyre Test Gute Fahrt 2016 205/55 R16 10/11 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2015 215/65 R16 1/6 0 metrics
2015 AZ All Season Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2015 185/65 R15 5/8 0 metrics
2015 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test Auto Bild 2015 195/65 R 15 4/10 0 metrics
2015 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test Auto Express 2015 205/55 R16 3/6 0 metrics
21
Tests
6th
Average
1st
Best
14th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
14th/18
An excellent all season tyre with great performance in all weather conditions. Good balance and precise steering, short wet and snow braking, well priced.
None mentioned.
4th/10

Alternative Tyres

7.6/10
78% 13 reviews
7.1/10
82% 5 reviews
6.7/10
83% 32 reviews
6.4/10
84% 7 reviews
6.3/10
83% 5 reviews
5.6/10
79% 48 reviews
80% 4 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80 R 13 79 T D C 69
14 inch
185/60 R 14 82 H D C 69
185/60 R 14 82 T D C 69
185/60 R 14 82 H D C 69
185/60 R 14 82 T D C 69
175/65 R 14 82 T D C 69
175/65 R 14 82 T D C 69
165/70 R 14 81 T D C 69
165/70 R 14 81 T D C 69
185/70 R 14 88 T D C 69
185/70 R 14 88 T D C 69
15 inch
195/55 R 15 85 H C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 H C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 69
195/55 R 15 85 H C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 H C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 T C C 69
195/65 R 15 95 T XL C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 V C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 T C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 T C C 69
195/65 R 15 95 T XL C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 V C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 T C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 V C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 V C C 69
16 inch
205/55 R 16 91 H C C 69
205/55 R 16 91 V C C 69
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C C 69
205/55 R 16 91 H C C 69
205/55 R 16 91 V C C 69
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C C 69
215/60 R 16 99 H XL C C 71
205/55 R 16 94 V XL C C 69
215/60 R 16 99 H XL C C 71
205/55 R 16 94 V XL C C 69
205/60 R 16 96 V XL C C 69
205/60 R 16 96 V XL C C 69
215/70 R 16 100 H C C 71
215/70 R 16 100 H C C 71
17 inch
215/45 R 17 91 Y XL C C 71
215/45 R 17 91 Y XL C C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Vredestein Quatrac 5 >>

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Quatrac 5

Ask a question
April 7, 2016

Thx for the reply! Very helpfull, always difficult how to interpret data. I'll have a look at the Nokian. I'm from The Netherlands, so no heavy snow conditions or lots off ice. And while I do understand that an all season tire is a compromis, I think its the best way to go. Any thought on that? Thx again!

Here in the UK climate we feel the CrossClimate is the best compromise as we see very little snow. The CrossClimate is the only all season tyre we've tested which doesn't have a braking disadvantage over summer tyres in the dry. See our <a href="http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/Is-there-a-true-all-season-tyre-We-find-out.htm">All Season Tyre Test</a> for further information.
April 7, 2016

I see in different test these tires preform bad with aquaplanning? How good or bad are they in the wet? (Looking for an all season tie in size 195/60 R16, not a lot to chose from) Thx!

While we've no direct experience with the Quatrac 5, they wouldn't be a test winner if they were bad in the wet. Aquaplaning is one of those tests we feel perhaps the magazines put too much weight on, as while aquaplaning can be serious, less than 1% of all accidents across Europe are caused by standing water. The Nokian WeatherProof is also available in <a href="http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Search/Size/195-60-16/Season/All-Season">your size</a>, which is certainly worth considering.
September 16, 2017

i've got a ix35 4x4 and I want to fit all season tyres, can you recommend any (225 55 18)

Of the tyres we currently list in those sizes, the Quatrac 5 is probably the best available.
April 14, 2018

