Name: 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
Creator: Tyre Reviews
Published: 2022-03-21

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking: 100 → 0 km/h

The 2022 Autobild Sportscars summer tyre test has tested eleven 225/45 R18 sizes using a BMW 3 Series, but has also tested four of the SAME sets in a staggered 225/45 R18 front and 255/4 R18 rear size to compare the two different options.

First up, the main test. Sadly the test was missing Goodyear and Pirelli, and interestingly the testers found the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 not only to be the best, but also to have the sportiest handling, something we're don't see often.

Even more surprising was that the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ finished joint first, beating every tyre in the wet handling test and ending up with enough points to match the Pilot Sport 4.

It was the test of ties, with the Falken FK510 and Toyo Proxes Sport A finishing joint third and the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 finishing joint fifth.

Square vs Staggered Setup

The most interesting part of the test was the square vs staggered setup. Unfortunately the Tyre Reviews database can't list both results, just the square, so we'll have to explain the differences below referencing the square data we have already.

The tyres tested in both square and staggered were the Michelin Pilot Sport 4, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+, Falken FK510 and Nexen N'Fera Sport.

In the dry, the staggered setup with the wider rear tyre stopped 0.1 meters worse for the Falken and 0.2m behind for Michelin and Vredestein which is certainly counter intuitive, but the Nexen was 0.3 meters better with the wider rear tyre.

Dry handling made no more sense with the Michelin finishing 0.8 km/h faster with the wider rear tyre, 1.3 km/h faster for the Vredestein, 1.5 km/h faster for the Nexen, but 1.3 km/h slower for the Falken.

Wet braking had the Michelin stopping the BMW 0.5 meters shorter with the wider rear, 1.3 meters shorter for Nexen but exactly the same for Vredestein and 0.5 longer for the Falken!

Finally, every set of tyres was significantly slower in the wet with the wider rear tyre.

What can we conclude regarding square vs staggered tyres? The data shows that there's not a huge amount of difference with the extra 20 mm of rear tyre width, and whether you get better or worse performance varies between what test is being tested, and the tyre brand used!

There's more information in the full Auto Bild test, so we suggest you check that out if you're interested in further information.

Below is all the data from the 225/45 R18 square test.

Dry

Bridgestone, Hankook and Toyo had an impressive lead in dry braking.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Potenza Sport	36 m	Best	0 km/h
2Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	36.1 m	+0.10 m	7 km/h
2Toyo Proxes Sport A	36.1 m	+0.10 m	7 km/h
4Continental Premium Contact 6	36.7 m	+0.70 m	18 km/h
5Falken Azenis FK510	37 m	+1.00 m	21 km/h
6Michelin Pilot Sport 4	37.1 m	+1.10 m	22 km/h
7Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	37.4 m	+1.40 m	25 km/h
8Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	37.5 m	+1.50 m	26 km/h
9Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	37.7 m	+1.70 m	28 km/h
9GT Radial SportActive 2	37.7 m	+1.70 m	28 km/h
11Fulda SportControl 2	37.8 m	+1.80 m	28 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5% (1.8 m ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Fulda SportControl 2 would still be travelling at 28 km/h when the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Michelin aced the dry handling test with the quickest lap time and the sportiest handling.

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Sport 4	104.1 km/h	Best
2Toyo Proxes Sport A	104 km/h	-0.10 km/h
3Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	103.5 km/h	-0.60 km/h
4Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	103.2 km/h	-0.90 km/h
5Falken Azenis FK510	102.9 km/h	-1.20 km/h
6Continental Premium Contact 6	102.7 km/h	-1.40 km/h
7Bridgestone Potenza Sport	102.2 km/h	-1.90 km/h
8Fulda SportControl 2	102.1 km/h	-2.00 km/h
9Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	101 km/h	-3.10 km/h
10GT Radial SportActive 2	99.2 km/h	-4.90 km/h
11Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	99 km/h	-5.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.9% (5.1 Km/H).

Wet

Bridgestone again led the way in wet braking.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Potenza Sport	45.7 m	Best	0 km/h
2Michelin Pilot Sport 4	47.6 m	+1.90 m	26 km/h
3Falken Azenis FK510	47.9 m	+2.20 m	28 km/h
4Toyo Proxes Sport A	48.8 m	+3.10 m	33 km/h
5Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	49.5 m	+3.80 m	36 km/h
5Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	49.5 m	+3.80 m	36 km/h
7Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	50.6 m	+4.90 m	40 km/h
8Fulda SportControl 2	52.4 m	+6.70 m	46 km/h
9Continental Premium Contact 6	52.5 m	+6.80 m	47 km/h
10GT Radial SportActive 2	57 m	+11.30 m	58 km/h
11Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	65.6 m	+19.90 m	72 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 43.5% (19.9 m ≈ 4.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Tomket Sport 3 Series 3 would still be travelling at 72 km/h when the Bridgestone Potenza Sport had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

