Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 90% · 15
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 77% · 28
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 finished ahead 11 times and the Winter I cept RS3 twice. The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 12.6% longer in the wear tests; the Winter I cept RS3 resisted straight aquaplaning at a 1.5% higher speed.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 if you want the most dependable all-round winter tyre-particularly for mixed conditions (wet + slush + real snow), strong braking/handling confidence and lower cabin noise. Choose the Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 if your priority is maximum aquaplaning security and strong value for money in a predominantly wet winter climate, and you can accept that braking/handling consistency (and in some sizes, tread life) may not match the Goodyear.
Where the UltraGrip Performance 3 is stronger
- Consistently higher overall performance across tests (wins 11 of 13 shared tests), with strong balance rather than one “headline” strength
- Stronger braking performance overall, especially in the dry (10 category wins to 1) and often competitive wet braking (8 wins to 4)
- More confidence-inspiring wet handling and steering feel (wet handling wins 6 to 0; strong subjective wet scores in multiple tests)
Where the Winter I cept RS3 is stronger
- Class-leading aquaplaning resilience, especially straight-line (straight aquaplaning wins 7 to 3) and frequently strong in curved aquaplaning
- Strong value proposition: often cheaper or better value-per-performance (e.g., AvD value metric advantage; described as value pick in Sport Auto/AMS context)
- Can be very competitive on snow in some programmes (notably snow braking/traction in Auto Express tests; snow braking category edges overall 5 wins to 4)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Winter I cept RS3 at a glance
| Category | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | Winter I cept RS3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won13 shared tests | 11 | 2 | |
| Dry19 measurements | 13 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry (11 tests) | 5 |
| Wet47 measurements | 29 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped 1% shorter in the wet (12 tests) | 17 |
| Snow34 measurements | 21 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 averaged a 1.6% higher speed on the snow handling course (3 tests) | 10 |
| Ice4 measurements | 1 | The Winter I cept RS3 stopped 2.3% shorter on ice (4 tests) | 3 |
| Comfort13 measurements | 10 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 was 1.4 dB quieter (9 tests) | 0 |
| Value20 measurements | 11 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 12.6% longer in the wear tests (6 tests) | 8 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 0.7 | 8.8/10 |
| Owner rating15 and 28 reviews | 90% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 13 points | 77% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 100% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 26 points | 74% |
| Pricein the 10 tests that listed prices | +25.1% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 was dearer in 10 of 10 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 175 | 27 sizes made in both | 46 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 13 tests, 2024 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Field | Winter I cept RS3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 | P1 of 9 | P7 of 9 | |
| 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2026 AvD Winter Tyre Test | P3 of 15 | P7 of 15 | |
| 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 | P3 of 16 | P6 of 16 | |
| 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | P6 of 16 | P3 of 16 | |
| 2026 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | P6 of 11 | P3 of 11 | |
| 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P4 of 10 | |
| 2024 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 7 | P3 of 7 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 20 | P6 of 20 | |
| 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | P1 of 16 | P5 of 16 | |
| 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test | P2 of 12 | P4 of 12 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | P9 of 55 | P14 of 55 |
Performance profile
28 measurements from the 13 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
UltraGrip Performance 3
Winter I cept RS3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 1 measurement recorded in only one shared test is left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
Winter I cept RS3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
Winter I cept RS3
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Winter I cept RS3 77% from 28. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | Winter I cept RS3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.67 | 2.5% | 44.78 | 10-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65.76 | 0.9% | 65.21 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 112.5 | 0.1% | 112.4 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.6% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39.13 | 1% | 39.6 | 8-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39.65 | 3.2% | 40.98 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 94.85 | 1.1% | 95.91 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.64 | 1.4% | 71.6 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 26.8% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.67 | 0.2% | 7.66 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.37 | 1.6% | 12.57 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83.25 | 1.5% | 84.43 | 3-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.37 | 2.4% | 3.44 | 2-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19.3 | 0.5% | 19.36 | 4-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.61 | 0.7% | 5.64 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,657 | 3.5% | 1,635 | 5-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 76.18 | 0.9% | 76.94 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 82.1 | 1.6% | 80.7 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 29.4% | scored | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.28 | 3.1% | 4.15 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.55 | 0.6% | 3.56 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 20.03 | 2.3% | 19.53 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 14.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.67 | 1.4 dB | 70.03 | 9-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48,967 | 12.6% | 44,145 | 4-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.17 | 0.7% | 8.22 | 3-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.43 | 0.5% | 5.47 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62.75 | 4.7% | 67.5 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the Winter I cept RS3 8.8 out of 10.
