Test Charts / Tyre Reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS

Name: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS
Creator: Tyre Reviews
Published: 2025-06-23

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size: 275/35 R19
Tyres tested: 3
Disciplines: 4

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Hoosier TrackAttack Pro	86 s	Best
2Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS	86.7 s	+0.70 s
3Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R	86.9 s	+0.90 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Dry Handling Long Run
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Hoosier TrackAttack Pro	86.83 s	Best
2Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R	87.48 s	+0.65 s
3Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS	87.56 s	+0.73 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling Long Run test finished less than 3% apart.

Dry Handling - Autocross
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS	40.8 s	Best
2Hoosier TrackAttack Pro	41.06 s	+0.26 s
3Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R	41.17 s	+0.37 s

All the tyres in the Dry Handling - Autocross test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R	10 Points	Best
2Hoosier TrackAttack Pro	9.75 Points	-0.25 Points
3Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS	9.5 Points	-0.50 Points

The difference between best and worst was 5% (0.5 Points).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Show full testing methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry Handling: 37–39 °C
Dry Handling - Autocross: 37–39 °C

Score Weighting

Weights express the scoring priorities, not how much each discipline actually changed the finishing order. The size of the performance gaps matters too. Category weights contribute to the overall score. Within each category, discipline weights divide that category’s share. Published finishing positions also need to be read alongside the editorial verdict.

Test	Within category	Share of overall score
Dry · 100%
Dry Handling	40%	40%
Dry Handling Long Run	25%	25%
Dry Handling - Autocross	25%	25%
Subj. Dry Handling	10%	10%

Our standard methods

The conditions above are recorded for this test. The descriptions below explain our standard procedures; measurement windows and run counts can vary by test.

Dry Handling

For dry handling, I drive at the limit of adhesion around a dedicated handling circuit with ESC disabled where possible so I can assess the tyre's natural balance, transient response, and limit behaviour without electronic intervention masking the result. I usually complete between two and five timed laps per tyre set, depending on the circuit, tyre type, and consistency of conditions. I exclude laps affected by clear driver error or obvious environmental inconsistency. Control runs are carried out frequently throughout the session, and I often use multiple sets of control tyres so that wear on the references does not become a meaningful variable. For more track-focused products, I also do endurance testing, which is a set number of laps at race pace to determine tire wear patterns and heat resistance over longer driving.

Dry Handling Long Run

For long-run handling assessment, I drive an extended session on a dry handling circuit, completing a high number of consecutive laps per tyre set. The average lap time across the full session is used rather than the best laps, capturing how consistent each tyre remains as it heats up under sustained high-load driving. This specifically tests thermal stability and performance degradation over extended use — a characteristic that standard short-format handling tests do not reveal.

Dry Handling - Autocross

For autocross handling, I drive the test vehicle on a short, tight course designed to exercise transient handling response and agility at relatively low speeds. I complete multiple timed runs per tyre set, with the fastest consistent runs averaged. The tight layout specifically exercises low-speed grip, steering response, and weight transfer characteristics that longer high-speed circuits may not fully reveal.

Subj. Dry Handling

I also carry out a structured subjective handling assessment at the limit of adhesion on a dedicated dry handling circuit. I score steering precision, steering response, turn-in behaviour, mid-corner balance, corner-exit traction, breakaway characteristics, and overall confidence using a standardised 1–10 scale used consistently across my testing. The final assessment combines numeric scoring with written technical commentary. I complete familiarisation laps on the control tyre before evaluating each candidate.

Read our complete testing methodology →

Tyre shortlist →Read the test →

More tyre tests