Menu

Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.7
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
88%
Road Feedback
82%
Handling
81%
Wear
71%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
82%
150 Reviews
81% Average
1,359,238 miles driven
39 Tests (avg: 5th)
Falken Azenis FK510

Falken Azenis FK510

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
8.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
82.2
2x / 101 tests
Comfort
71.1
0.32x / 27 tests
Dry
67.7
1.8x / 69 tests
Value
67.4
0.42x / 44 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
79.9
61 tests
Handling
73.4
74 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 39
Publications: 13
Period: 2016 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 150
Avg Rating: 81.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.37
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test Tire Rack 2025 275/35 R19 7/10 9 metrics
2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2022 245/40 R19 9/10 10 metrics
2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2022 225/45 R18 3/11 10 metrics
2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2022 245/45 R19 8/10 10 metrics
2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test Sport Auto 2022 235/35 R19 4/10 10 metrics
2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2021 225/40 R18 6/14 9 metrics
2021 ACE / GTU Summer Tyre Test ACE 2021 225/45 R17 3/9 0 metrics
2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 275/35 R19 5/8 11 metrics
2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 265/35 R20 7/9 8 metrics
2021 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 1/17 1 metrics
2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2021 225/40 R18 5/10 11 metrics
2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2020 225/45 R18 8/11 11 metrics
2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 265/35 R19 6/10 8 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 7/20 10 metrics
2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2020 225/40 R18 8/16 1 metrics
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 15/49 2 metrics
2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test EVO 2019 225/40 R18 7/7 9 metrics
2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2019 265/35 R19 4/8 11 metrics
2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test Sport Auto 2019 245/30 R20 7/8 10 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 3/20 11 metrics
2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test Gute Fahrt 2019 225/40 R18 10/12 4 metrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 6/45 2 metrics
2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test EVO 2018 235/35 R19 5/6 9 metrics
2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test Auto Express 2018 225/45 R17 5/10 0 metrics
2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2018 225/45 R17 2/11 9 metrics
2018 Ace 235/45 R18 Summer Tyre Test ACE 2018 235/45 R18 1/11 0 metrics
2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test Test World 2018 225/45 R17 3/16 7 metrics
2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2018 265/35 R19 4/6 8 metrics
2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test Sport Auto 2018 265/35 R19 4/9 8 metrics
2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2018 225/45 R17 3/9 8 metrics
2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test EVO 2017 225/40 R18 4/9 4 metrics
2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2017 245/40 R18 6/9 6 metrics
2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2017 245/45 R18 5/10 4 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 2/20 5 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2017 235/35 R19 4/9 4 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 3/43 0 metrics
2016 EVO Summer Performance Tyre Test EVO 2016 235/35 R19 9/9 0 metrics
2016 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test Auto Express 2016 225/40 R18 7/9 0 metrics
2016 GTU Performance Summer Tyre Test 2016 225/45 R17 5/14 0 metrics

Videos

The ULTIMATE tyre test! These are the best UHP tires you can buy for your car!

The ULTIMATE tyre test! These are the best UHP tires you can buy for your car!

39
Tests
5th
Average
1st
Best
15th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
7th/10
Well-balanced and easy to drive, the FK510 combines pleasant road manners with strong wet and dry traction. While it could use a touch more urgency in the steering and grip in the dry, it remains a harmonious, confidence-inspiring tyre that delivers solid results without major compromises.
Short braking and safe and easy to control in the wet.
ess sporty and very sluggish in the dry, low steering precision.
8th/10
Acceptable wet braking performance, good grip in the wet and dry.
Limited aquapaning resistance, poor balance in the dry, limited sportiness.
Well priced and essentially safe in the wet.

Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis FK510

Ask a question
September 19, 2018

Please can you tell me if it is safe to have an FK453 on nearside rear and FK510 on offside rear, on a Ford Mondeo Estate?

It is always recommended to change tyres in axle pairs, so mixing them isn't advised. There would be nothing inherently unsafe, but it could cause vehicle balance issues, especially in the wet.
November 2, 2018

Putting these Falkens on a 2007 911, are these tire able to be rotated from right to left?

The Falken FK510 is an asymmetric tyre so yes you can rotate it left to right.
June 8, 2019

Are Falken tyres (FK510) suitable for a Porsche Boxster S?

Assuming you can find the correct size and load rating you need in the FK510, there's no reason you shouldn't use them on a Boxster.
October 21, 2019

Are falken azenis fk510 tyres all season tyres?

