Falken Azenis FK510
WatchThe Falken Azenis FK510 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
Videos
The ULTIMATE tyre test! These are the best UHP tires you can buy for your car!
In Depth Tyre Comparisons
All Tests
View Test ResultsAlternative Tyres
Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis FK510
Ask a questionPlease can you tell me if it is safe to have an FK453 on nearside rear and FK510 on offside rear, on a Ford Mondeo Estate?
Putting these Falkens on a 2007 911, are these tire able to be rotated from right to left?
Are Falken tyres (FK510) suitable for a Porsche Boxster S?
Are falken azenis fk510 tyres all season tyres?
Hi, I have Mazda 6 2.5 2008. I ride mostly 90% city + 10% curved countryside roads (I like enjoy them). The best solution is buy Michelin Pilot Sport 4, I know, but it is 50-60% more expensive then FK510. I decide between FK510 and Goodyear F1 Asym 5. Question is - Should I pay 15 % more for Goodyear or there isn't too much better behavior for that higher price?
I have a suv 4x4 with Bridgestone Dueler on front and rear axles. The rears have worn to 3.4mm in 15000 miles the fronts are on 5mm. I tow a caravan. Would Falken FK510 tyres be any better?
Looking to put falken fk510 on my vauxhall gtc with 19" rims, new pair onto go on the front only. However, load rating for the falkens is 99, car already has 95 load tyres on the back which will stay on, and 95 is the norm for this vehicle. Will there be any difference with the 99 load on the front? Thanks
Is the Falken f510 suitable for rear drive wheels of a mercedes e250cdi amg convertable
Are FALKEN AZENIS FR510 18” run flats
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Review Summary
Based on 138 user reviews
Drivers largely praise the Falken Azenis FK510 for excellent wet grip, strong dry traction, and a notably comfortable, quiet ride (especially as a replacement for run-flats), all at a compelling price. Many report stable, confidence-inspiring handling and good aquaplaning resistance. The most consistent drawbacks are faster-than-expected wear and softer sidewalls that can reduce steering precision; several users also note grip dropping off as the tyre wears or in colder conditions. Overall sentiment is solidly positive for a value-focused UHP tyre.
Strengths
- Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Strong dry grip
- Comfort and reduced noise (especially vs run-flats)
- Stable
- Confidence-inspiring handling
- Good value for money
Areas for Improvement
- Fast tread wear/short lifespan
- Soft sidewalls and less precise steering
- Grip declines as the tyre wears or in colder temps
Top 3 Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews
The dry grip is good but in the wet the grip is super solid, in difficult rainy conditions i really felt safe with it.
We have another car with the Goodyear oem original mercedes ones ( c200 2021) and the driving experience is the same although the GY ones are more expensive
Maybe the only negative thing is that I don't think they're helping the mileage since they're very grippy.
Highly recommened
Got these tires because of the good pricing with good reviews and it did not disappoint. The dry grip and handling is really good, can really feel the car sticking to the roads especially when taking corners at higher speeds. However, for wet weather grip, it is just slightly less grippy, but still does well with the handling.
Road feedback wise is average but better than my previous tires. Did around 50k km with the tires and was overall really satisfied. After a year of usage then I started to feel the grip losing out a little.
Would recommend the FK510 over FK520 as the grip feels better and I feel more confident taking corners on the FK510. Additional bonus is that it is one of the more affordable set of good tires.
Latest Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews
So I got thinking. And I decided that the culprit was the sidewall that was too firm. I wanted to have a flex in the sidewall or in the tread lugs when I was doing turn around a corner or in roundabouts, the front tyres would flex, and would then push the car in the opposite direction. So I found from reviews that the Hankook and Falken UUHP tyres had softer sidewalls which, in opinion of some people, made them similar to the touring tyres.
With that thought, when the PS4 wore out, I got Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3. I gave up on my snobbery against "lesser-branded" tyres. Indeed, the Hankook had softer sidewalls, and handling had that pliable feel that I was looking for. The tyre performed 90% of the PS4 while costing 2/3 of it. I was pleasantly surprised with the Hankook tyre. It lasted 32k km versus 30k km for PS4. I thought I would be getting it again.
When the Hankooks wore out, I could not get it in my favourite online store. But it was OK with me, as I wanted to try the other hero of the crowd: the Falken Azenis. I had a choice between the FK510 and FK520 model. First, I set my eyes on FK520, as this was a newer model (therefore, it was better ?). However, further thinking threw an idea at me that the older model FK510 could have a thicker sidewall unlike the more modern FK520 that apparently was made with the stronger but thinner sidewall materials. My Hankook was of the same ilk, and I did not quite like it. It was too sensitive to air pressure. It depended on airpressure for the ride not on the stiffness of the rubber in the sidewall. The FK510 seemed to be of the older generation that I liked. So... FK510 was much cheaper in my favourite store (which indicated it was several years old). It was half price of PS4. The final convincing fact came from the review of the Singaporean gentleman in here, who said that FK510 had a better dry grip than FK520, thus he recommended it. So, I was set on FK510.
I got the tyres, and I was happy I got them. I noticed straight away that it had that "pliable" feeling in handling that I was looking for. Now, the road provided a lot of feedback to me through the steering wheel. (I think it also has to do because of a lot of sipes in the lugs as is compared to the larger solid lugs in FK520). The feeling was better than that in the previous Hankooks. The tyres were 3 years old, but that was OK, as I did not feel shortchanged in terms of the grip. The tyres were made in Japan. Also, the tyre design had a pronounced rim protector that I liked a lot. So, it turned out the best tyre for me so far on this car.
BUT TIRES MADE IN JAPAN
THE SAME TIRE MANUFACTURED IN TURKEY IS GARBAGE!
From 15-20000 km they were performing really good, dry and wet conditions. At around 20k I had swapped front and back ones as wear was pretty high at the front, and from 20-25k wet grip was fading. I had also experienced balancing issues (around 120+ km a mild rattling of the steering wheel).
I would say that for the first 20k it's a really high performance tire, as grip was amasing, dry and wet, but as it wears out it starts becoming more and more slippery. At the end of their life they were kind of dangerous in the wet, and 35k kilometers (~28k miles) it's not that high for the price of 18 inch tires (rears were at the same level as the legal limit indicators). I have gone to something completely different (higher profile 17 inches to try how my hydractive suspension behaves) so I cannot give a direct comparison, obviously the new tires are grippier than the almost slick falkens :p
Dry grip is good. Very close to the RE004. Definitely more than adequate for daily driving. Even when cornering at speed, the tyres grip well and don’t squeal much. Wet grip is slightly better than the RE004. The RE004 felt a bit nervous when driving quickly on wet roads. But on the FK510, there is less aquaplaning and the car feels more planted.
Feel wise, the RE004 is noticeably stiffer than the FK510. As a result, the FK510 just doesn’t feel as sharp or darty through corners. A nice handling tyre but just not sharp enough to compete with the best in this mid-range UHP segment. However the FK510 is more comfortable and absorbs bumps better.
Overall, a good UHP tyre for daily driving but definitely not the best in the segment in terms of handling. I wouldn’t buy these again as I prioritise driving enjoyment over all else but for someone who wants a jack-of-all-trades tyre for their daily driver. The FK510 is a good choice.
