The 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test has tested nine popular all season tyres in 215/55 R17.
Test Publication:
Auto Zeitung
215/55 R17
9 tyres
5 categories
Test Size:
215/55 R17
Tyres Tested:
9 tyres
Auto Zeitung is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
Dry
The test measures the stopping distance of tyres on a dry surface. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 performed the best with a braking distance of 36m, while the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert had the longest distance at 41.8m, indicating a variance in dry braking performance among different tyre brands.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
Evaluating the handling characteristics under dry conditions, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 performed similarly with times around 83.5s and 83.6s respectively, whereas the Kleber Quadraxer 3 lagged at 85.5s.
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
Wet
In wet conditions, the braking distances ranged from 40.8m for the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 to 49m for the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2, showing a notable difference in wet braking efficiency among the tyres tested.
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
This test assessed the tyres' handling performance on a wet track. Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Kleber Quadraxer 3 were on the higher end with times over 101s, while Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 had a better time at 94.4s.
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
Tyres were tested on a wet circular track with times ranging from 15.6s for Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 and Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 to 16.4s for Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Nexen N Blue 4Season 2, depicting a small variance in performance.
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
The test measures aquaplaning resistance, with Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 achieving the highest speed of 84.2 Km/H, contrasting with Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 and Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus which were below 75 Km/H.
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Snow
Snow braking distances ranged from 24.9m for Kleber Quadraxer 3 to 26.5m for Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2, indicating the tyres' varying efficiency in snowy conditions.
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
The force required to move the tyres on snow varied, with Michelin CrossClimate 2 requiring 2727N and Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 requiring only 2442N, showing a difference in snow traction among the tyres.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
In snow handling, Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 had the longest time at 56.9s, while Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Kleber Quadraxer 3 performed better with times around 51.5s and 51.8s respectively.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
This test evaluated the tyres' agility in snowy conditions, with Michelin CrossClimate 2 achieving the highest value of 3.99m/sec^2, contrasting with Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 at 3.51m/sec^2.
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
Comfort
The comfort ratings were subjective, with Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 scoring 12 points, the highest among the tyres, and Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 scoring the lowest at 6 points.
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Noise levels varied with Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 being the quietest at 64dB and Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 being the loudest at 69dB, indicating a difference in noise comfort among the tyres.
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
- Michelin CrossClimate 2
- Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kleber Quadraxer 3
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Value
Lower rolling resistance indicates better fuel efficiency. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 had the lowest rolling resistance at 6.73kg/t, while Pirelli had the highest at 8.75kg/t. It's important to note that the Pirelli tyre was the SEAL inside puncture resistant version which is a heavier tyre with higher rolling resistance than the standard tyre.
Results
Consistent strong performance across all criteria. No compromises required. Test winner.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
38.5 M |
36 M |
+2.5 M |
93.51% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
83.6 s |
83.5 s |
+0.1 s |
99.88% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
43.5 M |
40.8 M |
+2.7 M |
93.79% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
98.5 s |
94.4 s |
+4.1 s |
95.84% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
15.6 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-4.2 Km/H |
95.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
25.1 M |
24.9 M |
+0.2 M |
99.2% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
2666 N |
2727 N |
-61 N |
97.76% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