The Azenis FK510 is a summer tyre.
November 4, 2019

Hi, I have Mazda 6 2.5 2008. I ride mostly 90% city + 10% curved countryside roads (I like enjoy them). The best solution is buy Michelin Pilot Sport 4, I know, but it is 50-60% more expensive then FK510. I decide between FK510 and Goodyear F1 Asym 5. Question is - Should I pay 15 % more for Goodyear or there isn't too much better behavior for that higher price?

Have a watch of our big <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NcenJ0zmAY">tyre test</a> on YouTube, it should answer your question. In short, if you like handling, then the Asym5 is worth the extra.
April 5, 2021

I have a suv 4x4 with Bridgestone Dueler on front and rear axles. The rears have worn to 3.4mm in 15000 miles the fronts are on 5mm. I tow a caravan. Would Falken FK510 tyres be any better?

There is almost no wear testing for highly loaded tyres for reference, however the Bridgestone Dueler range of tyres have traditionally be good wearing tyres so I would be surprised if the Falken gave you extra treadlife. There would likely be improvements in wet performance and comfort.
May 12, 2021

Looking to put falken fk510 on my vauxhall gtc with 19" rims, new pair onto go on the front only. However, load rating for the falkens is 99, car already has 95 load tyres on the back which will stay on, and 95 is the norm for this vehicle. Will there be any difference with the 99 load on the front? Thanks

In theory the 99 load could have a slightly stiffer construction, but given they're different brand tyres front and rear that will be a bigger difference than the different load ratings fitted.
November 3, 2021

Is the Falken f510 suitable for rear drive wheels of a mercedes e250cdi amg convertable

Yes it is.
November 22, 2021

Are FALKEN AZENIS FR510 18” run flats

Falken do make the FK510 in certain runflat sizes.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 138 user reviews

Drivers largely praise the Falken Azenis FK510 for excellent wet grip, strong dry traction, and a notably comfortable, quiet ride (especially as a replacement for run-flats), all at a compelling price. Many report stable, confidence-inspiring handling and good aquaplaning resistance. The most consistent drawbacks are faster-than-expected wear and softer sidewalls that can reduce steering precision; several users also note grip dropping off as the tyre wears or in colder conditions. Overall sentiment is solidly positive for a value-focused UHP tyre.

Strengths
  • Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong dry grip
  • Comfort and reduced noise (especially vs run-flats)
  • Stable
  • Confidence-inspiring handling
  • Good value for money
Areas for Improvement
  • Fast tread wear/short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls and less precise steering
  • Grip declines as the tyre wears or in colder temps

Top 3 Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Mercedes Benz C200 w205 (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
I have fk510 on a c200 2020
The dry grip is good but in the wet the grip is super solid, in difficult rainy conditions i really felt safe with it.
We have another car with the Goodyear oem original mercedes ones ( c200 2021) and the driving experience is the same although the GY ones are more expensive
Maybe the only negative thing is that I don't think they're helping the mileage since they're very grippy.
Highly recommened
February 9, 2025
Given 77% while driving a SEAT Leon 5F 1.0 TSI (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 35,000 spirited miles
I used the tires in Singapore where it’s hot throughout the year with the seasonal monsoon, and occasional drive up to Malaysia (300km+ one way).

Got these tires because of the good pricing with good reviews and it did not disappoint. The dry grip and handling is really good, can really feel the car sticking to the roads especially when taking corners at higher speeds. However, for wet weather grip, it is just slightly less grippy, but still does well with the handling.

Road feedback wise is average but better than my previous tires. Did around 50k km with the tires and was overall really satisfied. After a year of usage then I started to feel the grip losing out a little.

Would recommend the FK510 over FK520 as the grip feels better and I feel more confident taking corners on the FK510. Additional bonus is that it is one of the more affordable set of good tires.
March 7, 2025
Given 63% while driving a Lexus IS350 (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 19,457 average miles
Pretty average, nothing special, staggered fitment front tyres on my Lexus IS350, they replaced the Japanese Bridgestones that were on the car when I bought it (it's a Japanese import car) -- NZ roads are pretty hard on tyres, and very noisy roads, since most here are chip-seal, the tyres didn't really seem that amazing from a handling perspective but I don't drive super hard-out so who knows if they're great, the FK510s wore out after 31,314kms... replaced by some Nexen Nfera AU5 so we'll see how those go when they wear out.
February 25, 2025

