The Mohawk M112 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
The quick answer
Owners say43%from 28 owner reviews18% would buy againRead the reviews
Tests saySorry, we don't currently have any test data for the Mohawk M112
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated August 2023.
Across its range, the Mohawk M112 most commonly carries EU label ratings of D for fuel efficiency, D for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Mohawk M112?
Owners rate the Mohawk M112 4.6 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 25 reviews.
How well do the Mohawk M112 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Mohawk M112 5.3 out of 10 for wear across 25 reviews. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 2,250 miles.
Would owners buy the Mohawk M112 again?
18% of owners say they would buy the Mohawk M112 again, based on the 28 owner reviews that answered the question. 7% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Mohawk M112's wet grip?
Of the 25 owner reviews analysed for the Mohawk M112, 15 mention wet grip: 2 praise it (confident wet grip) and 13 criticise it (weak wet grip). One owner wrote: "wet grip was terrible - so much so my Mercs traction control had quite a work out". Read those reviews
More questions about the Mohawk M112(1)
What sizes does the Mohawk M112 come in?
The Mohawk M112 is available in 4 sizes, ranging from 205-245/40-65 R15-17.
Across 28 owner ratings the Mohawk M112 averages 43%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 5.9 out of 10 and Wet Grip lowest at 3.4. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 20% of owners score it 70% or better.
Owner ratings averaged from 28 ratings
Owner score43%
Dry Grip59%
Wear53%
Comfort46%
Road Feedback44%
Handling40%
Wet Grip34%
Featured reviews
Most helpful 30%
“Utter rubbish , bought in 2019 and only doing 2000 miles a year by 2023 they were dry rotted and cracking up . Dry grips OK , wet grip was terrible - so much so my Mercs traction control had quite a work out just...”
“can confirm everything said about this tyre. Lost the back end 90 degrees on roundabouts a few times whilst WET/DAMP. The wear rate is so bad my polo looks like it has a massive void in the wheel well now. I only drive...”
“these tyres aint bad. I brought our car with these tyres on it and i thought they where quite good ive done 14000 on them , ive had a advanced driving course so i no where the limit is on tyres ect. i also tow a...”
Utter rubbish , bought in 2019 and only doing 2000 miles a year by 2023 they were dry rotted and cracking up . Dry grips OK , wet grip was terrible - so much so my Mercs traction control had quite a work out just pulling out of junctions
Absolutely no lateral grip in the wet, noisy, hard compound spoils the ride and terrifying in the wet. Fitted to a car purchased a week ago second hand, replacing now with Fulda Eco Control, the exact opposite of these truly awful tyres.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Bought theze from HiQ Tyrez, having asked for medium range tyde. Never heard of them before but have now driven for around 1000 miles on them on the front. Have been OK in dry weather but with the first rain for a while, I have nearly scared myself stupid several times. I thought it was just a road surface problem at first but now don't trust the tyres. Pulling away from a junction in the wet, I get wheel spin most times. AVOID THESE LIKE THE PLAGUE!!!
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Mohawk M112? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
Have driven on these for a few hundred miles from brand new and were worst mistake I have ever made in tyre choice, should be banned as so dangerous grip in anything other than bone dry must be a Z in tyre rating and dry grip a F
These are the worst tyres I have ever owned. Put on for me by TRUST Ford Bradford. They must have really disliked me. They are dangerous and feedback from them is none existant. If you have some drive with caution.
Inherited Mohawk tyres when I bought an MX5 - lost back end several times on roundabouts in rain - replaced them with with Michelin Pilot Sport and the difference is unbelievable.
Bought tyres second hand 3 months ago, had no trouble whatsoever. I would say, the users with the grumbles have not looked closely enough at the tyre walls and seen the word ' outside' printed on them and put them on the wrong way round.
I inherited these tyres on my Saxo VTR (No, I'm not a boy racer - I'm in my 40's) and can quite confidently say they are dreadful in the wet, actually downright dangerous.
The tyres have very little wear, so it isn't down to their age. At the slightest hint of moisture on the road driving becomes more like a "skidpan" experience. Aquaplaning across two lanes on the motorway whilst only doing 55mph is not remotely amusing, nor is having to hold my breath every time I enter a roundabout. If you have these tyres, get them changed ASAP - the cost will pay for itself next time it rains.
89%
Member
Vauxhall
205/50 R16 W
250 miles
A Combination of Roads
Average
Used these for a few years now, small Corsa van. Average around 45-50k miles per set of tyres and they perform great all round. I do a lot of miles, sometimes 2 sets per year so have plenty of use/experience with them.
I had Federals and Hankooks before these and I rate the Mohawk's better in every respect.
All good for a semi budget tyre, and better than some big brand names
can confirm everything said about this tyre. Lost the back end 90 degrees on roundabouts a few times whilst WET/DAMP. The wear rate is so bad my polo looks like it has a massive void in the wheel well now. I only drive mainly motorway miles but the wear is worst i have ever seen.
WARNING: IF YOU CHANGE TO WINTER TYRES ON THE FRONT AXEL DO NOT LEAVE THESE ON THE BACK, the difference in grip between front to back will be dramatic and you will end up in a mess.
never buying again. currently looking for alternative tyre.
Inherited these on a recent second hand car purchase
Fairly mediocre in the dry, lack any real feedback at all
But that is not the highlight, the wet grip is like having banana skins on each corner.
Approaching a roundabout in mildly damp conditions at approx 20 mph - leisurely pace for the road, no real traffic (thank christ!) and the back end let go without any warning whatsoever. I mean literally no feedback that it was going to go, one minute planted and going around the roundabout from 6 to 3 o'clock position and at 12 o'clock position the back end swung out 90 degrees! Luckily managed to recover into a drift with a swift bit of steering and exit out of my intended target - all down to years of experience on the road, track and IAM advanced driving. If the wife had been driving the car would have been smashed no doubt at all.
Only slightly positive thing is that given they appear to be made from a non-wearing rubber compound they should last an eternity, assuming you don't write your car off in the wet of course!
