Menu

2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Wet
  2. Dry
  3. Results
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
  6. Continental Premium Contact 6
  7. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
  8. Falken Azenis FK510
  9. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
  10. Toyo Proxes Sport
  11. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
  12. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
  13. Maxxis Premitra HP5

Test Summary
Wet Braking Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Dry Braking Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Wear Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rolling Resistance Continental Premium Contact 6
Noise Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Snow Handling Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Toyo Proxes Sport
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Falken Azenis FK510
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
For 2017, Auto Motor und Sport have tested ten 245/45 R18 ultra high performance tyres using a BMW 3 Series Estate.

This test is the first time the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Continental Premium Contact 6 have appeared in the same test, which should give us some interesting data about the two big rivals.

Wet

Over the previous few years, Continental  have been the masters of the wet testing, but this time the wet tests were largely dominated by Michelin. The French manufacturer won the all important wet braking and wet handling tests, scored well in the wet circle and straight aquaplaning tests, but showed weakness in the curved aquaplaning test, finishing ninth of ten.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
    28.70 M
  2. Falken Azenis FK510
    29.40 M
  3. Continental Premium Contact 6
    29.60 M
  4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    29.90 M
  5. Toyo Proxes Sport
    30.00 M
  6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    30.70 M
  7. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    32.70 M
  8. Maxxis Premitra HP5
    33.10 M
  9. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    33.50 M
  10. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    33.70 M

The new Continental could only manage third overall in wet braking, and sixth overall in wet handling. Like the Michelin, the Continental struggled in aquaplaning tests, finishing last overall in curved aquaplaning.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
    70.90 Km/H
  2. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    70.30 Km/H
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    70.20 Km/H
  4. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    70.00 Km/H
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    70.00 Km/H
  6. Continental Premium Contact 6
    69.50 Km/H
  7. Maxxis Premitra HP5
    69.10 Km/H
  8. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    69.00 Km/H
  9. Toyo Proxes Sport
    68.00 Km/H
  10. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    67.70 Km/H

Dry

Pirelli and Michelin traded first and third position for the two key dry tests. Michelin won the dry braking, with Pirelli in third, and Pirelli posted the fastest dry lap time, with Michelin third.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
    34.20 M
  2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    34.60 M
  3. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    34.80 M
  4. Continental Premium Contact 6
    35.00 M
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    35.40 M
  6. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    35.50 M
  7. Maxxis Premitra HP5
    35.70 M
  8. Falken Azenis FK510
    36.40 M
  9. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    36.90 M
  10. Toyo Proxes Sport
    37.20 M

Continental comparatively struggled again, fourth in dry braking, and could only match its wet handling result, finishing sixth fastest in dry handling.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    88.60 Km/H
  2. Toyo Proxes Sport
    88.10 Km/H
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
    87.60 Km/H
  4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
    87.50 Km/H
  5. Maxxis Premitra HP5
    85.70 Km/H
  6. Continental Premium Contact 6
    85.60 Km/H
  7. Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
    85.50 Km/H
  8. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    85.30 Km/H
  9. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
    84.90 Km/H
  10. Falken Azenis FK510
    84.70 Km/H

Under rolling resistance testing, the Continental proved best, a long way ahead of second place Vredestein. Michelin could only take seventh in this test, leading the testers to hypothesise Continental have traded too much rolling resistance in improved tread wear for wet grip.

The full results are below. Auto Motor und Sport weight the scores 50% wet, 40% dry and 10% rolling resistance / noise.

Results

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

245/45 R18
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 53.7
Dry 9.8
Wet 9.5
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 10
Overall 9.4
2nd

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

245/45 R18
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 51
Dry 9.9
Wet 8.3
Comfort 10
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 7
Overall 8.8
Continental Premium Contact 6
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 51.3
Dry 8.8
Wet 8.1
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 7
Overall 8.4
4th

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

245/45 R18
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 49.1
Dry 8.5
Wet 8.4
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 10
Overall 8.2
5th

Falken Azenis FK510

245/45 R18
Falken Azenis FK510
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 47.4
Dry 7.7
Wet 8.7
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 10
Overall 8
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 49
Dry 9
Wet 7.1
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 10
Overall 7.9
7th

Toyo Proxes Sport

245/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 47.6
Dry 8.4
Wet 7.4
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 10
Overall 7.8
8th

Vredestein Ultrac Satin

245/45 R18
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 44.3
Dry 7.9
Wet 7.7
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 7
Overall 7.7
9th

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2

245/45 R18
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 43.5
Dry 8.4
Wet 7.1
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 7
Overall 7
10th

Maxxis Premitra HP5

245/45 R18
Maxxis Premitra HP5
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 40
Dry 7.4
Wet 6.7
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 7
Overall 6.9

comments powered by Disqus