How would you rate the Falken Azenis FK510?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 76% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 12,000 easy going miles
Had the Falken Azenis FK510 run flats come already installed when I bought my BMW 420i. They likely had 6-7mm tread, and I have had them replaced now as 3mm tread remaining and 13,000 miles done. At this low tread, they were slipping/sliding quite abit now especially doing 70mph on motorway so safest thing to do was get them replaced and I've gone for another brand of tyres. The Falkens were good tyres, and never gave any issues. Never experienced a flat tyre or puncture even when going quite hard over potholes or rough road surfaces. I'm not a spirited driver but have gone up to 80mph and felt confident in these tyres. Have driven in the cold and warm temperatures over the last few years, and these tyres felt reassuring without any worry of aqua planning or spinning out of control. Overall, definitely a good tyre in my experience.
January 4, 2026
Given 88% while driving a Infiniti Q50 (225/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
My car came with S001 RFT. This was my first "warm sedan". The ride seemed too stiff. Handling was uncommunicative; like on the rails. After they wore out, I got PS4 (non-RTF) thinking the road feedback would improve. It did not. Mind you, I do not do race tracks. I am driving exclusively in the city and on highways. I want the steering wheel communicate the interaction of the car with the road. The car just felt numb on roundabouts. The car was "skipping" in turns that indicated a firm sidewall and stiff tread.

So I got thinking. And I decided that the culprit was the sidewall that was too firm. I wanted to have a flex in the sidewall or in the tread lugs when I was doing turn around a corner or in roundabouts, the front tyres would flex, and would then push the car in the opposite direction. So I found from reviews that the Hankook and Falken UUHP tyres had softer sidewalls which, in opinion of some people, made them similar to the touring tyres.

With that thought, when the PS4 wore out, I got Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3. I gave up on my snobbery against "lesser-branded" tyres. Indeed, the Hankook had softer sidewalls, and handling had that pliable feel that I was looking for. The tyre performed 90% of the PS4 while costing 2/3 of it. I was pleasantly surprised with the Hankook tyre. It lasted 32k km versus 30k km for PS4. I thought I would be getting it again.

When the Hankooks wore out, I could not get it in my favourite online store. But it was OK with me, as I wanted to try the other hero of the crowd: the Falken Azenis. I had a choice between the FK510 and FK520 model. First, I set my eyes on FK520, as this was a newer model (therefore, it was better ?). However, further thinking threw an idea at me that the older model FK510 could have a thicker sidewall unlike the more modern FK520 that apparently was made with the stronger but thinner sidewall materials. My Hankook was of the same ilk, and I did not quite like it. It was too sensitive to air pressure. It depended on airpressure for the ride not on the stiffness of the rubber in the sidewall. The FK510 seemed to be of the older generation that I liked. So... FK510 was much cheaper in my favourite store (which indicated it was several years old). It was half price of PS4. The final convincing fact came from the review of the Singaporean gentleman in here, who said that FK510 had a better dry grip than FK520, thus he recommended it. So, I was set on FK510.

