Menu

Hoosier TrackAttack Pro

The Hoosier TrackAttack Pro is the new extreme performance summer track tyre from Hoosier. It is a 200tw tyre, which aims to not only take on the track, but now the road. It builds on the performance of the hugely impressive Hoosier R7, and takes new racing technology from Hoosiers experience on track such as the feather weight carcass to make the ultimate streetable track tyre for the driver wanting the most focused road tyre possible.

9.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
0%
Road Feedback
45%
Handling
90%
Wear
30%
Comfort
45%
Buy again
25%
2 Reviews
54% Average
943 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 1st)
Hoosier TrackAttack Pro

Hoosier TrackAttack Pro

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
9.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
65.8
1.8x / 7 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
65.8
7 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2024 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 2
Avg Rating: 54.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.39
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS Tyre Reviews 2025 275/35 R19 1/3 4 metrics
Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs R7 vs Slick Tyre Reviews 2024 315/30 R18 1/3 3 metrics

Videos

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Hoosier TrackAttack Pro vs Bridgestone Potenza RE71 RS

Is This Now The FASTEST Tire Available? The New Hoosier TrackAttack Pro Tested

Is This Now The FASTEST Tire Available? The New Hoosier TrackAttack Pro Tested

2
Tests
1st
Average
1st
Best
1st
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Hoosier TrackAttack Pro was the fastest tyre on the big track, by nearly a second, and I think it would have been faster if a cat hadn't jumped out and spoiled its first lap. The Hoosier was also subjectively REALLY lovely, its steering was quick and direct like the Michelin, and while the rear axle didn't move quite as in sync, for a non-oe tyre I was genuinely surprised at how close it was. Make no mistake, the track attack pro is an epic tyre on track.

Highly Recommended 2025 Track Test 2 Hoosier TrackAttack Pro

Questions and Answers for the Hoosier TrackAttack Pro

Ask a question
July 21, 2025

Does this last as long as the R7 or A7?

Good question. On the road the Trackattack Pro will have a much longer treadlife, it's a treadwear 200 vs 40 for the R7. On track it might be closer, but we expect the TrackAttack Pro to outlast the R7 too.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the Hoosier TrackAttack Pro?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hoosier TrackAttack Pro Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 63% while driving a Porsche 1993 928 GTS (265/35 R19) on for 943 miles
Tire was grippy on track (dry), tolerated heat well, but heat cycled extremely quickly. Got 3 days of track on them. 4th day had no grip at all—wouldn't have run a 4th day, had I known prior to arrival at track. Overall, good and fast tire, but extremely short life. Higher resistance to heat than RE-71RS and even more so than CR-S. Marginally faster than both too, but expensive and needs replacing too frequently for most.
February 8, 2026
Given 54% while driving a BMW M3 (295/30 R18) on track for 0 spirited miles
I do about 15 track days per year in my dual duty F80 M3 with 295/30-18 square tires on 10.5x18. I'm advanced solo.

On Saturday I tried the TAPs at my home track of Lime Rock Park. It was a disappointment. The tires had 5 prior heat cycles at Watkins Glen, including an overnight "cure period" (one session one the first day, then 4 sessions on the second day.)

At WGI the tires were comparable to the RE71RS in terms of pace (similar theoretical ~206.5) and heat tolerance. Saturday at LRP felt like I was driving on heat cycled tires. The first session was meh and the grip got progressively worse. Weather was low 70's and sunny. I tried cool down laps and fiddling with pressures, but nothing helped. Meanwhile, back in steamy August I pounded on the RE71RS all day and was still able to consistently lap sub 60 seconds. See AIM solo snips below. Also, you can see me sliding around in the vid linked below.

The construction of the Hoosiers feel stiffer which provides quicker response/feedback on initial turn-in compared with the RE71RS. They feel good under braking. No squirm (probably due to the shallow tread depth). They don't make a lot noise at the limit.

The RE71RS sidewall roll on my outlaps until tire pressure builds. Not as bad as the AO52 though.
Track Attack Pro
https://youtu.be/DpMBrqrVQk0?si=bPbS9ktypaorLEjw

RE71RS
https://youtu.be/ob_VZpz4498?si=An7C6ylN71nPTe57

RE71RS lap times:


Hoosier lap times:
October 7, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Rate the Hoosier TrackAttack Pro