Menu

Yokohama Advan A052 Test Results

Tyre Reviews tests: 1 Tested 2019 to 2026 4 publications

Tested 6 times by independent publications, the Yokohama Advan A052 has taken 1 test wins with an average finish of 3rd.

  • 6Independent tests
  • 1Test wins
  • 3Podium finishes
  • 3rdAverage finish
  • 52%Field beaten on average
  • 4Publications

6 tests, 2019 to 2026

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 52%
The latest test

2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test P4 of 5

The Yokohama Advan A052 has the softest compound in the group, which was noticeable by hand during fitting. That softness makes it the clear wet weather leader - it was ten seconds faster than the next semislick in wet handling and matched the standard Michelin Cup 2 in wet braking despite having far less tread pattern. The ABS works particularly well with this tyre in the wet, keeping the car stable and predictable under hard braking. In the dry the story is different. The soft compound feels slightly vague and spongy, and the ABS has to work harder during dry braking, losing a few centimetres. Hot lap time is mid-pack, equal to the Michelin Cup 2 R. The long run is where it suffers most - it was very slow to come in on lap two and picked up a lot of rubber debris, degrading faster than the front-runners. If wet capability matters, for example on a road drive home from a track day, this is the strongest choice.

Strong: Wet Braking, Wet Handling Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling Long Run Winner: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS

Record by discipline

Where the Yokohama Advan A052 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 4 P3.8 of 5.5 46% 1
Dry Handling 6 P4 of 6.8 48% -
Dry Handling Long Run 2 P6 of 7 17% -
Subj. Dry Handling 2 P1 of 6 100% 2
Wet
Wet Braking 4 P2.8 of 5.5 54% 1
Wet Handling 2 P1.5 of 7 92% 1
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P2 of 7 83% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P1 of 7 100% 1
Subj. Noise 1 P1 of 7 100% 1

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Yokohama Advan A052. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind Compare with Potenza RE 71RS 3 0 3 - 0%

Against its own line

The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tyre Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Yokohama Advan A048 Predecessor 0 - - -
Yokohama Advan A052 This tyre 6 1 3rd 52%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 5 tests. Updated June 8, 2026.

Across five comparative tests, the Yokohama Advan A052 trends as a very high-grip, track-focused tyre with standout wet capability and strong overall pace, but with notable inconsistency in dry braking performance and endurance/heat management on longer runs. It can win outright in some line-ups (1st/5 in 2019) and regularly places near the front on lap-time style metrics (e.g., 2nd/3 in a 2025 extreme-performance shootout; 3rd/8 in a 2021 200TW test), but drops to mid-pack when the evaluation emphasizes braking stability or sustained performance (e.g., 4th/7 in 2026; 5th/7 in 2025 Tire Rack).

The clearest pattern is that the A052 is often among the fastest and most confidence-inspiring in the wet (including outright wet-handling dominance in 2026), while its very soft compound can feel unstable under heavy braking and can fade over longer dry sessions. Subjective ratings also skew positively (best subjective dry handling, comfort, and noise in the 2025 Tire Rack test), indicating a tyre that can feel excellent even when absolute objective metrics are not class-leading.

Performance Strengths

  • Wet Weather Performance (Wet Handling & Wet Braking) Strong
    Details
    • 1st/7 wet handling in 2026 AutoBild Track Day test (129.17 s), described as 'dominated the wet tests by a wide margin'
    • 2nd/7 wet braking in 2026 AutoBild (+0.4% from best, 47.2 m)
    • 1st/5 wet braking in 2019 test (16.55 m)
    • 2nd/7 wet handling in 2025 Tire Rack (+0.3% from best, 31.15 s)
  • Overall Track Pace / Dry Cornering Speed (single-lap style) Moderate
    Details
    • 1st/5 overall in 2019 test with 2nd/5 dry handling (+0.1% from best, 90.3 s)
    • 2nd/3 overall in 2025 AutoView extreme-performance test with 2nd/3 dry handling (85.16 s)
    • 3rd/8 overall and 3rd/8 dry handling in 2021 200TW test (+1.5% from best, 89.3 s)
  • Driver Feel / Subjective Qualities (handling feel, comfort, noise) Moderate
    Details
    • 1st/7 subjective dry handling in 2025 Tire Rack (8.75 points) despite 7th/7 objective dry handling (+0.8% from best)
    • 1st/7 subjective comfort (6 points) and 1st/7 subjective noise (6.25 points) in 2025 Tire Rack
    • 1st/5 subjective dry handling (10 points) in 2019 test
  • Wet grip Strong in 3 of 5 tests
    Details
  • Wet handling Moderate in 2 of 5 tests
    Details
  • Performance when worn Moderate in 2 of 5 tests
    Details
  • Dry grip Moderate in 2 of 5 tests
    Details

