Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 83% · 70
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 87% · 3
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Quatrac Pro 2 finished ahead 2 times and the AllSeasonContact 2 not once, with one level. The AllSeasonContact 2 averaged a 0.7% higher speed on the dry handling course; the Quatrac Pro 2 stopped 2.5% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 suits drivers prioritising wet and snow braking and lower exterior noise. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 suits drivers prioritising projected tread life and the balanced result it achieved in the SUV test.
Where the AllSeasonContact 2 is stronger
- About 11% longer projected tread life in Auto Bild's 2026 all-season test.
- Stronger snow traction in Auto Bild Allrad's 2026 SUV test.
- Shared second place with no major weak result in Auto Bild Allrad's 2026 SUV test.
Where the Quatrac Pro 2 is stronger
- Shorter wet braking in both full 2026 tests.
- Shorter snow braking in both full 2026 tests.
- Lower pass-by noise in both full 2026 tests.
Conclusion
In Auto Bild's 2026 all-season test, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 shared second place and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shared fifth. The Vredestein stopped about 3% shorter in the wet and 9% shorter on snow, had better snow traction and slalom results, and was quieter. Its straight-line aquaplaning result was also better in this size. The Continental remained competitive across the handling tests and matched the Vredestein's top comfort score. It also had a projected tread life about 11% longer and lost less rubber in the abrasion test. Auto Bild's 30-set braking ranking again placed the Vredestein higher, but used the same dry and wet braking figures as the full test.
Auto Bild Allrad's 2026 SUV all-season test gives a more even picture: both tyres shared second place. The Vredestein again stopped shorter in the wet, although the gap was only about 2%, and it was substantially quieter. It also stopped a little shorter on snow. The Continental had about 5% more snow traction and a stronger curved aquaplaning result. Its rolling resistance was lower in this test, the opposite of the full Auto Bild test. Dry handling differences in both sizes were under 1%, and wet handling was effectively level. The Vredestein's large snow advantage in the smaller size did not carry across the SUV test: the Continental was marginally faster in snow handling there.
Choose the Vredestein if wet and snow braking and low exterior noise matter most, particularly on the evidence from Auto Bild's 225/45 R17 test. Choose the Continental if longer projected tread life is a priority and you want the balanced performance it showed in the SUV test. Its wear advantage was measured in only one shared test, while the two tyres' aquaplaning and rolling-resistance results changed order between sizes, so neither is a reliable deciding factor across these tests.
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
AllSeasonContact 2 vs Quatrac Pro 2 at a glance
| Category | AllSeasonContact 2 | Gap | Quatrac Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 0 | 1 level | 2 |
| Dry5 measurements | 2 | The Quatrac Pro 2 stopped 1.3% shorter in the dry (3 tests) | 3 |
| Wet11 measurements | 2 | The Quatrac Pro 2 stopped 2.5% shorter in the wet (3 tests) | 9 |
| Snow8 measurements | 2 | The Quatrac Pro 2 stopped 5.7% shorter on snow (2 tests) | 6 |
| Comfort4 measurements | 1 | The Quatrac Pro 2 was 2.4 dB quieter (2 tests) | 2 |
| Value4 measurements | 3 | 1 | |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The AllSeasonContact 2 by 0.1 | 9.4/10 |
| Owner rating70 and 3 reviews | 83% | The Quatrac Pro 2 by 4 points | 87% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | +12.8% | The AllSeasonContact 2 was dearer in 2 of 2 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 140 | 40 sizes made in both | 43 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | AllSeasonContact 2 | Field | Quatrac Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P5 of 15 | P2 of 15 | |
| 2026 All Season Tyre Braking Test - 30 Sets | P8 of 30 | P6 of 30 | |
| 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | P2 of 12 | P2 of 12 |
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
AllSeasonContact 2
Quatrac Pro 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 2 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
AllSeasonContact 2
Quatrac Pro 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
AllSeasonContact 2
Quatrac Pro 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the Quatrac Pro 2 87% from 3. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | AllSeasonContact 2 | Gap | Quatrac Pro 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.63 | 1.3% | 39.13 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 105.7 | 0.7% | 105 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 46.93 | 2.5% | 45.8 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 77.4 | 0.2% | 77.55 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 13.75 | 1.5% | 13.54 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 84.11 | 2% | 85.49 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 3.01 | 0.9% | 2.97 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 27 | 5.7% | 25.45 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 2,831 | 0.2% | 2,782 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 59.05 | = | 59.05 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 3.48 | 3.9% | 3.61 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| scored | 2.1% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 71.25 | 2.4 dB | 68.9 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 63,950 | 11.2% | 57,500 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 7.67 | 1.9% | 7.8 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| 275 | 23.4% | 359 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac Pro 2 9.4 out of 10.