But couldn't quite beat Vredestein for the top place in wet handling.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	88.9 km/h	Best
2Bridgestone Potenza Sport	88.8 km/h	-0.10 km/h
3Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	87.6 km/h	-1.30 km/h
4Toyo Proxes Sport A	87.5 km/h	-1.40 km/h
5Michelin Pilot Sport 4	86.9 km/h	-2.00 km/h
6Falken Azenis FK510	86.4 km/h	-2.50 km/h
7Continental Premium Contact 6	85.8 km/h	-3.10 km/h
8Fulda SportControl 2	85.1 km/h	-3.80 km/h
9Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	82.9 km/h	-6.00 km/h
10GT Radial SportActive 2	78.2 km/h	-10.70 km/h
11Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	75.2 km/h	-13.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (13.7 Km/H).

GT Radial and Toyo led the way in the aquaplaning testing.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Toyo Proxes Sport A	99.4 km/h	Best
2GT Radial SportActive 2	98.8 km/h	-0.60 km/h
3Michelin Pilot Sport 4	98.2 km/h	-1.20 km/h
4Falken Azenis FK510	98 km/h	-1.40 km/h
5Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	97.9 km/h	-1.50 km/h
6Fulda SportControl 2	97 km/h	-2.40 km/h
7Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	96.4 km/h	-3.00 km/h
8Bridgestone Potenza Sport	95.7 km/h	-3.70 km/h
9Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	95.6 km/h	-3.80 km/h
10Continental Premium Contact 6	95 km/h	-4.40 km/h
11Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	94.6 km/h	-4.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.8% (4.8 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1GT Radial SportActive 2	3.69 m/sec2	Best
2Fulda SportControl 2	3.6 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
2Toyo Proxes Sport A	3.6 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
4Falken Azenis FK510	3.54 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2
5Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	3.34 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
6Michelin Pilot Sport 4	3.27 m/sec2	-0.42 m/sec2
7Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	3.18 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2
8Bridgestone Potenza Sport	3.06 m/sec2	-0.63 m/sec2
9Continental Premium Contact 6	2.91 m/sec2	-0.78 m/sec2
10Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	2.85 m/sec2	-0.84 m/sec2
11Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	2.82 m/sec2	-0.87 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 23.6% (0.87 m/sec2).

Environment

The budget Tomket had the lowest external noise on test.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	70.8 dB	Best
2Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	72.2 dB	+1.40 dB
3GT Radial SportActive 2	72.3 dB	+1.50 dB
4Michelin Pilot Sport 4	72.8 dB	+2.00 dB
4Fulda SportControl 2	72.8 dB	+2.00 dB
6Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	72.9 dB	+2.10 dB
7Falken Azenis FK510	73.2 dB	+2.40 dB
8Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	73.3 dB	+2.50 dB
9Toyo Proxes Sport A	73.5 dB	+2.70 dB
10Continental Premium Contact 6	74.1 dB	+3.30 dB
10Bridgestone Potenza Sport	74.1 dB	+3.30 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3.3 dB).

And the lowest rolling resistance.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	8.18 kg/t	Best	£0
2Michelin Pilot Sport 4	8.42 kg/t	+0.24 kg/t	£13
3GT Radial SportActive 2	8.62 kg/t	+0.44 kg/t	£24
4Continental Premium Contact 6	8.71 kg/t	+0.53 kg/t	£29
5Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	8.76 kg/t	+0.58 kg/t	£31
6Fulda SportControl 2	8.77 kg/t	+0.59 kg/t	£32
7Falken Azenis FK510	9.01 kg/t	+0.83 kg/t	£45
8Toyo Proxes Sport A	9.47 kg/t	+1.29 kg/t	£70
9Bridgestone Potenza Sport	9.7 kg/t	+1.52 kg/t	£82
10Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	9.85 kg/t	+1.67 kg/t	£90
11Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	10 kg/t	+1.82 kg/t	£98

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (1.82 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ uses about 68 L (£98) more fuel than the Tomket Sport 3 Series 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

And the lowest price.

Results

Dry98.5%

Wet95.8%

Comfort97.3%

Rolling Resistance97.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 11	37.1 m	+1.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 11	104.1 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 11	47.6 m	+1.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 11	86.9 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 11	12.01 s	+0.54 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 11	98.2 km/h	-1.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 11	3.27 m/sec2	-0.42 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 11	72.8 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 11	8.42 kg/t	+0.24 kg/t

Price: 660.00

Dry97.6%

Wet96%

Comfort96.6%

Rolling Resistance81.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 11	37.5 m	+1.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 11	103.2 km/h	-0.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	49.5 m	+3.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 11	88.9 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 11	11.82 s	+0.35 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 11	97.9 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 11	3.34 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 11	73.3 dB	+2.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	11^th / 11	10 kg/t	+1.82 kg/t