53.5 s |
51.5 s |
+2 s |
96.26% |
| Snow Slalom |
3rd |
3.72 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.27 m/sec2 |
93.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
9 Points |
12 Points |
-3 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
8th |
69 dB |
64 dB |
+5 dB |
92.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.27 kg / t |
96.14% |
Excellent in snow and dry conditions. Moderate wet performance but has low rolling resistance. Efficient.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
84.3 s |
83.5 s |
+0.8 s |
99.05% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
43.6 M |
40.8 M |
+2.8 M |
93.58% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
101.6 s |
94.4 s |
+7.2 s |
92.91% |
| Wet Circle |
6th |
16.2 s |
15.6 s |
+0.6 s |
96.3% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
81.1 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
96.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
25.2 M |
24.9 M |
+0.3 M |
98.81% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
2727 N |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
51.5 s |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Slalom |
1st |
3.99 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
11 Points |
12 Points |
-1 Points |
91.67% |
| Noise |
2nd |
65 dB |
64 dB |
+1 dB |
98.46% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
6.73 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Older model but performs well on wet and dry roads. Cost-effective, securing a strong third place.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
37.5 M |
36 M |
+1.5 M |
96% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
83.5 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
43 M |
40.8 M |
+2.2 M |
94.88% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
99.9 s |
94.4 s |
+5.5 s |
94.49% |
| Wet Circle |
4th |
16 s |
15.6 s |
+0.4 s |
97.5% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
76.9 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-7.3 Km/H |
91.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
25.5 M |
24.9 M |
+0.6 M |
97.65% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
2562 N |
2727 N |
-165 N |
93.95% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
54.4 s |
51.5 s |
+2.9 s |
94.67% |
| Snow Slalom |
6th |
3.67 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.32 m/sec2 |
91.98% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
3rd |
10 Points |
12 Points |
-2 Points |
83.33% |
| Noise |
6th |
68 dB |
64 dB |
+4 dB |
94.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.02 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+1.29 kg / t |
83.92% |
Exceptional on snow, strong on dry roads. Significant weaknesses in wet conditions, not recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
37.2 M |
36 M |
+1.2 M |
96.77% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
85.5 s |
83.5 s |
+2 s |
97.66% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
46.1 M |
40.8 M |
+5.3 M |
88.5% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
102.8 s |
94.4 s |
+8.4 s |
91.83% |
| Wet Circle |
8th |
16.4 s |
15.6 s |
+0.8 s |
95.12% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
81.7 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
24.9 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
2687 N |
2727 N |
-40 N |
98.53% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
51.8 s |
51.5 s |
+0.3 s |
99.42% |
| Snow Slalom |
2nd |
3.98 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.01 m/sec2 |
99.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
6th |
8 Points |
12 Points |
-4 Points |
66.67% |
| Noise |
4th |
67 dB |
64 dB |
+3 dB |
95.52% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.4 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.67 kg / t |
90.95% |
Note: This was the SEAL version of the tyre which gave it a higher than usual rolling resistance.
Unbeatable on wet roads, but weak in snow. High rolling resistance lands it in fifth place.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
36.7 M |
36 M |
+0.7 M |
98.09% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
84.5 s |
83.5 s |
+1 s |
98.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
40.8 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
98.6 s |
94.4 s |
+4.2 s |
95.74% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
15.6 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
81.8 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.15% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
26.5 M |
24.9 M |
+1.6 M |
93.96% |
| Snow Traction |
9th |
2442 N |
2727 N |
-285 N |
89.55% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
55.3 s |
51.5 s |
+3.8 s |
93.13% |
| Snow Slalom |
4th |
3.71 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.28 m/sec2 |
92.98% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
12 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Noise |
1st |
64 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.75 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+2.02 kg / t |
76.91% |
Balanced but not exceptional. Could improve on wet grip and braking power.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
39.4 M |
36 M |
+3.4 M |
91.37% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
84.3 s |
83.5 s |
+0.8 s |
