Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Dunlop All Season 2
Dunlop counters with standout durability and value. It repeatedly tops mileage and wear metrics by sizable margins and shows stronger snow and ice capability. The trade-off: longer dry and wet braking and slightly weaker aquaplaning resistance versus the Bridgestone, but a compelling long-term cost case and winter reassurance.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | four | |
| Dunlop All Season 2 | one |
While it might look like the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is better than the Dunlop All Season 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading dry and wet braking (≈8-12% shorter vs Dunlop across tests)
- Stronger aquaplaning resistance (notably +9.7% straight-line in AutoBild 2025)
- More precise dry/wet handling feel and higher safety reserves
- Multiple overall test wins (4/5) and top braking rankings
- Outstanding wear and mileage (+16-33% projected vs Bridgestone)
- Better snow and ice performance (wins in snow brake/traction/handling, ice brake)
- Lower rolling resistance and solid fuel results
- Best value scores (lower cost per 1,000 km)
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 10.93% less distance than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 1.88% faster around a lap than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 9.81% less distance than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 4.23% less distance than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 0.89% faster around a wet lap than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 1.5% faster around a wet circle than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 floated at a 5.84% higher speed than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slipped out at a 1.69% higher speed than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 stopped the vehicle in 7.15% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Braking: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 had 7.57% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 was 1.79% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 provided 4.16% more lateral grip than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Circle: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 1.28% faster through a slalom than the Dunlop All Season 2.
Best In Snow Slalom: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 stopped the vehicle 4.52% shorter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Ice Braking: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 measured 0.49% quieter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Noise: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during three wear tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 is predicted to cover 18.95% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wear: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during three value tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 proved to have a 25.07% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Value: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 had a 10.54% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 used 0.76% less fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Dunlop All Season 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Dunlop All Season 2 emitted 22.39% less particle wear matter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Abrasion: Dunlop All Season 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 highly, praising its strong wet and dry grip, excellent aquaplaning resistance, and reassuring performance in light snow for an all-season tyre. Many also note good comfort and low noise, with several reporting slow wear and long expected tread life. The main trade-offs are a muted steering feel that reduces driving engagement and slightly higher rolling resistance/fuel use. Overall, it's a safe, confidence-inspiring choice with a few comfort/feedback compromises.
Based on 30 reviews with an average rating of 80%
Dunlop All Season 2 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Dunlop All Season 2 report a strongly positive experience overall, with standout wet grip and reassuring all-season performance. Many highlight excellent tread life and overall safety/confidence, with some even calling it the best tyre they've owned. A minority note elevated noise or squeal, and a few mixed comments appear on sporty/dry handling, but these are not widespread.
Based on 6 reviews with an average rating of 78%
Conclusion
Dunlop shines as the endurance and winter specialist. It posts the best mileage by 16-33% in key tests, lower abrasion, better rolling resistance, and superior snow/ice metrics. If you face regular winters or want the strongest cost-per-kilometre story, the All Season 2 is hard to beat, despite its longer wet/dry stops. Bottom line: Bridgestone for year-round road safety in temperate climates; Dunlop for high-mileage value and winter-focused all-season use.
Key Differences
- Braking: Bridgestone stops shorter on both dry and wet in every shared measurement (typically 8-12% advantage).
- Aquaplaning: Bridgestone has stronger straight and generally better curved resistance; Dunlop only edges curved aqua in one test.
- Winter: Dunlop leads on snow braking/traction/handling and ice braking; Bridgestone is comparatively weaker on snow.
- Mileage/Wear: Dunlop delivers 16-33% higher projected mileage and lower abrasion across tests.
- Efficiency: Dunlop shows lower rolling resistance; real-world fuel very close with a slight Dunlop tilt.
- Value: Dunlop's lower cost-per-1,000 km consistently wins the cost chapter; Bridgestone trades value for higher safety performance.
Overall Winner: Dunlop All Season 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Dunlop All Season 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.