Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 finished ahead 3 times and the WinterPro2 Evo once. The UltraGrip Performance 3 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, comfort and value, the WinterPro2 Evo in ice.
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
UltraGrip Performance 3
WinterPro2 Evo
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
WinterPro2 Evo
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | WinterPro2 Evo | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry UltraGrip Performance 3 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 44.1 | 2.2% | 45.1 | 3-0 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 109.6 | 1.2% | 108.3 | 1-0 |
| Wet UltraGrip Performance 3 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 41.65 | 1.2% | 42 | 2-2 |
| Wet Braking - Concrete m | 39.65 | 6.2% | 42.25 | 2-0 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 74.81 | 2.8% | 72.77 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.41 | 2.4% | 12.71 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 87.97 | 11% | 79.17 | 3-0 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 3.84 | 31.1% | 2.93 | 3-0 |
| Snow UltraGrip Performance 3 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 19.75 | 1% | 19.83 | 2-2 |
| Snow Traction N | 1,848 | 0.4% | 1,842 | 2-1 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 59.9 | 0.8% | 60.4 | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.23 | 0.6% | 3.21 | 1-0 |
| Ice WinterPro2 Evo ahead | ||||
| Ice Braking m | 21.9 | 5.7% | 20.65 | 0-2 |
| Comfort UltraGrip Performance 3 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 70.83 | 0.4 dB | 71.2 | 2-0 |
| Value UltraGrip Performance 3 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 42,867 | 21.2% | 35,078 | 3-0 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.2 | 6.7% | 8.79 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.35 | 0.1% | 5.35 | 1-1 |
| Abrasion mg/km/t | 67 | 24.4% | 89.5 | 2-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Field | WinterPro2 Evo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | P6 of 16 | P7 of 16 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 20 | P16 of 20 | |
| 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 12 | P9 of 12 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P9 of 55 | P3 of 55 |
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs WinterPro2 Evo: your questions
Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo the better tyre?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 finished ahead 3 times and the WinterPro2 Evo once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the WinterPro2 Evo 8.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the UltraGrip Performance 3 or the WinterPro2 Evo?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 12 of the 14 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 31.1% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 4 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 5 of the 9 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 21.2% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and shed 24.4% less rubber in the abrasion test (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 10/10 for the WinterPro2 Evo.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 8/10 for the WinterPro2 Evo.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the WinterPro2 Evo 87% from 1.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the UltraGrip Performance 3 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 29.2% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 18 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7-16 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Alpin 7
8-4 in 12 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
11-2 in 13 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-8 in 8 shared tests
vs
Barum Polaris 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
1-4 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the UltraGrip Performance 3 Review the WinterPro2 Evo
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.