I have a 2011 VW Tiguan with 235/55r17 tyres, live in Aberdeenshire and been looking at all pro and con comments relating to all season tyres and cannot really make my mind up. I have narrowed it down to 5 but I am also interested in treadwear life. Would you recommend either the Cross Climate +, Goodyear 4Seasons Gen-2, Vredestein Quatrac 5 or I have been told that the Pirelli Verde All Seasons have a longer life. I know its a long list but with averaging 10-12k mileage a year the tyres previously purchased haven't lasted more than 2yrs

Have a look at <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU4O3ulin80">this video</a>, it should answer most of your questions. The Michelin will also offer the best longevity.
December 1, 2018

Just bought these for the Kuga, 235/45 R19 big tyres and not the cheapest. I notice that there is an inner on these tyres and the patterns run in different directions on the same axle? Is this right?

That is correct, the Quatrac 5 should be fitted noting the inside and outside marks on the tyre sidewall which will give you slightly different patterns across the axle.
June 8, 2019

How many miles can I expect to get from these tires 235/60R18

Tyre wear can have a huge number of factors such as vehicle weight, driving style and surfaces driven on. I'd recommend looking through the wear ratings on the website to find an average for your own personal setup.
December 12, 2019

I have a Skoda Kodiaq 4x4 with the 190bhp Diesel engine. This was fitted with Conti SportContact 5s which have been great but now the front 2 need replacing at 17500 miles. I’ve been considering fitting all seasons but it’s only the fronts that need replacing. Having recently watched your video highlighting the dangers of summer and winter tyres on opposite axles , is the same likely to apply with new all season (front) and part worn Conti ContactSport 5s with 4nm (rear) ? If so then I see that the Goodyear F1 asymmetric 3s and 5s get great ratings/reviews would you recommend these on a big SUV it would you recommended something different?

In snow and ice, yes you will have a similar balance problem between summer and all season tyres. In normal running the difference will be less pronounced, but still not ideal. The Asymmetric 5 would be great on a big SUV as long as you match the load rating specified by Skoda.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 33 user reviews

Drivers generally rate the Vredestein Quatrac 5 highly as a quiet, comfortable, and well-balanced all-season tyre with strong wet performance for most users, solid dry grip, and very good snow ability for an all-season. Many report excellent tread life and fuel economy. A minority cite wet braking/aquaplaning issues as the tyres wear or under heavy use, plus occasional noise or edge wear. Overall sentiment is positive with most saying they would buy the Quatrac 5 again.

Strengths
  • Low noise/comfort
  • Wet grip for most users
  • Good snow performance for all-season
  • Dry grip/handling
  • Long tread life/wear
  • Good fuel economy/low rolling resistance
  • Value for money
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet braking/aquaplaning for some users
  • Edge wear/uneven wear
  • Noise for some users

