I cannot recommend these tyres they are terrible on life span, maybe the worst ever in 50 years driving, sidewall cracked and fell apart after two years exposing cords , tred depth fine
Had six tyres in total all of them went the same way tried to claim under warranty but Mr Tyre would have none of it and said it was normal perished due to winter ect , never ever again will I use these tyres or Mr Tyres.
Mohawk Tyres
Budget brand
4 current Mohawk tyres, rated by 46 owner reviews covering 303,059 miles of driving.
- 4current tyres
- 46owner reviews
- 303,059 milescovered on them
The quick answer
| Pick | Tyre | The evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Summer | Mohawk M716 6.8 | TR Score 6.8 / 10 limited data so far |
| Owners' favourite | Mohawk M716 6.8 | 68% from 7 owner reviews |
Each season pick is the highest TR Score among the brand's current tyres; the owners' favourite is the highest rated by the drivers who run them. The full rankings and the evidence behind every pick are below.
The current Mohawk range, ranked
The highest scoring Mohawk you can buy today is the Mohawk M716, with a TR Score of 6.8 out of 10. 3 of the 4 current tyres have earned a score.
Summer Tyres 4
| # | Tyre | Category | TR Score | Owner rating | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Mohawk M716
|
High Performance | 6.8 | 68% | 7 |
| 2 |
Mohawk M105
|
High Performance | 6.4 | 61% | 10 |
| 3 |
Mohawk M112
|
High Performance | 5.1 | 43% | 28 |
| 4 |
Mohawk K112
|
High Performance | - | 79% | 1 |
Tables are ranked by TR Score, which rates each tyre out of 10 using independent test results and owner reviews weighted by how much evidence backs them. Unscored tyres link to their pages, where a review counts towards a score.
What drivers say about Mohawk tyres
Across 46 owner reviews and 303,059 miles of driving, Mohawk tyres average 51% overall. The scores below show where owners rate the brand strongest.
- Dry Grip 6.5/10
- Wet Grip 4.8/10
- Road Feedback 5.3/10
- Handling 4.7/10
- Wear 5.8/10
- Comfort 5.2/10
- Buy again 3.8/10
Question averages are weighted by review count across every tyre of the brand. Snow and ice scores come only from the drivers of the brand's winter-capable tyres.
The most recent reviews, in their own words
One word summarises these tyres up. Appalling. These tyres came with my car when I first bought it and the day I got rid of them for some Uniroyal RainExpert 3's was probably one of the best days of my life. The Uniroyals transformed the ride quality and handling of my car massively.
Where do I begin? The dry grip was poor and even relatively laid back driving could get them to squeal and lose traction. If you needed to get going at a junction or wanted a good set off, they'd judder and not provide good grip. The wet grip was appalling and even gentle set offs would result in heavy wheel spin and juddering. They provided 0 grip in wet and damp conditions. The handling felt imprecise and sloppy, with the grip levels being poor. I got to 60mph on a straight stretch of road and they felt very unstable! The ride quality was abysmal, making my car feel bumpy on even some of the best roads. They were very noisy as well. The wet and dry braking was poor. My fuel economy was terrible with these tyres on and they had some horribly soft sidewalls so it constantly looked like I had flat tyres, despite even bumping up the pressure slightly above what the manufacturer states. The only positive thing I can bring away is that they wore down at an alright pace, but I wouldn't even debate putting these on even if they lasted forever.
I doubt this tyre is even sold anymore, however if you find some, do avoid them.
Where do I begin? The dry grip was poor and even relatively laid back driving could get them to squeal and lose traction. If you needed to get going at a junction or wanted a good set off, they'd judder and not provide good grip. The wet grip was appalling and even gentle set offs would result in heavy wheel spin and juddering. They provided 0 grip in wet and damp conditions. The handling felt imprecise and sloppy, with the grip levels being poor. I got to 60mph on a straight stretch of road and they felt very unstable! The ride quality was abysmal, making my car feel bumpy on even some of the best roads. They were very noisy as well. The wet and dry braking was poor. My fuel economy was terrible with these tyres on and they had some horribly soft sidewalls so it constantly looked like I had flat tyres, despite even bumping up the pressure slightly above what the manufacturer states. The only positive thing I can bring away is that they wore down at an alright pace, but I wouldn't even debate putting these on even if they lasted forever.
I doubt this tyre is even sold anymore, however if you find some, do avoid them.
Had several of these tyres the main issue is the compound of the rubber seems degrade very quickly after a year or two they start to crack both in the tread and the sidewall, when taking them back to the fitting centre, usual excuses, temperature fluctuations or low inflation issues .
After two sets of these tyres I think I can rule out this and put it down to very poor manufacturers,
Never ever buy this brand you will regret it.
Tread wear is very good , price budget, but very poor value overall.
After two sets of these tyres I think I can rule out this and put it down to very poor manufacturers,
Never ever buy this brand you will regret it.
Tread wear is very good , price budget, but very poor value overall.
Utter rubbish , bought in 2019 and only doing 2000 miles a year by 2023 they were dry rotted and cracking up . Dry grips OK , wet grip was terrible - so much so my Mercs traction control had quite a work out just pulling out of junctions
We’re on the wife’s car when we brought it, less than 4000 miles the inner sidewalls were cracked around 90% of the wall down to the cords.
Who checks the inner sidewall of a tyre ?
Do NOT buy these tyres they are dangerous.
Who checks the inner sidewall of a tyre ?
Do NOT buy these tyres they are dangerous.
On the rear of a bmw m sport 325i
When I bought the car passed 1st mot
But failed 2nd mot as split on inner wall
Lots of tred left
Hard wearing tyres
Let down with splitting inner walls
Every Mohawk tyre on Tyre Reviews
The complete record, including discontinued tyres and tyres with too little evidence to rank, ordered by the amount of evidence. The most researched this month: Mohawk M105, Mohawk M112, Mohawk M716.
| Tyre | Season | TR Score | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohawk M112 | Summer | 5.1 | 43% | 28 | 101,152 miles |
| Mohawk M105 | Summer | 6.4 | 61% | 10 | 53,857 miles |
| Mohawk M716 | Summer | 6.8 | 68% | 7 | 143,050 miles |
| Mohawk K112 | Summer | - | 79% | 1 | 5,000 miles |
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests →The latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Run Mohawk tyres?
Review your tyres and help the next driver choose. It takes about five minutes, and every rating on this page came from a driver who took them.
Where this data comes from
Rankings combine independent test results with owner reviews submitted through this site, each naming the car, the tyre, the size and the distance covered. Reviews are checked by hand before publication, and the page rebuilds automatically as new evidence arrives.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 using independent test results and the full body of owner reviews, weighted by how much evidence backs them.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.