99.05% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
43.5 M |
40.8 M |
+2.7 M |
93.79% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
100.8 s |
94.4 s |
+6.4 s |
93.65% |
| Wet Circle |
4th |
16 s |
15.6 s |
+0.4 s |
97.5% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
74.3 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-9.9 Km/H |
88.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
25.7 M |
24.9 M |
+0.8 M |
96.89% |
| Snow Traction |
6th |
2557 N |
2727 N |
-170 N |
93.77% |
| Snow Handling |
3rd |
53.3 s |
51.5 s |
+1.8 s |
96.62% |
| Snow Slalom |
8th |
3.62 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.37 m/sec2 |
90.73% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
7th |
7 Points |
12 Points |
-5 Points |
58.33% |
| Noise |
6th |
68 dB |
64 dB |
+4 dB |
94.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.52 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.79 kg / t |
89.49% |
Balanced performance in all areas, but notably weak in lateral aquaplaning and dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
39.5 M |
36 M |
+3.5 M |
91.14% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
84.2 s |
83.5 s |
+0.7 s |
99.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
44 M |
40.8 M |
+3.2 M |
92.73% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
94.4 s |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
15.6 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
77.4 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-6.8 Km/H |
91.92% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
25.3 M |
24.9 M |
+0.4 M |
98.42% |
| Snow Traction |
4th |
2639 N |
2727 N |
-88 N |
96.77% |
| Snow Handling |
8th |
56.9 s |
51.5 s |
+5.4 s |
90.51% |
| Snow Slalom |
7th |
3.65 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.34 m/sec2 |
91.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
7th |
7 Points |
12 Points |
-5 Points |
58.33% |
| Noise |
4th |
67 dB |
64 dB |
+3 dB |
95.52% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+1.27 kg / t |
84.13% |
Excellent for those concerned about aquaplaning. Limited on snow and long dry braking distance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
41.8 M |
36 M |
+5.8 M |
86.12% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
85.3 s |
83.5 s |
+1.8 s |
97.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
43.7 M |
40.8 M |
+2.9 M |
93.36% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
101.8 s |
94.4 s |
+7.4 s |
92.73% |
| Wet Circle |
7th |
16.3 s |
15.6 s |
+0.7 s |
95.71% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
84.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
25.5 M |
24.9 M |
+0.6 M |
97.65% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
2514 N |
2727 N |
-213 N |
92.19% |
| Snow Handling |
9th |
57 s |
51.5 s |
+5.5 s |
90.35% |
| Snow Slalom |
9th |
3.51 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.48 m/sec2 |
87.97% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
4th |
9 Points |
12 Points |
-3 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
3rd |
66 dB |
64 dB |
+2 dB |
96.97% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.14 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+0.41 kg / t |
94.26% |
Affordable, acceptable in snow but lacks grip on wet roads.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
37.9 M |
36 M |
+1.9 M |
94.99% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
84 s |
83.5 s |
+0.5 s |
99.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
49 M |
40.8 M |
+8.2 M |
83.27% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
102.5 s |
94.4 s |
+8.1 s |
92.1% |
| Wet Circle |
8th |
16.4 s |
15.6 s |
+0.8 s |
95.12% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
74.2 Km/H |
84.2 Km/H |
-10 Km/H |
88.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
25.6 M |
24.9 M |
+0.7 M |
97.27% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
2493 N |
2727 N |
-234 N |
91.42% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
56.5 s |
51.5 s |
+5 s |
91.15% |
| Snow Slalom |
5th |
3.69 m/sec2 |
3.99 m/sec2 |
-0.3 m/sec2 |
92.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
9th |
6 Points |
12 Points |
-6 Points |
50% |
| Noise |
8th |
69 dB |
64 dB |
+5 dB |
92.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
7.8 kg / t |
6.73 kg / t |
+1.07 kg / t |
86.28% |
Ok. 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test.
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
Wet Braking 1st
Wet Circle 1st
Subj. Comfort 1st
Noise 1st
Rolling Resistance 1st
Placed 5th, with comment "Unbeatable on wet roads, but weak in snow. High rolling resistance lands it in fifth place." High rolling resistance? Please, read again Rolling Resistance test. 1st!
And, all-season tyres are not winter tyres. People who live in snowy areas will certainly not buy all-season tyres. Therefore, the fact that they are not very good in the snow should not push them to the fifth place.
It is the only tyre to win in five categories.
In my opinion, they should be the first.
There was an issue with the rolling resistance table, that's been updated and it was last in that test.
But i agree with you, the German testers care too much about the snow performance in their scoring system.
Also worth noting that the rolling resistance was affected as it was the seal inside version of the tyre