Performance Weaknesses

  • Dry Braking Performance & Braking Stability Strong
    Details
    • 6th/7 dry braking in 2026 AutoBild (30.98 m, +7.6% from best), described as 'spongy under hard braking' and 'weakest semi-slick here'
    • 6th/7 dry braking in 2025 Tire Rack (29.2 m, +2.1% from best)
    • 2nd/3 dry braking in 2025 AutoView (32 m, +3.9% from best) showing it is rarely best-in-test under braking even when overall competitive
  • Heat Management / Long-Run Dry Consistency (wear/fade) Strong
    Details
    • 7th/7 dry handling long run in 2026 AutoBild (+4.4% from best, 158.98 s), with note it 'faded in the dry long run due to its very soft compound'
    • Only 5th/7 dry handling long run in 2025 Tire Rack (+1.1% from best, 100.88 s) despite strong subjective scores
  • Wet Braking Variability (test-to-test inconsistency) Moderate
    Details
    • 3rd/3 wet braking in 2025 AutoView (30.7 m, +11.2% from best)
    • 5th/7 wet braking in 2025 Tire Rack (52.8 m, +11.2% from best) despite 2nd/7 wet handling (+0.3%)
  • Heat resistance Strong in 3 of 5 tests
    Details
  • Steering feel Strong in 3 of 5 tests
    Details
  • Tread life Strong in 3 of 5 tests
    Details
  • Dry braking Minor in 1 of 5 tests
    Details

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Yokohama Advan A052 (5 tests) and 12 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Tread life weakness in 3 of 5 tests 0 praise, 5 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Wet grip strength in 3 of 5 tests 5 praise, 2 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry grip strength in 2 of 5 tests 9 praise, 0 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Performance when worn strength in 2 of 5 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Aquaplaning resistance weakness in 1 of 5 tests 0 praise, 3 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Heat resistance weakness in 3 of 5 tests 3 praise, 1 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tyre

  • Cold-weather grip no test mentions it 4 praise, 0 criticise of 12 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 6

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
P4 of 5 Beat 0% of the field

2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test

Auto Bild 275/35 R19 gut (Good)

The Yokohama Advan A052 has the softest compound in the group, which was noticeable by hand during fitting. That softness makes it the clear wet weather leader - it was ten seconds faster than the next semislick in wet handling and matched the standard Michelin Cup 2 in wet braking despite having far less tread pattern. The ABS works particularly well with this tyre in the wet, keeping the car stable and predictable under hard braking. In the dry the story is different. The soft compound feels slightly vague and spongy, and the ABS has to work harder during dry braking, losing a few centimetres. Hot lap time is mid-pack, equal to the Michelin Cup 2 R. The long run is where it suffers most - it was very slow to come in on lap two and picked up a lot of rubber debris, degrading faster than the front-runners. If wet capability matters, for example on a road drive home from a track day, this is the strongest choice.

StrongWet BrakingWet Handling WeakDry BrakingDry Handling Long Run WinnerPirelli P Zero Trofeo RS

2025 2 tests
P2 of 3 Beat 50% of the field

2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test

AutoView 275/35R19

The Yokohama Advan A052 is a one-flying-lap qualifier tyre: superb feedback, tiniest steering effort, ties the RE71RS for fastest lap. Pay for it with the worst wet braking on test and a clear pace drop after the first lap. If your weekend is timed-attack singles, take this one; if it's stints, take the Bridgestone.

StrongDry BrakingDry Handling WeakWet Braking WinnerBridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

P5 of 7 Beat 33% of the field

2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test

Tire Rack 275/35 R18

The Yokohama ADVAN A052 maintained its benchmark reputation with a firm but composed road ride and moderate noise. Steering felt light and quick but lacked some immediacy compared to competitors. Wet testing showed good balance and strong traction but high susceptibility to hydroplaning with abrupt breakaway requiring careful management, though competitive pace was possible within limits. Dry performance delivered quick, consistent laps with strong braking and respectable grip, featuring confident steering and brute-force capability that made it easy and predictable to drive with manageable recovery. On the long road course it gave strong, confident performance with well-matched grip inspiring trust. The front end was accurate but could use more precision, yet it remained quick, predictable, and easy to drive hard with only modest, gradual drop-off. Wear was minimal with minor loss on intermediate ribs and outboard shoulder edges.

StrongSubj. Dry HandlingWet HandlingSubj. Wet HandlingSubj. ComfortSubj. Noise WeakDry BrakingDry Handling WinnerBridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

2022 1 test
P5 of 11 Beat 60% of the field

2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test

Tire Rack 225/45 R17

The Yokohama Advan A052 finished mid-pack, which surprised the testers as much as anyone. Its grip was obvious, but the balance didn't suit this car, and Tire Rack believe a chassis set-up that added front-end traction would have put it among the fastest.

WinnerBridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

2021 1 test
P3 of 8 Beat 71% of the field

2021 Track Day 200TW Tyre Test

Tyre Reviews 225/45 R17 Tested by Tyre Reviews Recommended

The Yokohama Advan A052 has a quick warm up and predictable friendly handling which makes it an excellent choice for the less confident driver, or those doing sprint / autocross style events.

WinnerBFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5

2019 1 test
P1 of 5 Beat 100% of the field

2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test

225/45 R17

Similar handling to the Trofeo R, but very novice friendly as it forgives over driving. The A052 doesn't require a strong warmup, and it keeps its peak grip for 2-3 laps before settling into its race pace. Even when worn to the limit the pace remains strong! Very high treadwear for a 200 tyre, 100-120 seems more realistic.

StrongDry BrakingDry HandlingSubj. Dry HandlingWet Braking

Back to the Yokohama Advan A052 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Yokohama tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.