Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 16
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 92% · 9
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finished ahead 3 times and the Proxes Sport 2 not once. The Potenza Sport Evo stopped 4.8% shorter in the wet; the Proxes Sport 2 had 2.6% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Buy the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo. It finished ahead in all three shared tests, brakes shorter in every dry and wet measurement and lasts 35 percent longer, which makes it cheaper per 1000km too. The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is worth considering only for its lower noise, lower rolling resistance and the steering feel Auto Bild's judges preferred.
Where the Potenza Sport Evo is stronger
- Finished ahead in all three shared tests, 2nd of 9 against 6th in the SUV test
- Shorter braking in all three dry and all three wet measurements
- 35 percent longer tread life, 51,860km against 38,420km at Auto Bild
Where the Proxes Sport 2 is stronger
- Quieter in both noise measurements and lower rolling resistance in both
- Better straight aquaplaning in both measurements
- Higher subjective dry handling score, 8.7 points against 6.7 at Auto Bild
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Potenza Sport Evo vs Proxes Sport 2 at a glance
| Category | Potenza Sport Evo | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 3 | 0 | |
| Dry6 measurements | 4 | The Potenza Sport Evo stopped 1.6% shorter in the dry (3 tests) | 2 |
| Wet12 measurements | 9 | The Potenza Sport Evo stopped 4.8% shorter in the wet (3 tests) | 3 |
| Off road4 measurements | 3 | 1 | |
| Comfort3 measurements | 1 | The Proxes Sport 2 was 2 dB quieter (2 tests) | 2 |
| Value4 measurements | 2 | Level between the two. | 2 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The Potenza Sport Evo by 0.4 | 9.1/10 |
| Owner rating16 and 9 reviews | 85% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 7 points | 92% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 86% | The Proxes Sport 2 by 14 points | 100% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | +35.8% | The Potenza Sport Evo was dearer in 2 of 2 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 115 | 88 sizes made in both | 113 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Potenza Sport Evo | Field | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | P2 of 9 | P6 of 9 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | P11 of 20 | P17 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P11 of 50 | P16 of 50 |
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Potenza Sport Evo
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 9 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Potenza Sport Evo
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Potenza Sport Evo
Not ahead in any category
Proxes Sport 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Potenza Sport Evo | Gap | Proxes Sport 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.03 | 1.6% | 34.6 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 103.2 | 0.4% | 102.8 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 29.9% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 41.53 | 4.8% | 43.67 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 85.65 | 1.8% | 84.15 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 33.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 17.32 | 3.8% | 18 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 89.15 | 3.6% | 92.4 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2.97 | 2.9% | 3.04 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 64.2 | 2.2% | 62.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 10,199 | 1.8% | 10,387 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 8,897 | 4.8% | 8,487 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2,879 | 14.5% | 2,514 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 73.1 | 2 dB | 71.15 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 51,860 | 35% | 38,420 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 8.66 | 2.6% | 8.43 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 1,533 | 11.6% | 1,734 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport Evo scores 9.5 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
| Potenza Sport Evo | Category | Proxes Sport 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98 | Dry | 92 | ||
| 97 | Wet | 81 | ||
| 11 | Comfort | 48 | ||
| 20 | Value | 14 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Potenza Sport Evo | Category | Proxes Sport 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | Dry Grip | 9.4 | ||
| 8.6 | Wet Grip | 9.3 | ||
| 8.4 | Road Feedback | 9 | ||
| 9.2 | Handling | 9.4 | ||
| 7.8 | Wear | 8.8 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 8.5 | ||
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
- 85%from 16 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 71,803 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo delivers outstanding dry grip and exceptionally strong wet traction, with very sharp turn-in and confident, stable handling that suits fast road use and even track days. Many also feel wear and track durability are improved versus the older Potenza Sport, and value-for-money is frequently praised against Michelin/Continental rivals. The main recurring drawback is higher road noise and a firmer, stiff-sidewall ride, which can reduce refinement on quieter cars.
- Excellent dry grip
- Very strong wet grip and confidence in rain/cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and quick turn-in
- Stable, predictable handling with strong braking/traction
- Noticeably higher road noise/roar
- Firm ride and stiff sidewalls (reduced comfort/refinement for some)
Summarised by AI from 13 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 16 Potenza Sport Evo reviewsBefore switching to the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo (in size 205/45/17), I had the Yokohama Advan Neova RS (in size 205/55/17). The difference is night and day—in favor of the Bridgestones. Their grip and user-friendliness are on an entirely different level; they are in a different league compared to the unacceptable Yokohama Advan Neova RS, whose only real advantage was minimal wear.
The Bridgestones seem much more prone to wear, but that’s a fair trade-off given their excellent performance—after all, you can’t have everything. I can’t comment on their performance in the rain, as I haven’t had the chance to drive in such conditions yet.
To wrap up, they are quiet and feature a very solid sidewall—though perhaps not quite as good as those found on older Bridgestone models.
I recommend them without hesitation!
Toyo Proxes Sport 2
- 92%from 9 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 88,100 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 delivers standout performance for the price, with consistently strong dry and wet grip, high confidence at speed, and sharp, predictable handling/steering response. Many comparisons against premium competitors (Michelin/Goodyear/Continental/Bridgestone) describe the Toyo as matching or exceeding them in real-world traction and stability while offering excellent value. Wear/longevity feedback is generally very positive where reported, with several users noting robust tread life. A smaller number of drivers mention trade-offs such as limited rim-protection and a sport-tyre firmness (and occasional noise) depending on vehicle setup.
