Menu

Test source Auto Express

2026 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test

Overall test winnerContinental WinterContact TS 870

Auto Express has returned to 205/55 R16 for its 2026 winter tyre test, the size it last used for winter tyres in 2024 and still the biggest seller in the UK.

Tyres tested
11
Tested size
205/55 R16
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

11 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 870

+The Continental WinterContact TS 870 was the strongest tyre in the field in the wet, topping braking, cornering on the circle and the handling lap, and doing it with clear margins rather than fractions. It was also the quietest tyre in the cabin, and backed the wet result up with a top-five snow stop, a top-four snow lap and good rolling resistance. Testers found it easy to place, with strong turn-in and traction and smooth transitions at the limit.

−Snow traction was the Continental's one real weakness, where it finished near the bottom of the winter field, and dry braking was only mid-pack. It also sits at the expensive end of the group.

Read full verdict
2nd

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3

+The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 was the most complete tyre in the field behind the winner, tying for the fastest wet handling lap, taking second on the wet circle, topping straight-line aquaplaning and running second in the curved test. It was second in dry braking and joint second on the snow lap, and testers praised its positive turn-in, traction and stability at the limit.

−Snow braking and snow traction were the softest parts of its card, both only mid-field, and it was well down the order on the dry handling lap.

Read full verdict
3rd

Hankook Winter I cept RS3

+The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 was the best tyre in the field on snow, recording the shortest snow stop and following it with second in traction and joint second on the snow lap. It was second in wet braking and second in straight-line aquaplaning, third in the curved test, and third quickest on the dry handling lap. Testers described it as calm, precise and easy to catch.

−It was the noisiest tyre in the cabin, its rolling resistance was only mid-field, and it lacked the outright grip of the leaders on the wet handling lap and the wet circle, where it slipped to the lower half of the order.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

+The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was second only to the Hankook in snow braking, shared the fastest dry handling lap and had the second-lowest rolling resistance in the test. Wet cornering and curved aquaplaning were both top-four results, and testers found it stable and controlled on a first lap and genuinely adjustable once pushed.

−It was last of the whole field in dry braking, and a softer turn-in cost it time on both the snow lap and the wet handling lap, where it could only manage mid-field. Straight-line aquaplaning was unremarkable too.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Michelin Alpin 7

+The Michelin Alpin 7 had by a clear margin the lowest rolling resistance in the test, and it was consistently near the front on snow with third in traction and fourth in braking. Wet braking was fourth and the wet handling lap was close to the pace, with testers noting predictable, nose-led balance and strong traction out of the corners.

−Curved aquaplaning was a weak point, cabin noise was near the bottom of the order, and it was well down the field on the dry handling lap. It is also the most expensive tyre here.

Read full verdict
6th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

+The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 was the fastest tyre on the snow handling lap and the best in curved aquaplaning, adding third places on the wet circle and in straight-line aquaplaning. Fourth in snow traction and a close sixth in snow braking made it one of the better snow tyres here, and testers found it strong once loaded and quick to recover from slides.

−It was the slowest of the winter tyres on the dry handling lap and only joint mid-field in wet braking, which carries the most weight of all. Rolling resistance was poor and it is one of the pricier tyres in the group.

Read full verdict
7th

Falken EUROWINTER HS02

+The Falken Eurowinter HS02 was the best tyre in the field in dry braking, and backed that up with a top-five dry handling lap, third on the wet handling lap and fifth in wet braking. It was also among the quietest tyres in the cabin. Testers found it dynamically stable and predictable, if short on outright grip.

−Snow is where it comes apart, ranking near the bottom of the winter field in braking, traction and lap time, which is an odd set of priorities for a winter tyre. Curved aquaplaning was weak as well.

Read full verdict
8th

Dunlop Winter

+The Dunlop Winter was the best tyre in the test in snow traction and third in snow braking, only a fraction behind the leader, so its cold-weather grip in a straight line is genuinely good. Rolling resistance was solid, and testers found it grippy with a willing balance on the wet handling circuit.

