Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
The data consistently shows the Bridgestone leading in safety-critical wet and snow metrics, plus braking performance in the dry, while Falken counters with slightly sharper dry handling and lower noise in several tests. If you're choosing between everyday assurance in mixed climates versus a drier-road, sportier edge, the contrasts here are clear.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | five |
While it might look like the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is better than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently shorter wet and dry braking (5/5 category wins in both)
- Class-leading snow capability (traction/handling/braking across tests)
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
- Better efficiency and longevity (lower RR/fuel; standout wear result)
- Sportier dry handling feel (wins several dry handling events)
- Lower noise in multiple tests
- Competitive wet/dry braking for the price
- Attractive value positioning
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 3.58% less distance than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was 0.71% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was 0.51% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 2.94% less distance than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was 0.57% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 2.17% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 0.98% faster around a wet circle than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 floated at a 5.09% higher speed than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slipped out at a 2.27% higher speed than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 7.22% less distance than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Snow Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 accelerated 13.43% faster than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Snow Traction: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had 7.54% better snow traction than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Snow Traction: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 2.08% faster around a lap than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 4.83% faster around a lap than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 12.82% faster through a slalom than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Snow Slalom: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 scored 7.14% more points than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was better during three noise tests. On average the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro measured 0.39% quieter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Noise: Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tyre Weight
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro weighed 2.42% less than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Tyre Weight: Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is predicted to cover 31.08% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Wear: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one value tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 proved to have a 14.29% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Value: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had a 5.35% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 used 3.19% less fuel than the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
In total the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 has been reviewed 31 times and drivers have given the tyre 81% overall.
The Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tyre 87% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Conclusion
The Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro appeals to drivers prioritizing crisp dry handling and a quieter cabin, especially in milder regions with infrequent snow. However, its weaker snow capability and generally longer wet stops make it less confidence-inspiring in poor weather. For most all-season buyers-commuters, family vehicles, and SUV owners-the Bridgestone is the safer, more versatile choice. Enthusiasts in temperate climates who value steering response at a keener price may prefer the Falken.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Bridgestone wins all 5 shared tests; Falken wins none
- Wet safety: Bridgestone leads wet braking in every test (e.g., −2-6% stopping distance)
- Aquaplaning: Bridgestone has stronger straight/curved aquaplaning resistance
- Snow performance: Bridgestone markedly stronger (e.g., +12-22% in several SUV snow metrics)
- Dry performance balance: Bridgestone stops shorter; Falken steers/handles slightly quicker on dry laps
- Efficiency and wear: Bridgestone shows lower rolling resistance/fuel and far better mileage in Auto Bild
Overall Winner: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.