Menu

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

The Bridgestone Potenza RE11 is a Extreme Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
98%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
89%
Wear
77%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
96%
9 Reviews
87% Average
85,075 miles driven
Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Summer Premium
BETA
6.3 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 9
Avg Rating: 86.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.91
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Potenza RE11. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Bridgestone Potenza RE11 Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Mazda RX8 (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 18,000 average miles
Best tire. I've taken mountain road switchbacks with 25 mph signs at 50 mph and they won't break. I've literally had a friend as a passenger wet his jeans from the turns and acceleration out of curves. Even when they did break loose from the shift, they immediately gripped. No track time. Low hwy noise. 18k miles with tread left but I'm replacing them anyway. Going with a 255 size rear. Huge difference from others used.
Ask a question | Helpful 600
April 3, 2015
Given 81% while driving a Hyundai Avante (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 40,000 spirited miles
Awesome grip in the dry, almost surreal. Best tyres I ever used. Previously used ContiSportContact 3 and Michelin PS3, simply no comparison to the sheer grip level of these RE11. Give you an extra set of balls to go faster in the next corner every time.

Wear is relatively good, already 40,000km on these. They are a tad noisy and have a very stiff sidewall, almost perfectly flat. Looks awesome if you ask me. Will definitely buy again.
August 12, 2013
Given 80% while driving a Alfa Romeo (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I have these tyres on my Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon. One time, I drove in the middle of a heavy rain storm with fallen leaves and all, through some twisty bits, it almost felt like I was driving in the dry.
Ever since then, I have complete confidence in these tyres.
The grip is there from start, but road noise and wear is the trade off. They work better on a slightly heavier car. My friend's lighter Impreza WRX needs a little bit of "warming up".
December 31, 2014
Have you driven on the Bridgestone Potenza RE11 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Bridgestone Potenza RE11? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Bridgestone Potenza RE11 >

Latest Bridgestone Potenza RE11 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Alfa Romeo 75 or Milano Verde (US version) (205/50 R15) on mostly country roads for 175 spirited miles
PRIRACE.COM is all about testing and we did test this tire to its limits on the street. The pacific northwest is one of the best places to test anything street with its beautifully smooth roads that never seen to end along twisting rivers. The roads here rendor every scenario any track world wide has to offer even Laguna Seca's corkscrew, honestly. Our test vehicle was a nicely prepared (by PRI) Alfa Romeo 75 dedicated street V with light chassis tweeks. Nothing special just setup nicely with Koni reds, lowered at the rear just a bit (cut o.e. springs) and upgraded front brakes (cross drilled o.e. rotors, EBC green pads and S/S braided hoses) The 3.0L motor was gone through and messaged nicely by Chris Cancelli owner of PRI and elite engine builder/tuner. The engine makes an additional 45 hp bringing the 2700 lb. car to 225 at the flywheel @ 6000 rpm. This is just enough to keep your attention and your right foot a hankering to pivot forward, a lot! This rear wheel drive 4 door is a treat to drive for those of you who aren't familiar with this late eighties creation from Alfa Romeo. We drove this car to insane speeds out in the most remote areas and I must say the tires gripped exceptionally well when cold and extremely well when warmed but driven at track speeds consistantly for 15 to 20 minutes they got greasey creating a little more understeer than we wanted to experienceness with little to no run-off and thats why we gave it a progressive score of only 7. Now, we know we were well beyond the limits of what most sane people on a 'spirited Sunday drive" might pull off but the bad part was the air temp was only 74 degrees F. We gave the tire a 10 for dry grip because for the steet they are unbelievably sticky only when pressed for long periods did they grease up so unless you're shooting to be on one of those long police chases on the evening news these tires truly offer fenominal grip, quiet comfortable ride and work well in the wet too. Yes, we would buy again for the street but perhaps not so for track days, at least not with a car weighing over 2k.
October 20, 2010
Given 85% while driving a Renault Clio 182 Cup Pack (195/50 R15 V) on mostly town for 400 spirited miles
Outstanding grip in the dry (well above my old 205/45R16 Michelin Exalto PE2 which were only just over 1/2 worn.) Limited experience driving on wet roads with them so far, but when I have they have not put a foot wrong and I have pushed them a bit.
Very quiet inside the cabin and smooth riding. I have found they grip best at lower pressures (around 30psi front, 28 rear), higher and the car feels like it's squirming around more under load around corners?
I'm guessing they won't last long, but I don't drive this vehicle daily so don't care too much.
December 31, 2009
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!