Menu

Mohawk M105

High Performance Summer

The Mohawk M105 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

The quick answer

Owners say 61% from 10 owner reviews 30% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say Sorry, we don't currently have any test data for the Mohawk M105

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated September 2026.

  • 10owner reviews
  • 53,857miles driven
  • 56sizes available
Mohawk M105 2 photos

Tyre Reviews Score

Mohawk M105

6.4/10

From owner reviews only: no measured test results yet.

  • Limited Confidence
  • 10 owner reviews

How this score is built

Better than Weight
Independent testsNo measured test results yet – 0%
Owner reviews10 owner reviews · rated 61% 20% 40%
Typical tyreWhere every score starts before its own data counts – 60%
Combined 34% 6.4

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Owner reviews decide 40% of this score. The other 60% is the typical starting point, and it shrinks as more reviews arrive.

Scored on owner reviews alone, a tyre is High once the reviews decide 90% or more, and Medium from 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as reviews arrive.
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Mohawk M105

Alternative Tyres
View All
LinglongLinglong Sport Master
Linglong Sport Master
8.9/1075% 14 reviews
Dry86Wet94Comfort70Value3Test scores
VredesteinVredestein Ultrac
Vredestein Ultrac
8.7/1077% 24 reviews
Dry75Wet89Comfort52Value18Test scores
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2
BFGoodrich gForce Profiler 2
8.5/1088% 24 reviews
Dry9.2Wet8.5Comfort8.5Wear8.9Owner ratings
BarumBarum Bravuris 3HM
Barum Bravuris 3HM
8.4/1085% 66 reviews
Dry8.8Wet8.3Comfort8.4Wear8.7Owner ratings
VredesteinVredestein Sportrac 5
Vredestein Sportrac 5
8.1/1085% 101 reviews
Dry51Wet66Comfort93Value83Test scores
MayrunMayrun MR500
Mayrun MR500
7.7/1085% 12 reviews
Dry8.8Wet8.6Comfort8.5Wear8.6Owner ratings
DavantiDavanti DX640
Davanti DX640
7.3/1072% 101 reviews
Dry7.9Wet7.1Comfort7.7Wear6.5Owner ratings
FirestoneFirestone Firehawk 900
Firestone Firehawk 900
7.2/1086% 5 reviews
Dry7.8Wet8.0Comfort9.0Wear8.8Owner ratings
TomketTomket Sport Series 1
Tomket Sport Series 1
5.8/1068% 9 reviews
Dry29Wet27Comfort8Value61Test scores
Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range49 sizes available

185-255Width35-65Profile14-20Rim78-103 H-YLoad/Speed Index2021First On Market

EU LabelAcross 49 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

69-73dB

Popular sizes225/45 R17205/40 R17215/55 R17225/50 R17235/40 R18235/50 R18
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Mohawk M105's EU tyre label rating?
Across its range, the Mohawk M105 most commonly carries EU label ratings of D for fuel efficiency, C for wet grip and 70 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Mohawk M105?
Owners rate the Mohawk M105 5.7 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 9 reviews.
How well do the Mohawk M105 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Mohawk M105 6.6 out of 10 for wear across 9 reviews. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 4,178 miles.
Would owners buy the Mohawk M105 again?
30% of owners say they would buy the Mohawk M105 again, based on the 10 owner reviews that answered the question. 30% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What sizes does the Mohawk M105 come in?
The Mohawk M105 is available in 56 sizes, ranging from 185-255/35-65 R14-20.
Owner Questions
Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Mohawk M105. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Mohawk M105 Owner Reviews

Review this tyre

What owners say

Across 10 owner ratings the Mohawk M105 averages 61%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 7.6 out of 10 and Handling lowest at 5.4. 3 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 33% of owners score it 70% or better.

Owner ratings averaged from 10 ratings

  • Owner score 61%
  • Dry Grip 76%
  • Wet Grip 69%
  • Wear 66%
  • Road Feedback 65%
  • Comfort 57%
  • Handling 54%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 58%

“Had several of these tyres the main issue is the compound of the rubber seems degrade very quickly after a year or two they start to crack both in the tread and the sidewall, when taking them back to the fitting centre...”

  • Ford Fiesta Zetec S
  • 4,000 miles
Read full review → 893 found this helpful
Most critical 10%

“We’re on the wife’s car when we brought it, less than 4000 miles the inner sidewalls were cracked around 90% of the wall down to the cords. Who checks the inner sidewall of a tyre ? Do NOT buy these tyres they are...”