Top 3 Vredestein Quatrac 5 Reviews

Given 60% while driving a Volkswagen Caddy (195/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
This is my second review of these tyres as I ended up using my van for work over the past winter so clocked about another 15000 miles. I swapped the rears with the fronts and the edges of the fronts were fairly worn and I was suffering with a lot of wheelspin and dangerous braking. The swap improved the braking to the point of not dangerous over winter but it was still below average, handling also improved but on the cold roads I was still getting a lot of wheelspin. One particularly bad trip up north on a motorway run I was suffering extremely badly with aquaplaning even with around 6mm of tread left on them. I swapped them out after with a pair of Michelin cross climates which pretty much solved all my handling, grip, aquaplaning and braking issues. I kept the worn ones on the back and they were fine for the rest of the winter with no problems at all there. Now it's summer I've switched those back to the front and inflated to 45psi cold to get the last use out of them before replacing with the less worn ones. The increased pressure seems to have improved the grip, braking and handling from what it was before. In the warm and dry they are better handling than the cross climates although still not as good in the wet or on the brakes but do seem better than before. I also had some snow driving with the less worn pair on the front before swapping to the Michelins and although they are not as good as those in the cold, wet and ice they actually worked better in snow for me. The Michelins look at least half worn after just 6000 miles on the front so considering the cost difference I'd say the Vredestines are a better tyre unless you are doing a lot of driving in bad conditions. In which case I'd probably try the Goodyear Vector 4's which will be going on my Golf diesel this winter. As I said in the last review the Quadrac 5's were pretty good all round for the first 12,000 miles, I don't think the Cross climates would even last any longer than 12,000 miles so the Vredestines win by default. The aquaplaning on the front with the hardly worn tyres is my biggest issue and the reason I won't buy these again. The newer version is supposed to be 10% better for that but that's not good enough. Make it 25% and I'd be interested. The Michelins have not aquaplaned once and they are down to about 4mm. The worn pair still on the van is down to about 3mm tread after approximately 20,000 miles on the front and 10,000 on the rear. They are bald on the outside edges but still legal as you only need 1.6mm on 75% of the centre tread in the UK.
May 16, 2021
Given 81% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (215/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 18,600 average miles
I drive the Quatrac 5 now for two years and 30.000 kilometers (18600 miles), they're decent all season tyres. Back tyres are down to 6,2mm on the front tyres are down to 5mm. One more important thing, the Quatrac 5 are extremely quiet, someone in the previous comments said these tyres are noisy, I assume his tyres were faulty or his car broken. The fuel economy is amazing. The stopping distance in the wet and on hot summer days isn't the very best, but it's exactly what I expected from a all season tyre, so everything is fine. Would I buy them again? Of course I would, they're great.
August 30, 2021
Given 56% while driving a Ford Mondeo estate (215/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 8,000 average miles
Generally happy with tyre performance other than durability. 2have developed bulges in the sidewalls with no known impact within a year/8000 miles, doesn't look like vredestein is going to be interested in the UK (they offer warranties in other countries). Unless resolved these will be the last I buy
June 27, 2020

How would you rate the Vredestein Quatrac 5?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Vredestein Quatrac 5 Reviews

Given 85% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (225/65 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
Very impressive all around performing tire.
February 18, 2021
Given 94% while driving a Skoda (235/40 R19 W) on mostly motorways for 32,000 spirited miles
These have been the best tyres I've had and are easily comparable to the set of cross climates I've previously had on my old car. I bought these when I finally ran the tread down in the initial bridgestone set which came with my car which I felt did well to get to 28k miles (they were OEM models though so I'd be surprised if off the shelf ones lasted that long). These however are on 32k miles and now they're about done so I've definitely had my use out of them. Many garages tried to put me off these tyres, likely because they didn't get a good deal on the price, so I ended up buying them online for around 75% of the prices I was quoted elsewhere. I've also has a lot of people turn their nose up thinking it's some cheap brand but I have to explain that actually they're just not that well known over here. They were superb in the wet and despite having a lower wet grip rating the the Bridgestone's which the car came on these for outgripped those tyres by far in the wet. You could feel the car scrambling to get away from the lights or junction in the wet with the Bridgestone's and up until the tread has significantly worn down I've never had that. The road noise definitely isn't the quietest I've had (hence the slightly lower rating on that category) but they are large tyres so they're never going to be the best with that anyway and it's not something I can say ever bothered me. They are quite low profile too so they are less forgiving in a car with a sportier suspension in terms of ride quality but in terms of being able to feel the road underneath they did just fine with that.
October 21, 2020
Given 80% while driving a Renault Renault Megane III Estate 1.5dci (205/50 R17 W) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
I drove about 10,000 miles on these tires and in general I can say that the tires are worthy for those who do not want to bother with changing tires or wheels during the winter period. If the winter is not harsh, you can definitely buy it, but preferably not a low profile because it will be harsh) Otherwise, the tires is not noisy, works well on a dry surface, but it is difficult works on ice or snow, but on snow not as critical as on ice. The conclusion is very simple, use this tire only in a mild winter.
October 10, 2020
Given 66% while driving a Volkswagen Caddy (195/50 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
I have these tyres on a MK2 VW Caddy SDi 1.9 diesel with not much over 60bhp. They have now covered around 12,000 to 15,000 miles, fronts are down to 5mm with heavy wear on the edges and the rears are down to 7mm. Most of my driving has been on road trips through Europe in summer in very hot temperatures with a fairly heavy load, I mainly use a car for day to day driving. In the dry these tyres perform as well as all but the best summer tyres although they are starting to drop off with regular wheelspin occurring even in the dry in recent times. The van will understeer a bit at the limit but it is to be expected on a front drive which combined with the coilovers handles nearly as well as my BMW 1 series. In the wet handling is also good on corners but wheelspin is now nearly as bad as any tyres I've experienced when launching or accelerating hard. For the first 10 to 12 thousand miles wheelspin wasn't a problem in the wet. Braking wise in the wet even when the tyres were new they were only average, now they are close to being dangerous with planning needed in bad conditions, in an emergency situation you are going to crash. I believe the performance drop off may be due to the excessively hot conditions the tyres have been mainly used in as heat cycles will harden rubber, the fact that the fronts have barely worn down much more than the rears show that they may have been overheated when barreling down the alps and doing a couple of laps of the Nurbirgring. When I happened to be using the van after not driving it much for a while it rained and I had no chance of stopping from a not fast speed for a junction, luckily I timed the traffic while I was locking and unlocking the wheels so as not to crash as I pulled straight out in front of someone. Now I am very steady whenever the rain starts to fall or I make sure to drive something else and will swap the tyres around as soon as the summer starts to end. If performance is still unsafe when braking in the wet I will purchase a pair of Michelin Cross Climates for the front as according to the tests they maintain performance until they are on the legal limit. I can't stick with dangerous tyres no matter how much tread they have left, they are great still in dry conditions and would recommend them if you can get them for a good enough price. I've also got Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons on my 1 series, the Michelins were too expensive for those wheels, so far the Goodyears have impressed although they don't seem quite as good as these Vredestines were when new in the dry. I haven't had the pleasure of snow and ice driving with the Vredestines but on cold tarmac in the winter they out grip most summer tyres in corners but are a bit weak when braking again. For the record the van has had new brake pads, discs, fluid and I've cleaned all the dust out of the drums, plus the shoes are within the service limit. All done since I've had these tyres, plus it has gone through 2 MOT's. Most of my driving has been easy going except on occasion, rolling resistance is very good, on long motorway runs at 50mph I was averaging close to 70mpg. Normal UK driving gets me mid 50's to the gallon. Overall the Quadrac 5 are good but if you are keeping the vehicle allow them to need replacement within 15,000 miles unless you are happy with sub par / dangerous wet weather performance. You can buy better tyres but if the price is right still worth a look.