| AllSeasonContact 2 | Category | Quatrac Pro 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | Dry | 74 | ||
| 94 | Wet | 63 | ||
| 83 | Comfort | 100 | ||
| 74 | Value | - | ||
| 84 | Snow | 96 | ||
| 42 | Ice | - | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| AllSeasonContact 2 | Category | Quatrac Pro 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | Dry Grip | 9.5 | ||
| 8.7 | Wet Grip | 9.5 | ||
| 8 | Road Feedback | 8.3 | ||
| 8 | Handling | 9 | ||
| 7.9 | Wear | 10 | ||
| 8.9 | Comfort | 9.7 | ||
| 8.3 | Snow Grip | 8 | ||
| 7.7 | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the Quatrac Pro 2 87% from 3. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- 83%from 70 reviews
- 82%would buy again
- 667,287 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly overall (81% average), most often praising its smooth, comfortable ride and low noise levels, alongside very strong wet grip that inspires confidence. Dry grip is also widely viewed as secure and predictable, and around one in five owners report it coping well in snow for an all-season. The main recurring drawback is steering feel: around one in four owners describe softer, less immediate response, and tread life feedback is mixed, with a noticeable minority reporting faster-than-expected wear.
- Noticeably smoother, more comfortable ride
- Low cabin noise and a refined drive
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Strong dry grip and traction under acceleration
- Steering feels soft or delayed, with a dead spot for some drivers
- Tread life reports are inconsistent, with some seeing faster wear
- Handling can feel less sharp than expected in the dry
Summarised by AI from 61 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 70 AllSeasonContact 2 reviewsI chose XL-rated tires because I tend to drive a bit faster, and they provide better stability with less sidewall flex. I use them only during the winter, and they've been excellent. They are no noisier than winter tires, and in my experience they perform better in about 90% of winter conditions. The only exception is deep snow, where proper winter tires still have an advantage, although these tires handle it quite well too.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2
- 87%from 3 reviews
- 1,000 milesdriven by reviewers
All 3 Quatrac Pro 2 reviewsA set of two to replace two severely unevenly worn tyres on the front axle. They were the first generation Quatrac Pro with 85,000 km. The Pro 2 is a huge difference compared to (fresh) Pros of the old generation. They are much quieter, all the vibrations and weird cornering noises are gone. The design seems completely new, I have high expectations of it and will post an update in a few thousand km.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 140 sizes of the AllSeasonContact 2 and 43 of the Quatrac Pro 2, 40 of them made in both.
| Category | AllSeasonContact 2 | Quatrac Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 140 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 43 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 40 sizes 205/45 R17205/55 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17215/60 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17225/60 R17215/55 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18and 28 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B98%C2% | A91%B9% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B75%C20%A4%D1% | C78%B17%D4% |
| EU label noise | 70-73 dB B97%A3% | 68-71 dB A87%B13% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 248 of 248 | 46 of 46 |
| On the market since | - | 2026 |
| Replaced | Continental AllSeasonContact (2017) | Vredestein Quatrac Pro (2018) |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best All Season Tyres (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Recommended: Best All Season Tyres for SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: All-Season SUV Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2026/27) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tyre in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 12.8% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Three independent tests put the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 side by side: Auto Bild's 2026 all-season test, its 2026 30-set all-season braking test, and Auto Bild Allrad's 2026 SUV all-season test. The Vredestein placed higher in both Auto Bild rankings, while the two shared second place in the SUV test. The braking test used the same size and braking figures as the full Auto Bild test, so those results do not establish a separate braking trend.
The Vredestein's clearest repeated advantages are shorter wet braking, stronger snow braking and lower pass-by noise. Its snow lead was much larger in Auto Bild's 225/45 R17 test than in the 225/55 R18 SUV test, where the Continental matched it overall and did better in snow traction. The Continental's clearest advantage is projected tread life in the test that measured wear. Neither tyre has a consistent aquaplaning or rolling-resistance lead across the two full tests.
AllSeasonContact 2 vs Quatrac Pro 2: your questions
Is the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 finished ahead 2 times and the AllSeasonContact 2 not once, with one level. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the AllSeasonContact 2 scores 9.5 and the Quatrac Pro 2 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the AllSeasonContact 2 or the Quatrac Pro 2?
The Quatrac Pro 2 led 9 of the 11 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter in the wet across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Quatrac Pro 2 led 3 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.3% shorter in the dry across 3 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Quatrac Pro 2 led 6 of the 8 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.7% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Quatrac Pro 2 was 2.4 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.9/10 for the AllSeasonContact 2 and 9.7/10 for the Quatrac Pro 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews and the Quatrac Pro 2 87% from 3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 12.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The AllSeasonContact 2 is made in 140 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Quatrac Pro 2 in 43 (17 to 22 inch). 40 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the AllSeasonContact 2 is graded B for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Quatrac Pro 2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
10-15 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
2-4 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion