Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 vs Firestone Destination AT2
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Firestone Destination AT2 finished ahead 2 times and the Geolandar AT G015 not once. The Geolandar AT G015 was stronger in dry, the Destination AT2 in wet, snow, off road and value.
Performance profile
20 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Geolandar AT G015
Destination AT2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Geolandar AT G015
Destination AT2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Geolandar AT G015
Destination AT2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Geolandar AT G015 78% from 47 reviews and the Destination AT2 83% from 7. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | Geolandar AT G015 | Gap | Destination AT2 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Geolandar AT G015 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 44 | 2.7% | 45.2 | 1-0 |
| Dry Handling s | 68.99 | 0.1% | 69.06 | 1-0 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Wet Destination AT2 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 60.45 | 3.1% | 58.55 | 0-1 |
| Wet Handling s | 82.28 | 0.8% | 81.59 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | scored | 5.9% | scored | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 13.53 | 1.7% | 13.3 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 85.4 | 0.6% | 85.9 | 0-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.34 | 8.7% | 3.63 | 0-1 |
| Snow Destination AT2 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 51.55 | 11.7% | 45.5 | 0-2 |
| Snow Traction s | 6.07 | 16.5% | 5.07 | 0-2 |
| Snow Handling s | 101.8 | 4% | 97.73 | 0-2 |
| Off road Destination AT2 ahead | ||||
| Gravel Handling s | 62.47 | 1.1% | 61.77 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Gravel Handling pts | scored | 11.8% | scored | 0-1 |
| Dirt Handling s | 58.41 | 0.9% | 57.91 | 0-1 |
| Subj. Dirt Handling pts | scored | 5.6% | scored | 0-1 |
| Comfort Level | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 5.3% | scored | 1-0 |
| Subj. Noise pts | scored | = | scored | 0-0 |
| Noise dB | 73.2 | 0.4 dB | 72.8 | 0-1 |
| Value Destination AT2 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.56 | 11.9% | 8.42 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests, 2022 to 2023
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Geolandar AT G015 | Field | Destination AT2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023/24 Best All Terrain Tyres In Snow | P3 of 7 | P2 of 7 | |
| 2022/23 Best 9 All Terrain Tyres | P5 of 9 | P1 of 9 |
Geolandar AT G015 vs Destination AT2: your questions
Is the Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 or the Firestone Destination AT2 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Firestone Destination AT2 finished ahead 2 times and the Geolandar AT G015 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Geolandar AT G015 scores 8 and the Destination AT2 8.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Geolandar AT G015 or the Destination AT2?
The Destination AT2 led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Geolandar AT G015 led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Destination AT2 led 6 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it was 16.5% quicker in the snow traction test across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.5/10 for the Geolandar AT G015 and 8.7/10 for the Destination AT2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Geolandar AT G015 78% from 47 reviews and the Destination AT2 83% from 7. 77% of Geolandar AT G015 owners would buy it again, against 83% for the Destination AT2.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.