Menu

BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2

The BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
92%
Wet Grip
85%
Road Feedback
87%
Handling
84%
Wear
89%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
96%
24 Reviews
88% Average
345,665 miles driven
BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2

BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 24
Avg Rating: 88.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.08
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2

Questions and Answers for the BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2 Reviews

Given 89% while driving a Ford Mondeo (235/35 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 50,000 spirited miles
1 of the original rear tyres is still on the car circa 60,000 miles on, the fronts lasted for ~40k but have been replaced by another BF Goodrich tyre which is just awful. Would buy profiler 2's again.
March 21, 2015
Given 99% while driving a Hyundai Getz (185/55 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
great tyres
May 31, 2012
Given 99% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
The best tyre i ever had,even in wet
November 22, 2012

How would you rate the BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2?

Click a star to start your review

Latest BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2 Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Honda CIVIC 1.6 VTEC (195/55 R15) on mostly country roads for 48,000 spirited miles
absolutely the best tyres ever made, good traction and handling characteristics and very low wear rate. driven on crappy South African roads. its a pity BF Goodrich in no longer on the market. I would of bought then in a heart beat
June 5, 2013
Given 77% while driving a Ford MONDEO (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Put a set on my MONDEO 1,8TDCI ROTATED AFTER 12,500 MILES. REARS GONE AFTER 24,000 FROUNT STILL OK WIGTH 2.5MM ON THEM. GOOD VALUE TYRE AND GOOE WEAR. OVERALL VERY HAPPY CONSIDERING I ONLY GOT 14,000 MILES FROM A SET OF PIRELLI PZERO ROSSO
December 3, 2012
Given 79% while driving a SEAT Leon Cupra (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 2,000 easy going miles
These came on my new car, i can't say too much because they need replacing now but even when these are low on tread they still stick to the road when your giving it some!! I would buy again :)
November 28, 2012
Given 91% while driving a Nissan Skyline R34 (235/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Excellent dry and wet grip, couldn't ask anymore for a mid price range tyre.
September 11, 2012
Given 91% while driving a BMW M3 (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 10 spirited miles
Just perfect.

The grip is amazing, the braking is incredible, and under full acceleration, it doesn't lose grip at all. even in the wet I was stunned by the level of grip.


I would definitely buy again.
May 2, 2012
Given 84% while driving a Ford Focus ST (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
Good tyres, cheap @ £112.20 each and lasted 7,000 miles. Good in wet conditions and when turning at high speeds.
February 16, 2012
Given 89% while driving a SEAT Ibiza FR TDi (205/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Full set fitted at 19,000 miles and 24,000 miles from the front tyres with all kinds of driving not the quietest of tyres but great all round performance with good levels of warm up and grip in both wet and dry conditions.
Rears still going after 30,000 miles with about 3.5mm tread left am hunting for a new full set.
Put Hankook V12 on after and they spin up alot easier in cold conditions and seem to under steer more due to a softer side way.
All in all I will be buying profiler 2's again if I can get them good trye
February 1, 2012
Given 90% while driving a Opel MV6 3,2l turbo (478HP) (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
This is tyre for drivers.Yust to speeding cose it's my pleasure mostly over limit (100 Mph to 160Mph). G-Force is great tyre much better than many of others more expensives.Even on dry or at wet car is staying at road no metter how fast youare.I tryed many types but this are for high speed.Breaking is great even on dry or wet at any kind of tarmac surfaces.Only one thing is that first 5 min of driving don't squeze pedal to the flor, need time to get it in right temperature. For my opinion one of the best at the moment, the only one was better than this was Good Eagle F1 with simmilar rips.That was ''king''
April 3, 2011
Given 94% while driving a BMW E39 5 series (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
Fantastic tyre for the money highly impresses with these far better than the bridgestone Re050A that were on it
January 27, 2011
Given 88% while driving a Ford Mondeo (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Brilliant - just had to change my front tyres on a Mondeo ST TDCI - I did 30,000miles on these tyres - shame i couldn't get them again!!! Next time I will hunt around for them , but MOT next week so needs must!

January 4, 2011
Given 94% while driving a BMW e36 (245/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
Well back again reviewing some more rubber, my last review only 6 months ago on the Falken 452 I would change if I could I did not realise how dangerous they would become with wear more about that later.
Had a big problem thinking what to buy next as there are some good reviews but it appears to me that all tyre dealers have there own prefered tyre especially in the mid range section and probably get commission on selling these so after deciding on the BFG'S I had to do some hunting for a dealer.

After speaking to a few it was very clear that these tyres are a subsidiary of Michelin made in the same factory with basicly the same rubber so I wanted to give them ago after some good reviews.
I have left it a while before writting so as to give these a fair chance saying that I have just purchased two for for the front ( 225/45/17 ).

I have not been dissapointed these tyres are very good,I have found them to be very quiet with little road noise, the handling is fantastic they really stay stuck to the road,I have leaned on these and found nothing but grip all the way. I have noticed a vast improvement in ride comfort as the car does not skip about. These also have some pretty good rim protection with the wheels being nicely " set in ".
As I said I have just had some front ones fitted after the Michelin pilot sport 2's had finally seen better days after 26,000 miles and I cannot notice any difference in handling, saying that I had only just about managed to cover 100 miles or so on the new front tyres when driving down country I encountered very heavy rain.The BFG'S were great in wet weather with no aquaplanning even going through large puddles and flooded areas of road, I always felt they were on the road and all the grip was there even around tight bends on country roads.Down the motorways these sit nicely at speed and feel good.It looks like these are going to last as well as I have been running the rears for a while and there appears to be no alarming wear rate either.
So far so good then, I don't think anyone would be dissapointed with these so highly recomend them as I now have a matching set all round.

On the subject of the Falkens 452, had these on the rear before the BF'S after reading reviews, these ended up a total disaster once worn down which was not long only 2500 miles and 6 months of driving ( very poor value for money ) I thought as did my dad that something was wrong with the rear suspension on my car it skiped all over the place and God for bid you if it was wet these were a nightmare. I seriously thought something was wrong with the car, the ride was hard and uncomfortable and the back end was a accident waiting to happen. It just shows you you get what you pay for but in the case of the BFG'S it looks like you get a really good all rounder.I would say on price that these are maybe not as cheap and there are other alternatives but I think these are proving worth the money.
Not many reviews for these tyres on this site not sure if this is because these are hard to get hold of elsewere or what but hope this one helps.
August 22, 2010
Given 81% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 26,000 average miles
Bfgoodrich tyres had amazing wear compared to continental (premium continental) on the front of the car (front wheel drive). The goodrich have done an extra 80000miles more than my continentals did.i would recommend 100%
June 11, 2010
Rate the BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2