Menu

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R VS Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS VS Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R

Overall test winnerMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS, Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R and Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R are regarded as three of the fastest road-legal track day tyres in the world.

Tyres tested
3
Tested size
325/30 R21
Disciplines
5

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

3 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

How the results are weighted

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

+Incredible dry braking, very fast first lap pace, low levels of drop off. Excellent steering precision and feedback.

−High levels of aquaplaning and low grip in the wet.

Read full verdict
Joint2nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS

+Very fast first lap pace, the best steering precision and feedback through the wheel.

−Moderate levels of time drop once the tyre has had its best, high levels of aquaplaning and low grip in the wet. Relatively long wet braking.

Read full verdict
Joint2nd

Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R

+Excellent wet grip, in both wet braking and wet handling. Relatively low levels of aquaplaning. Stable lap times in the dry and easy to drive fast.

−Relatively long dry braking and relatively average grip in the dry. Rear aquaplaning in the wet.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R VS Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS VS Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R · 325/30 R21

TyreMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 RGoodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RSPirelli P Zero Trofeo R
Position1stJoint 2ndJoint 2nd
Category scores (% of best)
Dry 39% of overall score100%96.1%93.6%
Wet 56% of overall score88.7%83.2%100%
Comfort 5% of overall score97.8%100%95%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Show full testing methodology

Score Weighting

Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.

TestWithin categoryShare of overall score
Dry · 39%
Dry Braking50%19.5%
Dry Handling50%19.5%
Wet · 56%
Wet Braking50%28%
Wet Handling50%28%
Comfort · 5%
Tyre Weight100%5%

Our standard methods

The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.

Dry Braking

For dry braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 110 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on clean, dry asphalt. I typically use an 100–5 km/h measurement window. My standard programme is five runs per tyre set where possible, although the sequence can extend to as many as fifteen runs if conditions and tyre category justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. Reference tyres are run repeatedly throughout the session to correct for changing conditions.

Dry Handling

For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tyre's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, depending on the circuit, tyre type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tyres so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.

Wet Braking

For wet braking, I drive the test vehicle at an entry speed of 88 km/h and apply full braking effort to a standstill with ABS active on an asphalt surface with a controlled water film. I typically use an 80–5 km/h measurement window to isolate tyre performance from variability in the initial brake application. My standard programme is eight runs per tyre set where possible, although the sequence can extend to as many as fifteen runs if conditions and tyre category justify it. I analyse the full set of runs and discard statistical outliers before averaging. To correct for changing conditions, I run reference tyres repeatedly throughout the session — in wet testing, typically every three candidate test sets.

Wet Handling

For wet handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit. I generally use specialist wet circuits with kerb-watering systems designed to maintain a consistent surface condition. ESC is disabled where possible so I can assess the tyre's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, depending on the circuit, tyre type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tyres so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable.

The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS, Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R and Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R are regarded as three of the fastest road-legal track day tyres in the world. To find out which of these three semi slick tyres reigns supreme, I've borrowed a 991.2 Porsche 911 GT3 RS, and have use of Michelin's tyre test facility in central France to run my own testing program.

Not being satisfied with just running dry handling, I'm going to test the tyres in wet handling, dry and wet braking, and of course the all important dry handling, to find out which tyre is fastest in which conditions.

Data

 

Front 265/35 R20

Rear 325/30 R21

Tyre DOT Code Weight DOT Code Weight
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS N0 1020 DMBK JM1R 11.05 3719 DMCB JE1R 14.29
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R N0 3519 6U0F 0HEX 11.14 0220 6U2U 00CX 14.76
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R 3819 XJX0 V683 11.34 4219 XJ19 V684 15.33

Dry

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
43.55 m Best
47.28 m +3.73 m
48.48 m +4.93 m

The difference between best and worst was 11.3% (4.93 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
63.2 s Best
63.2 s Best
64.9 s +1.70 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
38.15 m Best
45.68 m +7.53 m
50.73 m +12.58 m

The difference between best and worst was 33% (12.58 m ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
106.47 s Best
113.3 s +6.83 s
116.87 s +10.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (10.4 s).

Weight

Tyre Weight

Tyre Weight Per Set

Lower is better ↓
Tyre Weight
Position / TyreResultGap to best
50.68 Kg Best
51.8 Kg +1.12 Kg
53.34 Kg +2.66 Kg

The difference between best and worst was 5.2% (2.66 Kg).

Results

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R VS Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS VS Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

325/30 R21
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Test Winner — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — 2020
While the Cup 2 R is now equalled on first lap pace by the new Goodyear SuperSport RS, the longer run pace means its still the best in the category of extreme performance track tyres.
Dry100%
Wet88.7%
Comfort97.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (5)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 343.55 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 363.2 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 345.68 m+7.53 m
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 3113.3 s+6.83 s
Tyre WeightLower is better2nd / 351.8 Kg+1.12 Kg
Joint 2nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS

325/30 R21
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport RS
Dry96.1%
Wet83.2%
Comfort100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (5)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 347.28 m+3.73 m
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 363.2 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 350.73 m+12.58 m
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 3116.87 s+10.40 s
Tyre WeightLower is better1st / 350.68 KgBest in this discipline
Joint 2nd

Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R

325/30 R21
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
Highly Recommended — Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R — 2020
In this size at least, the Trofeo R should be a rival to the Cup 2, not the Cup 2 R. The Trofeo R was slower and softer in the dry, but had much better mechanical grip in the wet. As the lap times were more consistent, this is the type of tyre to fit if you plan on doing a lot of track days.
Dry93.6%
Wet100%
Comfort95%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (5)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 348.48 m+4.93 m
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 364.9 s+1.70 s
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 338.15 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 3106.47 sBest in this discipline
Tyre WeightLower is better3rd / 353.34 Kg+2.66 Kg

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

2 comments
  1. Enrico Azzoni archived

    Please forgive my english.
    I have watched the video yesterday, it was super informative with lots of datas and as usual the part I enjoy most was your subjective analysis and feedback. I must compliment you for making these videos really immersive and able to make us feel as if we were at the steering wheel appreciating the tyres and the enjoyment of driving a sport car.
    Best regards

    #5940
    1. TyreReviews Enrico Azzoni archived

      Thank you for taking the time to right, it is really appreciated. I'm glad you enjoyed the video!

      #5941
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.