I got the tyres, and I was happy I got them. I noticed straight away that it had that "pliable" feeling in handling that I was looking for. Now, the road provided a lot of feedback to me through the steering wheel. (I think it also has to do because of a lot of sipes in the lugs as is compared to the larger solid lugs in FK520). The feeling was better than that in the previous Hankooks. The tyres were 3 years old, but that was OK, as I did not feel shortchanged in terms of the grip. The tyres were made in Japan. Also, the tyre design had a pronounced rim protector that I liked a lot. So, it turned out the best tyre for me so far on this car.
August 31, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 72% while driving a Mercedes Benz E430 (265/35 R18) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
After 20,000km, the tire tread has worn down to less than 3mm. Mercedes Benz E430 V8 rear tires. Very good in terms of aquaplaning, even in size 265/35/18! The tire is quiet, does not make noise. It may be a bit soft for sporty driving, but very comfortable for everyday driving. Very good price-quality ratio!
August 13, 2025
Given 77% while driving a BMW 520i (245/40 R19) on mostly town for 25,000 spirited miles
Using this tire for my BMW 520 for almost 2 years with around 26k KM. Road noise is acceptable. Love the grip in dry. It give you confidence to take corner.
June 6, 2024
Given 91% while driving a Volvo XC60 (255/50 R19) on mostly country roads for 30,000 spirited miles
THE BEST TIRE I EVER HAD.
BUT TIRES MADE IN JAPAN
THE SAME TIRE MANUFACTURED IN TURKEY IS GARBAGE!
April 23, 2024
Given 56% while driving a Hyundai Coupe 2.0L (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10 spirited miles
Do not buy this tyre or ANY hard compound tyre if you drive a Hyundai Coupe, especially a TSIII with factory lowered suspension, you will feel every single imperfection in the road and the ride comfort is absolutely abysmal. This car cannot handle hard compound tyres, fit a soft compound like Bridgestone Turanza.
January 29, 2024
Given 81% while driving a BMW 320D xDrive Gran Turismo (225/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
Good tyres, maybe little too soft but overall very good. Good and stable in the rain.
December 8, 2023
Given 96% while driving a Mercedes Benz C220 cdi (255/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
I’ve driven Pirelli Cinturato P7 and Goodyear aswell on Mercedes C class and I can say that Pirelli is the worst especially in the wet. Comparing Goodyear and Falken they are both worth the money, the only difference is the wear where Falken is not that good. But since Goodyear and other high end price tyres can be double of Falken price, I would definetely recommend Falken.
October 24, 2023
Given 64% while driving a Citroën C5 (245/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 22,000 spirited miles
The tires were fitted to the car since I bought it (used). They were 1.5 years old when I bought the car, with 15000 km (8000 miles) fitted beginning of 2020. I have done 20k km with the car since, so tires changed at 35k km.
From 15-20000 km they were performing really good, dry and wet conditions. At around 20k I had swapped front and back ones as wear was pretty high at the front, and from 20-25k wet grip was fading. I had also experienced balancing issues (around 120+ km a mild rattling of the steering wheel).
I would say that for the first 20k it's a really high performance tire, as grip was amasing, dry and wet, but as it wears out it starts becoming more and more slippery. At the end of their life they were kind of dangerous in the wet, and 35k kilometers (~28k miles) it's not that high for the price of 18 inch tires (rears were at the same level as the legal limit indicators). I have gone to something completely different (higher profile 17 inches to try how my hydractive suspension behaves) so I cannot give a direct comparison, obviously the new tires are grippier than the almost slick falkens :p
August 21, 2023
Given 73% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI 7.5 (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
Just had these fitted on my 300HP tuned MK7.5 Golf GTI. So this review will be initial impressions after a few hundred KM of city and highway driving. I will not be able to comment on the tyre wear right now. I will be comparing the FK510 to the Bridgestone RE004 that I was using prior.

Dry grip is good. Very close to the RE004. Definitely more than adequate for daily driving. Even when cornering at speed, the tyres grip well and don’t squeal much. Wet grip is slightly better than the RE004. The RE004 felt a bit nervous when driving quickly on wet roads. But on the FK510, there is less aquaplaning and the car feels more planted.

Feel wise, the RE004 is noticeably stiffer than the FK510. As a result, the FK510 just doesn’t feel as sharp or darty through corners. A nice handling tyre but just not sharp enough to compete with the best in this mid-range UHP segment. However the FK510 is more comfortable and absorbs bumps better.

Overall, a good UHP tyre for daily driving but definitely not the best in the segment in terms of handling. I wouldn’t buy these again as I prioritise driving enjoyment over all else but for someone who wants a jack-of-all-trades tyre for their daily driver. The FK510 is a good choice.
August 7, 2023
Given 78% while driving a Subaru BRZ (245/40 R17) on mostly motorways for 2,000 average miles
I bought these after about a month of searching for 245 wide tires that won't explose my budget, since I wanted some more meat under my BRZ. The sidewall feels softer than my previous set, but it's probably only due to the increased size (going from 215 on a 7in to a 245 on a 9in). Overall the tire has great grip, wether its cold, warm or wet. Tried a single session on them at a local racetrack, and they held very well! No understeer or oversteer even after pushing. I do have a slightly aggressive alignment, which may help. Overall its a great tire for a fun daily driver, maybe not as good as the top dogs in the UHP category, hopefully after some more miles they still shine.
June 11, 2023
Given 67% while driving a Volkswagen Passat B7 (235/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 20,000 spirited miles
Bare in mind before you read this review, I had these tires on a 170 HP VW, so I might not have the most fair review... but man these tires rock. I can never break traction in the dry, and almost never do in the wet. Only complaint is they don't last at all.
May 5, 2023
Rate the Falken Azenis FK510