−It could only manage lower mid-field on the snow lap, where it gave little bite on turn-in and had an eager rear, and it was among the weakest tyres in wet braking, wet handling and straight-line aquaplaning. It felt unexpectedly loose on the dry lap as well.

Read full verdict
9th

Linglong Sport Master Winter

+The Linglong Sport Master Winter was among the quietest tyres in the cabin and was reasonably competitive on snow, with a top-six lap time and braking and traction results that were not far off the mid-field. Testers found it uncomplicated, with good front-end bite and a stable rear.

−It had the highest rolling resistance in the test by a clear margin, and it was a long way adrift in both aquaplaning tests, particularly the curved one. Wet handling and wet cornering were both near the bottom of the order.

Read full verdict
10th

Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6

+The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 is the cheapest tyre in the test and snow is its strongest surface, where it sat just below the mid-field rather than adrift of it. It was mid-pack on the dry handling lap and delivered modest but predictable grip and responses.

−Wet braking was among the worst in the field and dry braking was little better, while the wet handling lap felt tentative and demanded very gentle throttle inputs to avoid wheelspin. Rolling resistance was poor too.

Read full verdict
11th

Minerva Frostrack HP

+The Minerva Frostrack HP shared the fastest dry handling lap and was third in dry braking, so it is not short of grip on a dry road.

−It was last of the winter tyres in every snow test and every wet test, and its curved aquaplaning result was far worse than anything else here. Testers described the wet handling as poor and the tyre as unpleasant to drive at the limit, and it is not even the cheapest tyre in the group.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2026 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

TyreContinental WinterContact TS 870Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3Hankook Winter I cept RS3Bridgestone Blizzak 6Michelin Alpin 7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3Falken EUROWINTER HS02Dunlop WinterLinglong Sport Master WinterMaxxis Premitra Snow WP6Minerva Frostrack HP
Position1st2nd3rdJoint 4thJoint 4th6th7th8th9th10th11th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry98.5%98.7%98.3%97.4%97.7%97.4%99.8%97.6%97.7%97.5%98.9%
Wet99.5%98.9%97.6%96.8%96.7%97.7%96.5%94.5%93.6%93.5%86%
Snow97.2%97.9%99.7%98.1%99%99.1%94.2%99%96.7%96.3%91.8%
Comfort100%99.7%98.8%99.9%99%99.7%99.9%99.3%99.9%99.1%99.7%
Rolling Resistance90.2%89.6%88.3%94.3%100%87.6%88.7%89.1%77.7%80.4%83.5%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Express has returned to 205/55 R16 for its 2026 winter tyre test, the size it last used for winter tyres in 2024 and still the biggest seller in the UK. Eleven tyres were bought on the open market through an independent German wholesaler. The snow work was done at Hankook's proving ground at Ivalo in Finland, inside the Arctic Circle, at air temperatures between -11°C and -9°C, with the wet and dry testing at Continental's Contidrom in Germany. An all-season tyre and a summer tyre were run alongside the field as references.

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 won, which Auto Express say is its third victory in this size and its fifth in their winter tests since 2021. It topped all three of the wet tests that carry the most weight, straight-line braking, the wet circle and the handling lap, and it was also the quietest tyre in the cabin. The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 finished two tenths of a point behind it in second, the Hankook i'cept RS3 W462 took third, and the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Michelin Alpin 7 tied for fourth.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
40 → 5 km/h

Three results sit awkwardly against the rest of the field. The Falken Eurowinter HS02 recorded the shortest dry braking distance of any winter tyre here and was third quickest around the wet handling circuit, yet finished tenth of eleven in all three snow tests. That is not a one-off: the same pattern shows up in the 2024 ADAC 16 inch winter test in this same size, where it was eleventh of twelve on snow braking, and in the 2025 AMS test, where it was last of ten. The Bridgestone did the reverse, sharing the fastest dry handling lap while stopping last of the whole field in dry braking, and that one is out of character. Its dry braking sits in the upper half of the order in the 2024 Auto Bild winter test and in most of the other tests it has appeared in, so this looks like a soft result rather than a trait. The third is the budget Minerva Frostrack HP, last overall by a wide margin, which was third in dry braking and shared the fastest dry lap while finishing last of the winter tyres in every snow and wet test on the card.

The two reference tyres are worth reading closely. The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 scored higher than the winner on Auto Express's own overall percentage, stopped shorter than every winter tyre in both wet and dry braking, and would have run mid-field on the snow lap and in snow traction, though nearer the back in snow braking. The summer Continental PremiumContact 7 also out-braked every winter tyre in the wet, at a track temperature only a couple of degrees above the 7°C at which winter compounds are usually said to take over, which is a useful reminder that the crossover point is about temperature and not about the calendar. On snow it was in a different category, needing more than twice the distance of the best winter tyre to stop. Neither is included in the ranking.

A note on the numbers below. Auto Express do not publish raw measurements, only each tyre's result as a percentage of the best in that test, so the figures in these charts are built from estimated bests. The percentage difference between the tyres is exact in every case; what is estimated is the absolute number the scale starts from. This test is better anchored than most. Auto Express state the winning snow braking distance of 18.7 metres and the winning dry braking distance of 43.3 metres outright, and the individual tyre reports quote enough absolute gaps to fix wet braking at 33 metres and the snow lap to within a tenth or two. The Continental PremiumContact 7 also ran in the 2026 Auto Express summer test in this same size on the same circuits, so its measurements there set the scale here for wet cornering, both aquaplaning tests, dry handling, cabin noise and rolling resistance. Snow traction is the one figure with no anchor at all and is our own estimate. Because our scoring works on percentages none of this affects the score weighting calculator on the results tab, but it seemed important to share.

The full test, including Auto Express's own driver commentary on every tyre, is on the Auto Express website.

Snow

Snow braking was measured from 40 km/h down to 5 km/h. The Hankook stopped shortest, with the Bridgestone, Dunlop, Michelin and Continental effectively inseparable behind it. Just 1.3 metres covers the entire winter field, so the interesting part is not the order at the front but which tyres drop out of the back of it: the Falken and the Minerva. The summer reference needed 42.2 metres, more than twice the winning distance.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (40 - 5 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
18.7 m Best 0 km/h
18.78 m +0.08 m 8 km/h
18.83 m +0.13 m 11 km/h
18.91 m +0.21 m 14 km/h
18.97 m +0.27 m 16 km/h
19.04 m +0.34 m 17 km/h
19.26 m +0.56 m 22 km/h
19.32 m +0.62 m 23 km/h
19.42 m +0.72 m 25 km/h
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
19.6 m +0.90 m 28 km/h
19.83 m +1.13 m 31 km/h
20.04 m +1.34 m 34 km/h
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
42.21 m +23.51 m 97 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 125.7% (23.51 m ≈ 5.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Minerva Frostrack HP would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, and the scale is anchored on the 18.7 metres they state for the winning tyre.

Snow traction is the time taken to accelerate from 5 km/h to 40 km/h. The Dunlop was quickest, taking its only outright win of the test, with the Hankook, Michelin and Goodyear covered by a few hundredths behind it. The name to note is the Continental: the overall winner placed ninth of the eleven winter tyres, and this is comfortably its weakest result anywhere on the card.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
6 s Best
6.03 s +0.03 s
6.05 s +0.05 s
6.06 s +0.06 s
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
6.15 s +0.15 s
6.19 s +0.19 s
6.21 s +0.21 s
6.31 s +0.31 s
6.36 s +0.36 s
6.37 s +0.37 s
6.55 s +0.55 s
6.75 s +0.75 s
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
18.87 s +12.87 s

The difference between best and worst was 214.5% (12.87 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, but this is the one test in the programme with no absolute figure quoted anywhere, so treat the times themselves as indicative only.

The snow handling lap assesses grip, turn-in, balance and traction, plus stability and recovery from slip. The Goodyear was fastest, with the Hankook and Pirelli tied just behind and the Continental fourth. The Linglong is the surprise here, sixth and ahead of the Bridgestone, while the Falken and the Minerva were both adrift at the back.

