Menu

A newer edition of this test is out: 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test

Test source Auto Bild Allrad

2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test

Overall test winnerVredestein Quatrac 5

Earlier this year Auto Bild published their 2019 SUV all season tyre test, using an Audi Q3 wearing the popular 235/55 R19 all season tyre size.

Tyres tested
7
Tested size
235/55 R19
Disciplines
9

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

7 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Vredestein Quatrac 5

+An excellent all season tyre with great performance in all weather conditions. Good balance and precise steering, short wet and snow braking, well priced.

−None mentioned.

Read full verdict
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate SUV

+A strong allrounder with sport dynamic handling in the dry, and good in the snow and wet. Low rolling resistance.

−Expensive.

Read full verdict
3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact

+Excellent in the snow, dynamic wet handling, good comfort levels, low noise, best rolling resistance on test.

−Understeer in the dry.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV

+Short snow and wet braking distances, low noise, low rolling resistance.

−Average snow cornering, understeer in the dry.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Nokian WeatherProof SUV

+Strong winter abilities, good aquaplaning result, low noise.

−Extended wet and dry braking, understeer in the dry.

Read full verdict
6th

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

+Good aquaplaning result.

−Slow steering, understeer and long braking distances in the wet, average comfort.

Read full verdict
7th

Gripmax Status AllClimate

+Low rolling resistance, low price.

−Very poor grip in the wet and snow, very long wet braking distances, poor dry handling.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19

TyreVredestein Quatrac 5Michelin CrossClimate SUVContinental AllSeasonContactGoodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUVNokian WeatherProof SUVFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Gripmax Status AllClimate
Position1st2nd3rdJoint 4thJoint 4th6th7th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry97.9%100%97.8%95.7%93%97.4%94.5%
Wet99.4%96.7%97.5%99.1%94.6%93.8%74.9%
Snow95.3%91.7%97.6%93.2%99.8%91.1%86.7%
Comfort98.6%99%99.9%100%99.6%98.8%97.7%
Rolling Resistance81.4%91.3%100%89.6%78.7%84.3%87.5%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Earlier this year Auto Bild published their 2019 SUV all season tyre test, using an Audi Q3 wearing the popular 235/55 R19 all season tyre size.

As usual, all seven tyre patterns were tested in the dry, wet and snow, and as a reference Auto Bild included a premium summer and winter tyre.

All Season vs Summer vs Winter

As we've seen before, the balance of all season vs summer tyres follows a general trend. Summer tyres do the best in the wet and dry, but cannot perform in snowy conditions. 

When it comes to comparing all season tyres against winter tyres, things get a little more muddled. In this test the unnamed premium winter tyre only won the aquaplaning test. It was strong in the snow, but not the strongest on test, and while it was weaker in the dry and wet than most of the all season tyres, it wasn't the worst. It just goes to show, the range of all season tyres abilities can span from dry optimised, like the Michelin Crossclimate to a winter tyre beating all season tyre, like the Nokian Weatherproof.

Dry

The dry braking results yielded no big surprises, with the summer tyre and Michelin CrossClimate leading the pack. The Continental was the best of the rest, with the winter bias Nokian Weatherproof struggling to stop the SUV in dry conditions.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
36.9 m -2.00 m
38.9 m Best
40.1 m +1.20 m
40.5 m +1.60 m
40.6 m +1.70 m
42 m +3.10 m
42.1 m +3.20 m
RefReference Winter
42.8 m +3.90 m
43.6 m +4.70 m

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (6.7 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths).

The dry handling results were similar to the dry braking, with the summer and Michelin leading the pack.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
96 km/h +0.80 km/h
95.2 km/h Best
95 km/h -0.20 km/h
94.3 km/h -0.90 km/h
94.1 km/h -1.10 km/h
93.9 km/h -1.30 km/h
RefReference Winter
93.4 km/h -1.80 km/h
92.2 km/h -3.00 km/h
92 km/h -3.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (4 Km/H).

Wet

During wet braking, the Vredestein and Continental were closest to the summer tyres distances, just 0.1 meters off. The Nokian, Falken struggled compared to the best on test, and the budget GripMax was shockingly bad.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
55.5 m -0.10 m
55.6 m Best
55.6 m Best
58.5 m +2.90 m
58.6 m +3.00 m
RefReference Winter
59 m +3.40 m
61.4 m +5.80 m
62 m +6.40 m
88.5 m +32.90 m

The difference between best and worst was 59.5% (33 m ≈ 7.3 Car Lengths).