  • Ford 05 Mondeo 185 (modded) diesel
  • 4,000 miles
Read full review → 909 found this helpful
Longest term 46%

“These were the worst tyres I have ever had. They came on the car I bought second hand and I couldn't wait to get rid. They are very hard and ruin the comfort of the car. Poor grip in the wet. The only positive thing...”

  • Volkswagen Passat
  • 10,000 miles
Read full review → 662 found this helpful

All 9 Mohawk M105 reviews

Score spread across 9 written reviews
69%
Member
Initial Impressions

I cannot recommend these tyres they are terrible on life span, maybe the worst ever in 50 years driving, sidewall cracked and fell apart after two years exposing cords , tred depth fine
Had six tyres in total all of them went the same way tried to claim under warranty but Mr Tyre would have none of it and said it was normal perished due to winter ect , never ever again will I use these tyres or Mr Tyres.

This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 7
58%
Member
Had several of these tyres the main issue is the compound of the rubber seems degrade very quickly after a year or two they start to crack both in the tread and the sidewall, when taking them back to the fitting centre, usual excuses, temperature fluctuations or low inflation issues .
After two sets of these tyres I think I can rule out this and put it down to very poor manufacturers,
Never ever buy this brand you will regret it.
Tread wear is very good , price budget, but very poor value overall.
Mohawk M105 owner photo
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 893
10%
Member
We’re on the wife’s car when we brought it, less than 4000 miles the inner sidewalls were cracked around 90% of the wall down to the cords.
Who checks the inner sidewall of a tyre ?

Do NOT buy these tyres they are dangerous.

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Mohawk M105? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Mohawk M105?
I drive something else - review any tyre →
697 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed
50%
Member
On the rear of a bmw m sport 325i When I bought the car passed 1st mot But failed 2nd mot as split on inner wall Lots of tred left Hard wearing tyres Let down with splitting inner walls
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 943
87%
Member
  • Ford Kuga
  • 235/50 R18 W
  • 3,201 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
New front tyres to replace OE fitment Continental SportContact 5 at 14,734 mi mixed urban commute and motorway miles. Tyre depot had a range of tyres in 235 50 18 including all-season and winter. I chose a set of Mohawk M105 based on EU tyre label wet weather C rating mainly. Garage guy said it was a popular choice and hard wearing plus it was half the cost of Continental. So far so good with 3,201 mi of motoring on the Mohawks. Wet grip is good and more importantly handling is sharper over original fitment tyres. Dry grip and comfort same as Continental. Why pay more?
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 918
87%
Member
  • 225/45 R17
Just replaced the Mohawks today. They have been on the car over the past 3 years since May 23rd 2016, covering 50000mll till today, May 22nd 2019!
I'm very impressed with their performance, considering they were on the driving axle of my C220 CDI estate.
Overall value for money has been great considering I bought the pair of them for £106.- fitted.
Overall grip has proven to be more than adequate from this "budget" tyre and longevity has been astounding.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 858
39%
Member
Don't buy these!!

12 months (4,000 miles) down the line still with 7mm tread = MOT Failure. Several splits all the way round on the inner tyre wall.

These could have been V.dangerous afterall who checks the inner wall.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 1,021
80%
ckracer76
Bought a set of budget Mohawk M105 225/50 R17 tyres for my Volvo as I couldn't afford premium/mid range tyre brand this time. Garage recommended them on the basis that the local taxi drivers swear by them due to high wear rate (like Michelin) and low price. Garage said every big tyre company has one or more sub brands and Mohawk are made by Hankook. Very pleased so far. Tyres are made in China. Wearing better than previous Bridgestone's and wet handling is better too. Coped well in recent cold spell including snow and ice although ride comfort got worse in cold weather. I am happy to recommend this budget summer tyre for normal roads/daily commute/average driving style.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 909
46%
Member
These were the worst tyres I have ever had. They came on the car I bought second hand and I couldn't wait to get rid. They are very hard and ruin the comfort of the car. Poor grip in the wet. The only positive thing about them is they last forever.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 4
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 3
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 662
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests

The latest Tyre Reviews tests

Summer Tyres

All Season Tyres

Winter Tyres

SUV and All Terrain Tyres

Track Tyres

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.