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
86 s Best
86.43 s +0.43 s
86.43 s +0.43 s
86.87 s +0.87 s
86.96 s +0.96 s
87.22 s +1.22 s
87.49 s +1.49 s
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
87.67 s +1.67 s
88.02 s +2.02 s
88.02 s +2.02 s
88.93 s +2.93 s
91.98 s +5.98 s
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
127.79 s +41.79 s

The difference between best and worst was 48.6% (41.79 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale they sit on is calculated from four separate lap-time gaps quoted in the Auto Express text, which agree with each other closely.

Wet

Straight-line wet braking from 80 km/h carries more weight than any other single test in the programme, and the Continental won it, stopping in 33 metres against the 33.9 metres of the second-placed Hankook. The Minerva needed 39.5 metres, which is several car lengths further down the road from the same speed. Both reference tyres stopped shorter than every winter tyre in the test.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
27.41 m -5.59 m 0 km/h
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
31.91 m -1.09 m 0 km/h
33 m Best 0 km/h
33.92 m +0.92 m 21 km/h
33.99 m +0.99 m 22 km/h
34.38 m +1.38 m 26 km/h
34.48 m +1.48 m 27 km/h
34.81 m +1.81 m 30 km/h
34.99 m +1.99 m 31 km/h
34.99 m +1.99 m 31 km/h
35.91 m +2.91 m 37 km/h
36.71 m +3.71 m 41 km/h
39.52 m +6.52 m 53 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 44.2% (12.11 m ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Minerva Frostrack HP would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, and the scale is pinned by four separate absolute figures quoted in the Auto Express text.

The wet handling circuit rewards grip, traction, composure under braking and predictable breakaway. The Continental and the Pirelli tied for the fastest lap, the Falken was third, and the Hankook could only manage seventh despite its strong braking and aquaplaning results. The Minerva was a long way off, several seconds a lap slower than anything else.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
85.53 s -1.97 s
87.5 s Best
87.5 s Best
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
87.68 s +0.18 s
88.21 s +0.71 s
88.56 s +1.06 s
88.83 s +1.33 s
88.83 s +1.33 s
89.19 s +1.69 s
90.67 s +3.17 s
90.77 s +3.27 s
90.96 s +3.46 s
95.52 s +8.02 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (9.99 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale is estimated from the lap-time gaps in the Auto Express text and is the one figure here that does not agree with the summer test's scale, so treat the absolute times as indicative.

Wet cornering was timed on a 57.5 metres diameter wetted circle. The Continental led again, with the Pirelli and Goodyear close behind, and the Minerva last. This is a tight test in which the whole field sits within about a second.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
11.52 s -0.58 s
12.1 s Best
12.17 s +0.07 s
12.19 s +0.09 s
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
12.36 s +0.26 s
12.37 s +0.27 s
12.42 s +0.32 s
12.44 s +0.34 s
12.46 s +0.36 s
12.58 s +0.48 s
12.66 s +0.56 s
12.71 s +0.61 s
13.02 s +0.92 s

The difference between best and worst was 13% (1.5 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale comes from the reference tyre's measurement in the 2026 Auto Express summer test.

Straight-line aquaplaning is the speed at which a tyre running through 9mm of standing water reaches 15 per cent slip. The Pirelli was best, with the Hankook and Goodyear behind it, and the Continental fourth. The Linglong and the Minerva were both well off the pace, and the Minerva by a long way.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
85.6 km/h Best
84.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
83.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
82.7 km/h -2.90 km/h
80.8 km/h -4.80 km/h
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
80.6 km/h -5.00 km/h
80 km/h -5.60 km/h
78.5 km/h -7.10 km/h
78.1 km/h -7.50 km/h
77.6 km/h -8.00 km/h
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
76.9 km/h -8.70 km/h
73.3 km/h -12.30 km/h
67.2 km/h -18.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 21.5% (18.4 Km/H).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale comes from the reference tyre's measurement in the 2026 Auto Express summer test.

Curved aquaplaning is the average residual lateral acceleration through a bend flooded to 5mm, driven between 60 km/h and 90 km/h. The Goodyear won it, with the Pirelli, Hankook and Bridgestone close behind. The Minerva's result is the worst of the test by a very wide margin, at roughly half the grip of the leaders.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.5 m/sec2 Best
3.46 m/sec2 -0.04 m/sec2
3.43 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
3.41 m/sec2 -0.09 m/sec2
3.38 m/sec2 -0.12 m/sec2
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
3.31 m/sec2 -0.19 m/sec2
3.3 m/sec2 -0.20 m/sec2
3.21 m/sec2 -0.29 m/sec2
3.2 m/sec2 -0.30 m/sec2
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
3.19 m/sec2 -0.31 m/sec2
3.16 m/sec2 -0.34 m/sec2
2.79 m/sec2 -0.71 m/sec2
1.84 m/sec2 -1.66 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 47.4% (1.66 m/sec2).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale comes from the reference tyre's measurement in the 2026 Auto Express summer test.

Dry

Dry braking was measured from 100 km/h to a standstill. The Falken stopped shortest at 43.3 metres, with the Pirelli just behind it, and the Bridgestone was last of the whole field at 45.7 metres. Only 2.4 metres covers the eleven winter tyres, and the budget Minerva was third. For context, the all-season reference stopped in 38.8 metres and the summer reference in 36 metres.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
35.99 m -7.31 m 0 km/h
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
38.8 m -4.50 m 0 km/h
43.3 m Best 0 km/h
44 m +0.70 m 16 km/h
44.32 m +1.02 m 20 km/h
44.5 m +1.20 m 21 km/h
44.78 m +1.48 m 24 km/h
44.92 m +1.62 m 25 km/h
45.01 m +1.71 m 25 km/h
45.01 m +1.71 m 25 km/h
45.1 m +1.80 m 26 km/h
45.29 m +1.99 m 27 km/h
45.72 m +2.42 m 30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 27% (9.73 m ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 would still be travelling at 30 km/h when the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact, and the scale is anchored on the 43.3 metres Auto Express state for the winning tyre.

The dry handling lap is a one-mile section mixing fast and slow corners. The Bridgestone and the Minerva tied for the fastest time, with the Hankook and Continental next, and the Goodyear was the slowest of the winter tyres. Eight tenths of a second covers the entire winter field, so this test does very little to separate them.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
53.95 s -3.35 s
57.3 s Best
57.3 s Best
57.41 s +0.11 s
57.53 s +0.23 s
57.59 s +0.29 s
57.7 s +0.40 s
57.7 s +0.40 s
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
57.82 s +0.52 s
57.88 s +0.58 s
57.88 s +0.58 s
57.94 s +0.64 s
58.11 s +0.81 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (4.16 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale comes from the reference tyre's measurement in the 2026 Auto Express summer test.

Comfort

Rather than use the drive-by figure printed on the EU label, Auto Express measure the noise heard inside the car, averaging coastdown readings from 100 km/h across three surfaces from smooth to coarse. The Continental was quietest, with the Falken, Bridgestone and Linglong tied behind it and the Hankook last. Less than a decibel separates the whole winter field, so this is not a test that decides anything.

Noise

Internal noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
67.4 dB Best
67.5 dB +0.10 dB
67.5 dB +0.10 dB
67.5 dB +0.10 dB
67.6 dB +0.20 dB
67.6 dB +0.20 dB
67.6 dB +0.20 dB
67.9 dB +0.50 dB
68 dB +0.60 dB
68.1 dB +0.70 dB
68.2 dB +0.80 dB
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
68.2 dB +0.80 dB
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
68.4 dB +1.00 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale comes from the reference tyre's measurement in the 2026 Auto Express summer test.