| UltraGrip Performance 3 | Category | Winter I cept RS3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Dry | 60 | ||
| 95 | Wet | 93 | ||
| 85 | Comfort | 36 | ||
| 70 | Value | 52 | ||
| 87 | Snow | 75 | ||
| 22 | Ice | 33 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| UltraGrip Performance 3 | Category | Winter I cept RS3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 8.8 | Wet Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 8.6 | Road Feedback | 7.6 | ||
| 8.1 | Handling | 8 | ||
| 9 | Wear | 7.6 | ||
| 8.8 | Comfort | 6.7 | ||
| 9.5 | Snow Grip | 9 | ||
| 8.1 | Ice Grip | 7.7 | ||
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Winter I cept RS3 77% from 28. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
- 90%from 15 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 62,800 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers rate the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 very highly, praising its excellent grip and braking on dry and wet roads, strong traction in snow, and a quiet, comfortable, and predictable ride. Handling is often described as stable and confidence-inspiring, with several noting good highway manners. A minority mention weaker performance on pure ice and a softer, less sporty steering feel at the limit. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with only a few caveats.
- strong dry grip and braking
- excellent wet grip and braking
- very good snow traction
- quiet and comfortable ride
- limited grip on pure ice compared to some rivals
- softer steering feel and less sporty lateral grip at high speeds
Summarised by AI from 12 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 15 UltraGrip Performance 3 reviewsThis is exceptional tyre in winter i swapped it now with Michelin PA 5 which is even better on snow but lucks a bit on wet. But you cant go wrong with niether of those. I cant wait Michelin s to worn out so i can try pirelli.
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
- 77%from 28 reviews
- 74%would buy again
- 156,320 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 as a capable winter tyre with strong real-world grip, particularly in snow and wet conditions, backed up by solid dry grip and handling for a winter pattern. Around two in five owners specifically praise snow traction and wet grip, and a smaller but meaningful group also mention confident aquaplaning resistance and wet handling. The standout drawback is road noise: nearly two thirds of owners mention it and most of those are unhappy, often describing it as noticeably loud at speed. A smaller group also report softer, less responsive steering feel, with mixed feedback on tread life.
- Strong snow traction and confidence in winter conditions
- Reassuring wet grip
- Very good dry grip for a winter tyre
- Secure wet handling
- Noticeably loud road noise, especially at speed
- Steering feels soft / less responsive
- Mixed or disappointing tread life
Summarised by AI from 25 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 28 Winter I cept RS3 reviewsI drove some 13000 km with them, once they got 3 years old dry rot cracks were already visible in the tread area around the tread blocks, my winter tires before them were Continental TS850 replaced at 10 years old, gave them away to my father, they were made in 2012, still no dry rot cracks in them at 14 years old, but they aren't as grippy as my new Hankooks. However, Continental is a premium class, Hankooks are middle and now I can see why.
What I misjudged about Hankooks is noise above some 95 km/h, it's more the engine getting more noisy similar noise to the tyres humming excessively, once I distinguished that, I can say these Hankooks aren't noisy at all. However, dry rot at just 3 years old is not what I like, I almost wish I paid 80 euros per tyre for premium class instead 60 for these Hankooks, they surely aren't going to last me 10 years due to dry rot. But for now, they do their job well, if you wear out tyres within a few years, they are good tyres
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 175 sizes of the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 46 of the Winter I cept RS3, 27 of them made in both.