August 9, 2020
Given 82% while driving a Peugeot 205 (155/55 R13 T) on track for 20,000 spirited miles
Excellent especially in the dry and for an all-season tyre, and with a very progressive handling. I cannot over-exaggerate how can a human-invented substance have so much grip. Mankind has never seen something like this, and probably will never again. Even at the racetrack, these tyres are unbelievable. As an example, you can check my lap at the Nordschleife on Youtube, under the title: "Peugeot 205 1.1i (60 HP) - Nürburgring Nordschleife BTG lap in 10'19" on all-season tyres".
May 18, 2020
Given 72% while driving a Ford Focus 2002 Hatchback (195/60 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 28,500 spirited miles
My experience with these tyres: -very good as summer tyres, with high levels of grip in the dry -decent as winter tyres -they retain the same characteristics in any outside temperature Some things to point out: -they have been quite noisy throughout their life -the sidewall is taller compared to other same size tyres (dispite this, the handling is very good) -although the tyre pressures were always correct and regularly checked, the edges did wear faster than the inside of the tyres. Higher tyre pressures seemed to solve this problem slightly
May 2, 2020
Given 92% while driving a Ford Mondeo mk3 2.0 petrol (205/55 R16 V) on mostly country roads for 500 average miles
Many years ago whilst living in Scotland I used to use Vredestein tyres sold by the local garage. .Don't knoiw why I got out of the habit. Now living in Derbyshire, most of my driving is on muddy local lanes and roads with a few ventures onto motorways.
As my old Mondeo passed yet another MOT I had to buy tyres for it. I'm not a tyre geek, but prefer a quiet tyre. After a bit of research and reading the reviews here I decided on an all season tyre and rekindled my enthusiasm for Vredestein.
From the second I drove away from the garage I knew I'd made the correct choice. The Quatrac 5 is quiet. It isn't soggy, pretty firm, gives lovely feedback and is great on the local muddy lanes. The day after fitting they got a blast down the motorway going south - a really comfortable and secure experience in cold heavy rain and flooded roads.
We've only driven about 500 miles, deliberately enacted a few emergency stops and slews in the wet and dry. No spin when accelerating. So far they're knocking spots of the Toyos, Michelins, Goodyears we've used in past times.
Can't speak for longevity as it's early days and awaiting some snow and ice.
How can one get so enthusiastic about four bits of rubber?
January 3, 2020
Given 85% while driving a Ford Bmax (195/65 R16) on mostly motorways for 50,000 average miles
Living in the Netherlands, grip in wet conditions is more important than in snow. I drove 80.000 km with one set and still have 3.5 mm left. Grip in the wet is great compared to my previous tyres (factory fit on a Ford Fiesta, don't know which ones). When going to Germany in winter, grip in snow turned out to be bad. a slight incline was too much on compacted snow. To me, this doesn't matter because that's 0,5 of the 80.000 km I drove with those tires. The grip in the wet, wear and comfort make them a 'buy again'! 3 mm is fine for next summer if they'll last that long, 1,6 mm is required in the Netherlands. So this is past 'mid life' but will take some time before replacement.
December 7, 2019
Given 93% while driving a Audi 1.8T Quattro (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 30,000 easy going miles
Had these on my Audi A5 Quattro for 2 years and 30,000 miles. Just had the MOT and all 4 still have 6mm of tread on them.
They are really quiet and smooth and have excellent grip in snow, wet and dry conditions. Will definitely buy them again.
May 30, 2019
Given 92% while driving a Skoda Octavia (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 30,000 easy going miles
When on wet surfaces, I couldn't tell much difference compared to the dry ones! A bit understeering when pushed to the limit on dry tarmac, but until right before the limit it's as good as a premium summer tyre. Really comfortable on bumpy - uneven surfaces.

It surely prevents you from using chains when dealing with snow and ice. I'd definitely buy them again.
May 18, 2019
Given 88% while driving a Subaru Legacy 3.0R Spec B (215/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Having had our first significant snowfall of the year, a solid 10cm on the side roads, these tyres have performed exceptionally. They provide ample grip on even significant snow covered inclines, granted with the assistance of the AWD system in my legacy, but its is the lateral grip while cornering and stopping power that really stands out.
Even in lower temperatures - sub 5/6 degrees C- they remain noticeably more flexible, retaining the same grip available at higher temperatures.
Wear is too early to comment other than there are no real signs after 1000 miles on a fairly potent legacy spec b.
100% recommend to anyone looking for a winter/ all season.
January 30, 2019
Given 80% while driving a Hyundai Getz (185/60 R14 T) on mostly country roads for 32,500 average miles
Tyres are fitted in March 2016. Till now 32500miles are done. No problems in summers and winters until this year. Thread depth is 4mm now and my car slides on snow sometimes. Put winter tyres in January and no slide anymore. Think that they will serve as a summer tyre for one season and that's all.
January 29, 2019
Rate the Vredestein Quatrac 5