Value

Rolling resistance was measured to the industry standard rather than read off the label. The Michelin was clear of everything else, by the largest single margin anywhere in this test, and the Bridgestone was second. At the other end the Linglong was the least economical tyre in the test, and the three cheapest tyres in the field turn out to be the three least economical ones as well, so the low ticket price is partly bought back at the pump.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.4 kg/t Best £0
7.85 kg/t +0.45 kg/t £27
8.2 kg/t +0.80 kg/t £48
8.26 kg/t +0.86 kg/t £51
8.31 kg/t +0.91 kg/t £54
8.34 kg/t +0.94 kg/t £56
8.38 kg/t +0.98 kg/t £58
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
8.43 kg/t +1.03 kg/t £61
8.45 kg/t +1.05 kg/t £63
RefPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
8.78 kg/t +1.38 kg/t £82
8.86 kg/t +1.46 kg/t £87
9.2 kg/t +1.80 kg/t £107
9.52 kg/t +2.12 kg/t £126

The difference between best and worst was 28.6% (2.12 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Linglong Sport Master Winter uses about 87 L (£126) more fuel than the Michelin Alpin 7.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tyres are exact; the scale comes from the reference tyre's measurement in the 2026 Auto Express summer test, and it lines up with the declared EU rolling resistance grade for twelve of the thirteen tyres.

Results

Under a point and a half separates first from seventh, so the top of this field is decided by very small margins and no tyre wins everything. What the spread does show is where each maker has put its effort: the Continental and the Pirelli chase wet performance, the Hankook and the Dunlop chase snow, the Falken has been set up around dry braking and wet handling at the cost of everything cold, and the cheapest tyres save money in the places that matter most. The Minerva at the bottom is the clearest warning of the lot, since two tyres that comfortably outperform it cost the same or less.

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 870

205/55 R16 91H
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Auto Express Test Winner
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 won this test, taking the honours in this size for the third time. It did it by being the best wet tyre in the field by a clear margin while giving away very little anywhere else, and its priorities suit UK winters, where cold and rain are far more common than snow.
Dry98.5%
Wet99.5%
Snow97.2%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance90.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 1144.5 m+1.20 m
Dry HandlingLower is better4th / 1157.53 s+0.23 s
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 1133 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 1187.5 sBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1112.1 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1182.7 km/h-2.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 113.38 m/sec2-0.12 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 1118.97 m+0.27 m
Snow TractionLower is better9th / 116.37 s+0.37 s
Snow HandlingLower is better4th / 1186.87 s+0.87 s
NoiseLower is better1st / 1167.4 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 118.2 kg/t+0.80 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
Price
135.00
2nd

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3

205/55 R16 91H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3
The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 finished second and came very close to the winner. It is a genuinely strong wet tyre with dry pace to match, and only its mid-field snow braking keeps it off the top step.
Dry98.7%
Wet98.9%
Snow97.9%
Comfort99.7%
Rolling Resistance89.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1144 m+0.70 m
Dry HandlingLower is better8th / 1157.88 s+0.58 s
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 1133.99 m+0.99 m
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 1187.5 sBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1112.17 s+0.07 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1185.6 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 113.46 m/sec2-0.04 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1119.26 m+0.56 m
Snow TractionLower is better5th / 116.19 s+0.19 s
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 1186.43 s+0.43 s
NoiseLower is better5th / 1167.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 118.26 kg/t+0.86 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
Price
132.00
3rd

Hankook Winter I cept RS3

205/55 R16 91H
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 took third and is the pick of the field if snow matters most, pairing the best snow braking with solid wet and dry results. Refinement and economy are what hold it back.
Dry98.3%
Wet97.6%
Snow99.7%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance88.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 1144.78 m+1.48 m
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 1157.41 s+0.11 s
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 1133.92 m+0.92 m
Wet HandlingLower is better7th / 1189.19 s+1.69 s
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 1112.46 s+0.36 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1184.2 km/h-1.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 113.43 m/sec2-0.07 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1118.7 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 116.03 s+0.03 s
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 1186.43 s+0.43 s
NoiseLower is better11th / 1168.2 dB+0.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 118.38 kg/t+0.98 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Price
115.00
Joint 4th