| Category | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Winter I cept RS3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 175 sizes, 14 to 23 inch | 46 sizes, 14 to 17 inch |
| Made in both | 27 sizes 175/65 R14175/65 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15185/50 R16185/55 R16185/60 R16195/55 R16195/60 R16205/45 R16and 15 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B60%C39%D0%A0% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C74%B16%D9%A1%E0% | C58%D42% |
| EU label noise | 69-74 dB B87%A13% | 70-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 415 of 415 | 189 of 189 |
| Replaced | - | Hankook Winter i cept RS2 (2021) |
| Awards | Commended: Best Winter Tyre (DriverReviews, 2025/26) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The UltraGrip Performance 3 was the dearer tyre in 10 of the 10 tests that listed prices, by 25.1% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance 3 and Hankook's Winter i*cept RS3 sit in the same “premium winter” conversation, but they're built with slightly different priorities. The Goodyear is positioned as an ultra-high-performance winter option, aiming for a broad spread of grip, stability and refinement, while the Hankook leans more premium-touring/value-often targeting secure wet-road manners and strong aquaplaning resistance at a sharper price.
Across 13 shared professional tests in multiple sizes, the story isn't simply “one is good, one is bad.” It's a consistent pattern: the Goodyear tends to score higher overall thanks to stronger balance in braking, wet handling and refinement, while the Hankook repeatedly produces standout results in deep-water aquaplaning metrics and can be very competitive on snow braking in certain tests. The result is a choice between all-round “top-table” performance versus a more water-focused, cost-effective alternative that comes with a few trade-offs.
Conclusion
Looking across the full set of shared tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is the more consistently high-ranking tyre: it leads the head-to-head overall in 11 of 13 shared tests and takes the big headline win in “The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27” (1st of 9 vs Hankook 7th). Its advantages show up where it matters most for everyday safety and confidence: dry braking (10 category wins to 1), wet handling (6 to 0), cabin noise (9 to 0), and generally stronger subjective control on snow. In several tests the gaps are meaningful rather than marginal-for example in the 2026 Sport Auto test the Goodyear's snow traction advantage is large (1.31 vs 1.10, ~19%), and in AvD it also pairs performance with notably better projected wear (51,899 km vs 45,721 km).
The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3's recurring “signature” is water security and value. It wins straight aquaplaning far more often (7 wins to Goodyear's 3), frequently performs strongly in curved aquaplaning, and it's regularly positioned as a smart buy when budgets matter (e.g., AvD value: 9.62 vs 11.66 price/1000 in Hankook's favour). It can also be genuinely strong on snow in specific test programmes (Auto Express 2026: best snow braking and strong traction), but its results are less uniform: multiple reports cite longer dry/wet braking than the leaders, and several note handling traits like understeer on snow or a less “biting” front end in the wet.
Practical takeaway: if you want the safer, quieter, more consistently “top-tier” winter tyre that rarely has a weak chapter-especially when conditions vary between cold wet roads, slush and real snow-the Goodyear is the clearer all-round pick. If your winters are dominated by heavy rain/standing water and you want strong aquaplaning resistance with good overall competence at a better price, the Hankook makes sense-just accept that depending on size and test, it may give up some braking/handling sharpness and, in some datasets, tread life.
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Winter I cept RS3: your questions
Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 the better tyre?
In the 13 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 finished ahead 11 times and the Winter I cept RS3 twice. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the Winter I cept RS3 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the UltraGrip Performance 3 or the Winter I cept RS3?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 29 of the 47 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1% shorter in the wet across 12 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 13 of the 19 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter in the dry across 11 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 21 of the 34 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it averaged a 1.6% higher speed on the snow handling course across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 12.6% longer in the wear tests (6 tests) and shed 4.7% less rubber in the abrasion test (4 tests); the Winter I cept RS3 had 0.7% lower rolling resistance (7 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 7.6/10 for the Winter I cept RS3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 was 1.4 dB quieter (9 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 6.7/10 for the Winter I cept RS3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Winter I cept RS3 77% from 28. 100% of UltraGrip Performance 3 owners would buy it again, against 74% for the Winter I cept RS3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 10 tests that listed prices, the UltraGrip Performance 3 was the dearer tyre in 10 of them, by 25.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 is made in 175 sizes (14 to 23 inch) and the Winter I cept RS3 in 46 (14 to 17 inch). 27 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the UltraGrip Performance 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter I cept RS3 B and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 18 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7-16 in 24 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Alpin 7
8-4 in 12 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-8 in 8 shared tests
Every Goodyear vs Hankook test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the UltraGrip Performance 3 Review the Winter I cept RS3
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion