Menu

Bridgestone Noranza 001

The Bridgestone Noranza 001 is a Premium Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

0.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
0%
Wet Grip
0%
Road Feedback
0%
Handling
0%
Wear
0%
Comfort
0%
Buy again
0%
Snow Grip
0%
Ice Grip
0%
4 Tests (avg: 6th)
Bridgestone Noranza 001

Bridgestone Noranza 001

Winter Premium
BETA
0.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
89.4
1.26x / 13 tests
Snow
76.2
1.5x / 13 tests
Value
69.6
0.38x / 3 tests
Wet
58
2x / 9 tests
Dry
54.1
1.2x / 6 tests
Comfort
46.2
0.29x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
87.8
8 tests
Handling
76.7
16 tests
Braking
65.9
16 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 4
Period: 2018 - 2021
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 0
Avg Rating: 0%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.47
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2021 205/55 R16 5/16 11 metrics
2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test Test World 2020 205/55 R16 5/20 15 metrics
2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2019 225/50 R17 7/8 11 metrics
2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2018 205/55 R16 5/8 9 metrics
4
Tests
6th
Average
5th
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
[Studded] Good on ice, short dry braking.
Poor grip in the wet, high noise.
Good overall performance on ice, stable snow performance.
Long braking distances in the snow, dry and wet, inaccurate steering response and oversteer in the dry.
7th/8
Low rolling resistance.
Long dry braking.
Acceptable grip on ice, but poor in the snow and long dry braking.

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Noranza 001

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Noranza 001. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Have you driven on the Bridgestone Noranza 001 tyre?

Unfortunately we don't yet have any tyre reviews of the Bridgestone Noranza 001 but people are searching for information on it.

Please help millions of other drivers make an informed tyre choice and pick the correct tyres for their car by submitting your review of the Noranza 001.

Review Your Tyres >>