Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3
The Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 and the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 have met in one independent test so far, and the UltraGrip Ice 3 finished ahead. The UltraGrip Ice 3 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, ice, comfort and value.
Performance profile
13 measurements from the one shared test, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
Winter I cept iZ2 W616
Not ahead on any measurement here
UltraGrip Ice 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Winter I cept iZ2 W616
Not ahead in any category
UltraGrip Ice 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Winter I cept iZ2 W616
UltraGrip Ice 3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 84% from 5 reviews and the UltraGrip Ice 3 79% from 4. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tyres' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tyre that did better.
| Measurement | Winter I cept iZ2 W616 | Gap | UltraGrip Ice 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry UltraGrip Ice 3 ahead | |||
| Dry Braking m | 32.37 | 0.8% | 32.1 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 4 | 25% | 5 |
| Wet UltraGrip Ice 3 ahead | |||
| Wet Braking m | 40.36 | 7% | 37.55 |
| Wet Handling s | 42.5 | 4.5% | 40.6 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 62.4 | 9.8% | 68.5 |
| Snow UltraGrip Ice 3 ahead | |||
| Snow Braking m | 12.73 | 2.4% | 12.43 |
| Snow Traction s | 4.2 | 3.8% | 4.04 |
| Snow Handling s | 81.5 | 2.3% | 79.6 |
| Ice UltraGrip Ice 3 ahead | |||
| Ice Braking m | 15.68 | 18.7% | 12.75 |
| Ice Traction s | 11 | 18.3% | 8.99 |
| Ice Handling s | 69.3 | 4.2% | 66.4 |
| Comfort UltraGrip Ice 3 ahead | |||
| Noise dB | 71.7 | 0.2 dB | 71.5 |
| Value UltraGrip Ice 3 ahead | |||
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.4 | 2.8% | 5.25 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2024
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Winter I cept iZ2 W616 | Field | UltraGrip Ice 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | P5 of 8 | P1 of 8 |
Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs UltraGrip Ice 3: your questions
Is the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 or the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 the better tyre?
The Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 and the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 have met in one independent test so far, and the UltraGrip Ice 3 finished ahead. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 scores 5.7 and the UltraGrip Ice 3 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 or the UltraGrip Ice 3?
The UltraGrip Ice 3 led 3 of the 3 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The UltraGrip Ice 3 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The UltraGrip Ice 3 led 3 of the 3 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9.2/10 for the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 and 9.5/10 for the UltraGrip Ice 3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 84% from 5 reviews and the UltraGrip Ice 3 79% from 4.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Winter I cept iZ2 W616 is made in 50 sizes (13 to 19 inch) and the UltraGrip Ice 3 in 92 (15 to 22 inch). 21 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 is graded E for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the UltraGrip Ice 3 E and B.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Pirelli Ice Friction
1-1 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
7-1 in 8 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 vs Michelin X Ice Snow
0-3 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Michelin X Ice North 4
2-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
2-0 in 4 shared tests
Every Hankook vs Goodyear test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tyres →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 Review the UltraGrip Ice 3
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.