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Sharp handling, steering response, and stability at speed
- Predictable behavior under hard braking/cornering
Summarised by AI from 9 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 9 Proxes Sport 2 reviewsI have had these tyres on my Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Quattro for a year and a half now and coming from an avid PS4S user I must say I'm shocked at how good these are for the money! They were about £70 per corner cheaper than the PS4S' for the TT in 255/35/19 so initially I was sceptical but I am amazing at the handling, dry AND wet grip they provide and the longevity of the tyres! I have covered a good mix of country roads, motorways and long trips across Europe in the year and a half I have had these on and they have never missed a beat! I'm so confident in the wet, even when driving very "spiritedly"! Granted they aren't as comfortable as a BluEarth GT AE51 for example but the car is lowered on coil overs so its not all the tyres fault. 10/10 would defiantly purchase again and recommend to others.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 115 sizes of the Potenza Sport Evo and 113 of the Proxes Sport 2, 88 of them made in both.
| Category | Potenza Sport Evo | Proxes Sport 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 115 sizes, 16 to 22 inch | 113 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 88 sizes 205/45 R17205/50 R17215/45 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17235/45 R17245/40 R17245/45 R17215/45 R18and 76 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A99%B1% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C67%D30%B3% | C72%D28% |
| EU label noise | 71-73 dB B100% | 71-72 dB B80%A20% |
| On the market since | 2025 | - |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Potenza Sport (2021) | - |
| Awards | Winner: Supersports Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2026/27) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Potenza Sport Evo was the dearer tyre in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 35.8% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Previous generation: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2 (5 shared tests)
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Three shared tests, all from 2026, and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finished ahead in all three: 2nd of 9 against the Toyo Proxes Sport 2's 6th in Auto Bild Allrad's SUV test, 11th of 20 against 17th in Auto Bild's main summer test and 11th of 50 against 16th in the braking super test.
Braking is the reason. The Bridgestone stopped shorter in the dry in all three measurements, 33.1m against 34.6m in the SUV test, and shorter in the wet in all three, 52.3m against 55.4m, 5.6 percent. It also won both wet handling comparisons and both wet circle runs.
Tread life is the other big number. Auto Bild measured 51,860km against 38,420km, 35 percent more, with less abrasion, 1533g against 1734g, which made the Bridgestone the cheaper tyre per 1000km despite the premium badge.
The Toyo answers on refinement and efficiency: quieter in both noise measurements, lower rolling resistance in both, and better straight aquaplaning in both.
Conclusion
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo is the better tyre on all three shared tests, and the pattern is consistent. It was 2nd of 9 in Auto Bild Allrad's 2026 SUV test with the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 6th, 11th of 20 against 17th in Auto Bild's main 2026 summer test and 11th of 50 against 16th in the 2026 braking super test. It braked shorter in the dry in all three measurements, 33.1m against 34.6m in the SUV test, and shorter in the wet in all three, 52.3m against 55.4m, 5.6 percent, and it won both wet handling comparisons and both wet circle runs, 19.9s against 20.7s. Tread life is the widest single gap: 51,860km against 38,420km at Auto Bild, 35 percent more, with 1533g of abrasion against 1734g, and it worked out cheaper per 1000km as a result. Auto Bild's panel also rated it higher for subjective wet handling, 8 points against 6, and for comfort, 8 against 7.3. Owners score it 9.50 against 8.20.
The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is the quieter and more efficient tyre. It was quieter in both noise measurements, rolled with less resistance in both, and it resisted straight aquaplaning better in both measurements. Auto Bild's judges also preferred its steering on dry roads, scoring subjective dry handling 8.7 points against 6.7, a substantial margin, and it pulled harder on gravel in the SUV test.
That subjective dry handling result is the interesting tension here: the judges liked how the Toyo felt on a dry road, but the Bridgestone stopped shorter in every dry braking measurement and finished ahead in every test. Unless steering feel and low noise are what you buy on, the Bridgestone is the stronger and the cheaper-to-run tyre.
Potenza Sport Evo vs Proxes Sport 2: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo or the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo finished ahead 3 times and the Proxes Sport 2 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport Evo scores 9.5 and the Proxes Sport 2 9.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Potenza Sport Evo or the Proxes Sport 2?
The Potenza Sport Evo led 9 of the 12 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.8% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Potenza Sport Evo led 4 of the 6 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.6% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Proxes Sport 2 had 2.6% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the Potenza Sport Evo and 8.8/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Proxes Sport 2 was 2 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Potenza Sport Evo and 8.5/10 for the Proxes Sport 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the Proxes Sport 2 92% from 9. 86% of Potenza Sport Evo owners would buy it again, against 100% for the Proxes Sport 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Potenza Sport Evo was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 35.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Potenza Sport Evo is made in 115 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the Proxes Sport 2 in 113 (17 to 22 inch). 88 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Potenza Sport Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Proxes Sport 2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
4-1 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Continental SportContact 7
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
1-1 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Linglong Sport Master
3-1 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion