Bridgestone Noranza 001 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Ahead in each discipline
The Bridgestone Noranza 001 and the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 have met in one independent test so far, and the Hakkapeliitta 10 finished ahead. The Hakkapeliitta 10 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice and comfort.
Performance profile
10 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Noranza 001
Hakkapeliitta 10
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
Noranza 001
Hakkapeliitta 10
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Noranza 001 | Gap | Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Hakkapeliitta 10 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 31.5 | 0.3% | 31.4 |
| Wet Hakkapeliitta 10 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 36 | 0.3% | 35.9 |
| Wet Handling s | 35.8 | 1.4% | 35.3 |
| Snow Hakkapeliitta 10 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 51.9 | 0.8% | 51.5 |
| Snow Traction s | 5.8 | 1.7% | 5.9 |
| Snow Handling s | 53.4 | 0.2% | 53.3 |
| Ice Hakkapeliitta 10 ahead | |||
| Ice Braking m | 39 | 6.7% | 36.4 |
| Ice Traction s | 3.7 | 2.7% | 3.6 |
| Ice Handling s | 55.8 | 3% | 54.1 |
| Comfort Hakkapeliitta 10 ahead | |||
| Subj. Noise pts | 6 | 16.7% | 7 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Noranza 001 | Field | Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 9 | P1 of 9 |
Noranza 001 vs Hakkapeliitta 10: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Noranza 001 or the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 the better tyre?
The Bridgestone Noranza 001 and the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 have met in one independent test so far, and the Hakkapeliitta 10 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Noranza 001 scores 6.8 and the Hakkapeliitta 10 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Noranza 001 or the Hakkapeliitta 10?
The Hakkapeliitta 10 led 2 of the 2 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Hakkapeliitta 10 led 1 of the 1 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Hakkapeliitta 10 led 2 of the 3 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Hakkapeliitta 10 75% from 10 reviews; the Noranza 001 has no owner reviews yet.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Michelin X Ice North 4 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
2-2 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental IceContact 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs
Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
2-1 in 6 shared tests
vs
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
2-0 in 4 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
2-0 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.