Price: 485.00

Dry98.1%

Wet96.4%

Comfort96.7%

Rolling Resistance90.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	37 m	+1.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 11	102.9 km/h	-1.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 11	47.9 m	+2.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 11	86.4 km/h	-2.50 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 11	11.95 s	+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 11	98 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 11	3.54 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 11	73.2 dB	+2.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 11	9.01 kg/t	+0.83 kg/t

Price: 570.00

Dry99.8%

Wet97.1%

Comfort96.3%

Rolling Resistance86.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 11	36.1 m	+0.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 11	104 km/h	-0.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 11	48.8 m	+3.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 11	87.5 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 11	11.73 s	+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 11	99.4 km/h	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 11	3.6 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 11	73.5 dB	+2.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 11	9.47 kg/t	+1.29 kg/t

Price: 495.00

Dry99.1%

Wet97.7%

Comfort95.6%

Rolling Resistance84.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 11	36 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 11	102.2 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 11	45.7 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 11	88.8 km/h	-0.10 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 11	11.47 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 11	95.7 km/h	-3.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 11	3.06 m/sec2	-0.63 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 11	74.1 dB	+3.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 11	9.7 kg/t	+1.52 kg/t

Price: 560.00

Dry99.6%

Wet94.1%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance93.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 11	36.1 m	+0.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 11	103.5 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	49.5 m	+3.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 11	87.6 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 11	11.76 s	+0.29 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 11	95.6 km/h	-3.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10^th / 11	2.85 m/sec2	-0.84 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 11	72.2 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 11	8.76 kg/t	+0.58 kg/t

Price: 520.00

Dry98.4%

Wet91.4%

Comfort95.6%

Rolling Resistance93.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 11	36.7 m	+0.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 11	102.7 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 11	52.5 m	+6.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 11	85.8 km/h	-3.10 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	9^th / 11	12.2 s	+0.73 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 11	95 km/h	-4.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 11	2.91 m/sec2	-0.78 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 11	74.1 dB	+3.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 11	8.71 kg/t	+0.53 kg/t

Price: 590.00

Dry96.7%

Wet94.1%

Comfort97.3%

Rolling Resistance93.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	11^th / 11	37.8 m	+1.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 11	102.1 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 11	52.4 m	+6.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 11	85.1 km/h	-3.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	5^th / 11	11.9 s	+0.43 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 11	97 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 11	3.6 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 11	72.8 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 11	8.77 kg/t	+0.59 kg/t

Price: 495.00

Dry96.6%

Wet92.7%

Comfort97.1%

Rolling Resistance83.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 11	37.4 m	+1.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 11	101 km/h	-3.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 11	50.6 m	+4.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 11	82.9 km/h	-6.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 11	12.02 s	+0.55 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 11	96.4 km/h	-3.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 11	3.18 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 11	72.9 dB	+2.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 11	9.85 kg/t	+1.67 kg/t

Price: 410.00

Dry95.4%

Wet89.8%

Comfort97.9%

Rolling Resistance94.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 11	37.7 m	+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 11	99.2 km/h	-4.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 11	57 m	+11.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 11	78.2 km/h	-10.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	10^th / 11	12.34 s	+0.87 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 11	98.8 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 11	3.69 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 11	72.3 dB	+1.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 11	8.62 kg/t	+0.44 kg/t

Price: 490.00

Dry95.3%

Wet82.3%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 11	37.7 m	+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11^th / 11	99 km/h	-5.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 11	65.6 m	+19.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	11^th / 11	75.2 km/h	-13.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	11^th / 11	12.78 s	+1.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	11^th / 11	94.6 km/h	-4.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	11^th / 11	2.82 m/sec2	-0.87 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 11	70.8 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 11	8.18 kg/t	Best in this discipline

Price: 335.00

Discussion

6 comments

Martini Qualini Apr 14, 2022 archived

Sadly missing weight :( Most important factor for me.

#7963
1. TyreReviews Martini Qualini Apr 14, 2022 archived
  
  Out of interest, why? We have weights listed on our UHP test.
  
  #7964
Steve Wellen Mar 26, 2022 archived

The square vs staggered setup results leaves my thinking that tyre technology is still a literal black art and no one can produce consistent results. It's like getting a TV with resolution between 1820and1990 x 1000and1160. It must make your job 20% frustrating and 80% fascinating.

#7920
1. TyreReviews Steve Wellen Mar 26, 2022 archived
  
  The differences between the sizes was definitely too small to be meaningful in this test, it would have more affected balance rather than grip.
  
  #7921
Lukica Stipetić Mar 21, 2022 archived

Unfortunately, all the old models except Vredestsein and Bridgestone ... and yes, there is no GY!

#7915
1. TyreReviews Lukica Stipetić Mar 22, 2022 archived
  
  This will have been tested back in September / October last year, hence last years models. It's difficult to do summer tests in the same year for publication around this time.
  
  #7916

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Square vs Staggered Setup

Dry

Wet

Environment

Results

Cross-check this test