As with the dry handling results, the wet handling results showed a similar order to wet braking.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
82.5 km/h +2.50 km/h
80 km/h Best
80 km/h Best
78.8 km/h -1.20 km/h
78.6 km/h -1.40 km/h
78.5 km/h -1.50 km/h
RefReference Winter
78.2 km/h -1.80 km/h
77.2 km/h -2.80 km/h
66.8 km/h -13.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 19% (15.7 Km/H).

The straight aquaplaning results had the reference winter tyre winning the test, with the summer in the middle of the all season tyres.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
76.5 km/h +0.10 km/h
76.4 km/h Best
75.1 km/h -1.30 km/h
RefReference Summer
74.7 km/h -1.70 km/h
74.5 km/h -1.90 km/h
74 km/h -2.40 km/h
74 km/h -2.40 km/h
72.2 km/h -4.20 km/h
68.5 km/h -7.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (8 Km/H).

Snow

The winter bias Nokian all season tyre won snow braking, stopping in a shorter distance than even the full winter tyre! Continental Did a great job of mixing dry, wet and snow results by finishing second.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
23.5 m Best
RefReference Winter
24.1 m +0.60 m
24.7 m +1.20 m
25 m +1.50 m
25.5 m +2.00 m
27.1 m +3.60 m
27.2 m +3.70 m
28.5 m +5.00 m
RefReference Summer
62.5 m +39.00 m

The difference between best and worst was 166% (39 m ≈ 8.7 Car Lengths).

The Continental and Nokian were again the strongest tyres during snow handling, besting the full winter tyre. The summer tyre could not complete a lap of snow handling, so didn't set a time.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
47.3 km/h Best
47.1 km/h -0.20 km/h
RefReference Winter
46.2 km/h -1.10 km/h
45.9 km/h -1.40 km/h
45.7 km/h -1.60 km/h
45.2 km/h -2.10 km/h
44.6 km/h -2.70 km/h
43 km/h -4.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (4.3 Km/H).

Environment

The Goodyear was the only tyre to match the low noise of the summer tyre.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.1 dB Best
RefReference Summer
72.1 dB 0.00 dB
72.2 dB +0.10 dB
72.4 dB +0.30 dB
RefReference Winter
72.5 dB +0.40 dB
72.8 dB +0.70 dB
73 dB +0.90 dB
73.1 dB +1.00 dB
73.8 dB +1.70 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

The Continental and Michelin had the lowest rolling resistance on test, but were some of the most expensive tyres to purchase at the time of test.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.73 kg/t Best £0
7.37 kg/t +0.64 kg/t £42
RefReference Summer
7.37 kg/t +0.64 kg/t £42
7.51 kg/t +0.78 kg/t £51
RefReference Winter
7.52 kg/t +0.79 kg/t £52
7.69 kg/t +0.96 kg/t £63
7.98 kg/t +1.25 kg/t £82
8.27 kg/t +1.54 kg/t £101
8.55 kg/t +1.82 kg/t £119

The difference between best and worst was 27% (1.82 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nokian WeatherProof SUV uses about 82 L (£119) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Vredestein Quatrac 5

235/55 R19
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Dry97.9%
Wet99.4%
Snow95.3%
Comfort98.6%
Rolling Resistance81.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 740.5 m+1.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 795 km/h-0.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 755.6 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 780 km/hBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 772.2 km/h-4.20 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 725 m+1.50 m
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 745.7 km/h-1.60 km/h
NoiseLower is better6th / 773.1 dB+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 78.27 kg/t+1.54 kg/t
Price
650.00
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate SUV

235/55 R19
Michelin CrossClimate SUV
Dry100%
Wet96.7%
Snow91.7%
Comfort99%
Rolling Resistance91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 738.9 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 795.2 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 758.5 m+2.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 778.6 km/h-1.40 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 774 km/h-2.40 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 727.2 m+3.70 m
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 745.9 km/h-1.40 km/h
NoiseLower is better4th / 772.8 dB+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 77.37 kg/t+0.64 kg/t
Price
830.00
3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact

235/55 R19
Continental AllSeasonContact
Dry97.8%
Wet97.5%
Snow97.6%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 740.1 m+1.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 793.9 km/h-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 758.6 m+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 780 km/hBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 775.1 km/h-1.30 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 724.7 m+1.20 m
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 747.3 km/hBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better2nd / 772.2 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 76.73 kg/tBest in this discipline
Price
770.00
Joint 4th

Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV

235/55 R19
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV
Dry95.7%
Wet99.1%
Snow93.2%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance89.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 742 m+3.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 794.1 km/h-1.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 755.6 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 778.8 km/h-1.20 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 774.5 km/h-1.90 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 725.5 m+2.00 m
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 744.6 km/h-2.70 km/h
NoiseLower is better1st / 772.1 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 77.51 kg/t+0.78 kg/t
Price
810.00
Joint 4th

Nokian WeatherProof SUV

235/55 R19
Nokian WeatherProof SUV
Dry93%
Wet94.6%
Snow99.8%
Comfort99.6%
Rolling Resistance78.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 743.6 m+4.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 792.2 km/h-3.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 761.4 m+5.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 778.5 km/h-1.50 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 774 km/h-2.40 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 723.5 mBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 747.1 km/h-0.20 km/h
NoiseLower is better3rd / 772.4 dB+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 78.55 kg/t+1.82 kg/t
Price
710.00
6th

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

235/55 R19
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Dry97.4%
Wet93.8%
Snow91.1%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance84.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 740.6 m+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 794.3 km/h-0.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 762 m+6.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 777.2 km/h-2.80 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 776.4 km/hBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 727.1 m+3.60 m
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 745.2 km/h-2.10 km/h
NoiseLower is better5th / 773 dB+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 77.98 kg/t+1.25 kg/t
Price
650.00
7th

Gripmax Status AllClimate

235/55 R19
Gripmax Status AllClimate
Dry94.5%
Wet74.9%
Snow86.7%
Comfort97.7%
Rolling Resistance87.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 742.1 m+3.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 792 km/h-3.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 788.5 m+32.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 766.8 km/h-13.20 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 768.5 km/h-7.90 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 728.5 m+5.00 m
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 743 km/h-4.30 km/h
NoiseLower is better7th / 773.8 dB+1.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 77.69 kg/t+0.96 kg/t
Price
480.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

8 comments
  1. naxop archived

    Hi! I have a CX5 2.0 petrol (165 bhp) only front drive.

    We live in a hot and near the sea area, but we have to do like 250 km a day into a cold area, with snow sometimes and frequent ice presence on winding roads. We wear currently Toyo Proxes R46 (225/55 R19). Bad wet handling and decent on dry.

    We are thinking of mounting all season. 225/55 r19 is not very common size and the preferred option (Michelin Crossclimate SUV) is very expensive, so we are thinking of changing to equivalent 235/50 R19.

    As we do a lot of kms, with hot surfaces, frequent ice and event snow, and mixed highway and secundary roads, which model would yoy recommend me? We value wear (as we do lot of kms), and dey/wet/snow/ice balance.

    Thanks.

    #5543
  2. MausyMaus archived

    Nice Test John!

    Just ordered the Vredestein Quatrac 5 in 245/45/20 for our Discovery Sport.
    They gonna replace the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Allseason (who have only M+S) and are done.

    Ps. We live in the Grindelwald Region in Switzerland, can’t wait to test these in this size.
    We had these Quatrac 5 on our Smart fortwo and they did amazingly well here.

    Thank you Vredestein!!

    #5415
    1. TyreReviews MausyMaus archived

      I just came back from Grindelwald! BEautiful place, video up in a few weeks and there's stuff on instagram. Let me know how you get on with the Vreds :)

      #5418
  3. David CGlez archived

    I´m using the Continental AllSeasonsContact in Luxembourg where 3PMFS is mandatory and they are performing much better than my previous winter tyres (MS77) - at least in wet & dry, not tested yet on snow- Really good option.

    #5174
  4. Paolo Cavarzere archived

    Looking at the last tests (not only this one), it seems that all seasons tires have similar (sometime better) snow performances than pure winter tires but with significant better performances on the dry and wet.
    I'm starting to think that in my country (Italy) a good option could be to use AS tires in the winter and Summer tires in summer...

    #5135
    1. TyreReviews Paolo Cavarzere archived

      I've been recommended all season tyres as winter tyres for a while now, especially summer bias all season like the CrossClimate to the warmer parts of Europe.

      #5138
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.