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

205/55 R16 91H
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 shared fourth place and is a genuine all-rounder, strong in the snow and the wet with excellent economy. Its dry braking is the one result that stands out for the wrong reason.
Dry97.4%
Wet96.8%
Snow98.1%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance94.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better11th / 1145.72 m+2.42 m
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 1157.3 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 1134.81 m+1.81 m
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 1188.83 s+1.33 s
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1112.37 s+0.27 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1180 km/h-5.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 113.41 m/sec2-0.09 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1118.78 m+0.08 m
Snow TractionLower is better6th / 116.21 s+0.21 s
Snow HandlingLower is better7th / 1187.49 s+1.49 s
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1167.5 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 117.85 kg/t+0.45 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
Price
108.00
Joint 4th

Michelin Alpin 7

205/55 R16 94H XL
Michelin Alpin 7
The Michelin Alpin 7 shared fourth place on a card with no real gaps, and its economy advantage over the rest of the field is the largest single margin anywhere in this test. That makes it a strong choice for high-mileage winter driving.
Dry97.7%
Wet96.7%
Snow99%
Comfort99%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1144.92 m+1.62 m
Dry HandlingLower is better8th / 1157.88 s+0.58 s
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 1134.38 m+1.38 m
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 1188.83 s+1.33 s
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1112.42 s+0.32 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1180.8 km/h-4.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 113.21 m/sec2-0.29 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1118.91 m+0.21 m
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 116.05 s+0.05 s
Snow HandlingLower is better5th / 1186.96 s+0.96 s
NoiseLower is better10th / 1168.1 dB+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 117.4 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/B/71
Price
152.00
6th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

205/55 R16 94V XL
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 took sixth with its priorities in the right places, being at its best in the snow and the deep water. Weak dry handling and mid-field wet braking are what separate it from the top five.
Dry97.4%
Wet97.7%
Snow99.1%
Comfort99.7%
Rolling Resistance87.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 1145.01 m+1.71 m
Dry HandlingLower is better11th / 1158.11 s+0.81 s
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1134.99 m+1.99 m
Wet HandlingLower is better4th / 1188.56 s+1.06 s
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1112.19 s+0.09 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1183.9 km/h-1.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 113.5 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1119.04 m+0.34 m
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 116.06 s+0.06 s
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 1186 sBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better5th / 1167.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 118.45 kg/t+1.05 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
Price
138.00
7th

Falken EUROWINTER HS02

205/55 R16 91H
Falken EUROWINTER HS02
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 finished seventh with a distinctly wet and dry biased result. It is a competent tyre for a mild winter, but it gives away too much on snow to be an obvious first choice.
Dry99.8%
Wet96.5%
Snow94.2%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance88.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 1143.3 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better5th / 1157.59 s+0.29 s
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1134.48 m+1.48 m
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 1188.21 s+0.71 s
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1112.44 s+0.34 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1178.5 km/h-7.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 113.16 m/sec2-0.34 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1119.83 m+1.13 m
Snow TractionLower is better10th / 116.55 s+0.55 s
Snow HandlingLower is better10th / 1188.93 s+2.93 s
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1167.5 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 118.34 kg/t+0.94 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/69
Price
105.00
8th

Dunlop Winter

205/55 R16 91H
Dunlop Winter
The Dunlop Winter took eighth on a mixed card, winning the snow traction test but giving too much away in the wet. It needs to improve where it matters most before it can trouble the mid-field.
Dry97.6%
Wet94.5%
Snow99%
Comfort99.3%
Rolling Resistance89.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 1145.01 m+1.71 m
Dry HandlingLower is better10th / 1157.94 s+0.64 s
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 1135.91 m+2.91 m
Wet HandlingLower is better9th / 1190.77 s+3.27 s
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1112.58 s+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1177.6 km/h-8.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 113.3 m/sec2-0.20 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1118.83 m+0.13 m
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 116 sBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better8th / 1188.02 s+2.02 s
NoiseLower is better8th / 1167.9 dB+0.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 118.31 kg/t+0.91 kg/t
EU Label
C/C/71
Price
119.00
9th

