Vredestein Ultrac vs Hifly HP801
Ahead in each discipline
The Vredestein Ultrac and the Hifly HP801 have met in one independent test so far, and the Ultrac finished ahead. The Ultrac was stronger in dry, wet, off road, comfort and value.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ultrac
HP801
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Ultrac
HP801
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Ultrac
HP801
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Ultrac 78% from 24 reviews and the HP801 61% from 11. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Ultrac | Gap | HP801 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Ultrac ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 35.5 | 5.1% | 37.4 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 106.4 | 1.9% | 104.4 |
| Wet Ultrac ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 50.8 | 14.6% | 59.5 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 85.9 | 3.6% | 82.9 |
| Wet Circle s | 20.22 | 4.5% | 21.18 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 86.2 | 1.4% | 87.4 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.74 | 9.2% | 2.51 |
| Off road Ultrac ahead | |||
| Gravel Handling km/h | 60.4 | 1.2% | 59.7 |
| Gravel Traction N | 10,630 | 1.6% | 10,800 |
| Sand Traction N | 10,280 | 4.2% | 9,870 |
| Grass Traction s | 1.72 | 14% | 2 |
| Comfort Ultrac ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 62.9 | 0.6 dB | 63.5 |
| Value Ultrac ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.45 | 18.3% | 9.12 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ultrac | Field | HP801 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | P2 of 10 | P9 of 10 |
Ultrac vs HP801: your questions
Is the Vredestein Ultrac or the Hifly HP801 the better tyre?
The Vredestein Ultrac and the Hifly HP801 have met in one independent test so far, and the Ultrac finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ultrac scores 8.7 and the HP801 6.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ultrac or the HP801?
The Ultrac led 4 of the 5 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ultrac led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the Ultrac and 6.2/10 for the HP801.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ultrac 78% from 24 reviews and the HP801 61% from 11. 83% of Ultrac owners would buy it again, against 50% for the HP801.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Ultrac is made in 65 sizes (15 to 21 inch) and the HP801 in 28 (16 to 22 inch). 11 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Ultrac is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the HP801 C and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The HP801 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2021, the Ultrac in 2020.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Vredestein Ultrac
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Vredestein Ultrac
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac
7-2 in 9 shared tests
vs
Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Vredestein Ultrac
5-4 in 9 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Vredestein Ultrac
0-1 in 2 shared tests
vs
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Vredestein Ultrac
0-1 in 2 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Vredestein Ultrac
4-6 in 10 shared tests
vs
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Vredestein Ultrac
7-3 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.