Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
Expect the Potenza Sport to dominate dry and wet handling/braking metrics and aquaplaning resistance, often feeling the most agile and connected. Conversely, the Hankook frequently counters with lower rolling resistance, quieter road manners, a softer ride, and a friendlier price tag-attributes that matter on the daily commute and at the pump.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been eleven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport | seven | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 | three | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is better than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading dry and wet handling with sharp steering and feedback
- Consistently shorter braking on dry (wins 8/9) and strong wet stops
- Superior aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) across most tests
- Engaging, sporty character with top lap times when warm
- Low rolling resistance (wins 9/9) for better fuel economy
- Quieter and more comfortable ride in most tests
- Lower purchase price and stronger value per km
- Competitive wet braking in several tests with balanced, predictable behavior
Dry Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during eight dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 1.66% less distance than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 1.66% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during four dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 0.94% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 2.05% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Fun
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one subj. fun tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 26.32% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Subj. Fun: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Subj. Fun winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 stopped the vehicle in 0.03% less distance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 stopped the vehicle in 6.35% less distance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Worn
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one wet braking - worn tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport stopped the vehicle in 6.68% less distance than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Wet Braking - Worn: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Braking - Worn winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during three wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 2.35% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 2.52% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport scored 2.56% more points than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during four wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was 3.4% faster around a wet circle than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during eight straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport floated at a 1.85% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during seven curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport slipped out at a 22.16% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 scored 2.91% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 scored 20% more points than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Subj. Noise: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during five noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 measured 1.52% quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Noise: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during one noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 measured 0.28% quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Noise: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is predicted to cover 11.93% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Wear: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during one value tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 proved to have a 30.24% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Value: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during seven price tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 cost 16.87% less than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Price: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 was better during nine rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had a 9.93% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Bridgestone Potenza Sport emitted 25.46% less particle wear matter than the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3.
Best In Abrasion: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Driver Reviews
Across 115 reviews, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport is praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, strong braking, and confidence-inspiring handling, often rivaling or beating PS4/PS4S and PZ4. Many note it performs best when warmed and can be superb for spirited road use, with some citing good value. The most common drawbacks are rapid tread wear, higher noise and a firm ride, noticeable grip drop when cold, and poor durability on track abuse; a few also report slightly higher fuel consumption. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused drivers, with caveats on longevity and comfort.
Based on 120 reviews with an average rating of 80%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 highly, praising its excellent wet braking and very solid dry grip alongside a quiet, comfortable ride and strong value for money. Many note predictable, confidence-inspiring behavior and, for a good number of users, respectable tread life. The main drawback is a soft sidewall feel that limits steering precision and sporty feedback, so it suits grand-touring comfort more than hardcore performance. A minority report faster wear on certain fitments (notably some EV/OEM/runflat applications).
Based on 66 reviews with an average rating of 76%
First thing you notice with these tyres is just how much they improve the ride. The car had stock Dunlop Sport Maxx TT tyres and whilst these gave a sharper steering feel you felt every little ripple in the road. The Hankooks certainly smoothed things out, with only a small trade off in steering feel. Next is the grip. In both wet and dry I've been known to do some pretty stupid things, but I've yet to trigger the ABS or lose grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Ventus S1 evo 3 is the smarter all-rounder for everyday use. It's consistently quieter, more comfortable, and markedly more efficient (regularly 10-16% lower rolling resistance), with strong wet braking showings in several tests and a clear price advantage. For drivers prioritising refinement, fuel economy, and cost per kilometre without sacrificing competent performance, Hankook delivers excellent value.
Key Differences
- Handling focus: Bridgestone feels sharper and more agile; Hankook skews comfort/predictability.
- Braking trend: Potenza Sport generally shorter dry stops; wet braking swings but often favors Bridgestone when warm.
- Aquaplaning: Bridgestone leads both straight and curved resistance in the majority of tests.
- Efficiency: Hankook regularly posts 10-16% lower rolling resistance, aiding fuel economy.
- Noise/comfort: Hankook is typically quieter and more compliant; Bridgestone can run firmer and louder.
- Cost/value: Hankook is usually cheaper to buy and run; Bridgestone often carries a premium and higher energy use.
Overall Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.