Linglong Sport Master Winter

205/55 R16 94V XL
Linglong Sport Master Winter
The Linglong Sport Master Winter finished ninth, a step back from its showing in this test a year ago. Snow performance is respectable for the money, but the deep-water results and the economy are hard to overlook.
Dry97.7%
Wet93.6%
Snow96.7%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance77.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 1145.1 m+1.80 m
Dry HandlingLower is better6th / 1157.7 s+0.40 s
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1134.99 m+1.99 m
Wet HandlingLower is better8th / 1190.67 s+3.17 s
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1112.71 s+0.61 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1173.3 km/h-12.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 112.79 m/sec2-0.71 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1119.42 m+0.72 m
Snow TractionLower is better7th / 116.31 s+0.31 s
Snow HandlingLower is better6th / 1187.22 s+1.22 s
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1167.5 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 119.52 kg/t+2.12 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
Price
90.00
10th

Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6

205/55 R16 94V XL
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 finished tenth and is priced accordingly. It is a reasonable budget choice if snow is the main concern, but the wet results are a real compromise.
Dry97.5%
Wet93.5%
Snow96.3%
Comfort99.1%
Rolling Resistance80.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1145.29 m+1.99 m
Dry HandlingLower is better6th / 1157.7 s+0.40 s
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 1136.71 m+3.71 m
Wet HandlingLower is better10th / 1190.96 s+3.46 s
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1112.66 s+0.56 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1178.1 km/h-7.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 113.2 m/sec2-0.30 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1119.32 m+0.62 m
Snow TractionLower is better8th / 116.36 s+0.36 s
Snow HandlingLower is better8th / 1188.02 s+2.02 s
NoiseLower is better9th / 1168 dB+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 119.2 kg/t+1.80 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/70
Price
73.00
11th

Minerva Frostrack HP

205/55 R16 91V
Minerva Frostrack HP
The Minerva Frostrack HP finished last, and its strengths sit in exactly the wrong places for a winter tyre. Two tyres that beat it comfortably cost the same or less, so there is no value argument to fall back on.
Dry98.9%
Wet86%
Snow91.8%
Comfort99.7%
Rolling Resistance83.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 1144.32 m+1.02 m
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 1157.3 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 1139.52 m+6.52 m
Wet HandlingLower is better11th / 1195.52 s+8.02 s
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 1113.02 s+0.92 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 1167.2 km/h-18.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 111.84 m/sec2-1.66 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better11th / 1120.04 m+1.34 m
Snow TractionLower is better11th / 116.75 s+0.75 s
Snow HandlingLower is better11th / 1191.98 s+5.98 s
NoiseLower is better5th / 1167.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 118.86 kg/t+1.46 kg/t
EU Label
C/C/70
Price
89.00
Reference Tyre

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

205/55 R16 94V XL
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 was run as a reference to show what an all-season tyre gives up to a dedicated winter tyre. On this evidence it gives up very little in these conditions, which says more about how far all-season tyres have come than about the field it was measured against.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better38.8 m
Dry HandlingLower is better57.82 s
Wet BrakingLower is better31.91 m
Wet HandlingLower is better87.68 s
Wet CircleLower is better12.36 s
Straight AquaHigher is better80.6 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3.19 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better19.6 m
Snow TractionLower is better6.15 s
Snow HandlingLower is better87.67 s
NoiseLower is better68.2 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8.78 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
Price
105.00
Reference Tyre

Continental PremiumContact 7

205/55 R16 91V
Continental PremiumContact 7
The Continental PremiumContact 7 is here as a control, not a contender, and its job is to show what running summer tyres through a cold snap actually costs. In the snow tests it is not remotely close to any winter tyre in the field.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better35.99 m
Dry HandlingLower is better53.95 s
Wet BrakingLower is better27.41 m
Wet HandlingLower is better85.53 s
Wet CircleLower is better11.52 s
Straight AquaHigher is better76.9 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3.31 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better42.21 m
Snow TractionLower is better18.87 s
Snow HandlingLower is better127.79 s
NoiseLower is better68.4 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8.43 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
Price
113.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.