The Falken Azenis RS820 performed well in noise, and in the wet it delivered a respectable braking result and decent aquaplaning performance. The main area it gave away time was wet handling, where it was towards the back of the group, and it also scored low on subjective wet handling. It's a good tyre but perhaps not as focused for enthusiasts as the tyres at the front end of this test.
Strong: Noise ·Weak: Dry Handling, Wet Handling, Subj. Wet Handling ·Winner: Pirelli P Zero R
Record by discipline
Where the Falken Azenis RS820 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
Record by discipline
Discipline
Tests
Avg finish
Field beaten
Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking
4
P4.8 of 7
38%
-
Dry Handling
4
P5.5 of 7
21%
-
Subj. Dry Handling
2
P6.5 of 8.5
28%
-
Subj. Road Score
1
P7 of 9
25%
-
Wet
Wet Braking
4
P5 of 7
35%
-
Wet Handling
4
P5.8 of 7
23%
-
Subj. Wet Handling
2
P7 of 8.5
20%
-
Wet Circle
1
P4 of 7
50%
-
Straight Aqua
4
P4.8 of 7
30%
-
Curved Aquaplaning
3
P5 of 6.7
28%
-
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
1
P5 of 8
43%
-
Noise
3
P4 of 6.3
34%
-
Value
Rolling Resistance
4
P4.3 of 7
49%
-
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Falken Azenis RS820. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
Across four UUHP summer tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 tends to land in the lower half of the field (avg overall 5.8), with one "Recommended" result but no podium-level overall finishes. The pattern is of a tyre that can be competitively close to the leaders in some dry objective measures (especially handling time/speed gaps) and shows consistently decent straight-line aquaplaning resistance, yet it struggles to convert that into strong overall rankings due to recurring deficits in wet braking and subjective/drive feel scoring.
The RS820's objective dry performance is typically mid-pack with relatively small percentage gaps to the best, but wet performance-particularly wet braking-shows larger losses and frequent bottom-tier placements. Comfort/noise and efficiency are mixed: it can be very quiet in one test, but is also bottom-ranked for noise in another, while rolling resistance is generally mid-pack without being class-leading.
Tyre Reviews · 235/35 R19 Tested by Tyre ReviewsRecommended
The Falken Azenis RS820 performed well in noise, and in the wet it delivered a respectable braking result and decent aquaplaning performance. The main area it gave away time was wet handling, where it was towards the back of the group, and it also scored low on subjective wet handling. It's a good tyre but perhaps not as focused for enthusiasts as the tyres at the front end of this test.
StrongNoise WeakDry HandlingWet HandlingSubj. Wet Handling WinnerPirelli P Zero R
The Falken Azenis RS820 is Falken's new contender that feels good but whose performance remains a little way behind the bigger brands. On the wet handling circuit it wasn't far off the pace and felt genuinely good. Positive, clean turn-in allowed early throttle to load the rear and punch onto straights with full traction, and it was easy to find and tread the limit in the quick inner sweeps. Generally there was good composure and adjustability, making it biddable and fun. In the dry its steering was encouraging, with a keen, connected feel. Around the handling circuit it was smooth and quiet but struggled to make late clipping points convincingly. There was some heaviness and delay through transitions, though it delivered solid traction out of hairpins and felt strong on the brakes. It wasn't the most refined on the road, with a bassy rumble over coarse surfaces and a sharp response to ridges. While it lacked the sharpness and bite of the best in the dry, it had keen steering feel and was good to drive, especially in the wet.
WeakSubj. Dry HandlingWet BrakingWet Handling WinnerBridgestone Potenza Sport
The Falken Azenis RS820 delivers convincing curve stability and secure driving characteristics with short braking distances on dry roads. Testers appreciated its harmonious handling with smooth transitions when pushing the limits. On wet surfaces, Falken reacted somewhat more aggressively to load changes compared to the top performers. The tyre showed particularly strong performance on dry surfaces with impressive cornering stability, though it struggled slightly with aquaplaning issues, where it ranked last in the curved aquaplaning test. Slightly louder rolling noise was also noted as a minor drawback.
The most budget-friendly option in the test, but the Falken Azenis RS820 struggled to meet the high demands of the powerful BMW M4. While it performed adequately on regular roads, it showed instability at higher speeds and quickly reached its limits on the racetrack. The tyre's front-to-rear grip balance wasn't well matched, making it difficult to maintain the desired line through corners. It also demonstrated weak wet grip and poor aquaplaning resistance combined with higher rolling resistance and more noticeable road noise.