Falken Azenis FK520 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Expect the PS5 to dominate when the road is damp: it sweeps wet braking and handling virtually across the board, and repeatedly scores top-tier mileage. The FK520's appeal centers on day-to-day refinement and cost control-lower noise, stronger value metrics, and competitive dry pace-though its wet margins can be meaningful, especially in emergency braking.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | six |
While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is better than the Falken Azenis FK520 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Competitive dry performance with frequent wins in dry handling
- Lower external noise and good comfort scores
- Strong value: lower purchase price and favorable price/1,000 km
- Respectable efficiency and abrasion for the class
- Class-leading wet performance (braking, handling, aquaplaning)
- Excellent projected mileage and low abrasion
- Balanced, predictable behavior with good safety reserves
- Generally lower rolling resistance than Falken in tests
Dry Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 0.23% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.53% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 0.09% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 5.19% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stopped the vehicle in 6.37% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 2.94% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 2.12% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was 1.48% faster around a wet circle than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Circle: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 floated at a 0.43% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 slipped out at a 7.98% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 scored 12.5% more points than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during five noise tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 measured 2.48% quieter than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.
Best In Noise: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is predicted to cover 16.24% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three value tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 proved to have a 10.93% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.
Best In Value: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three price tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 cost 26.73% less than the Michelin Pilot Sport 5.
Best In Price: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 had a 1.97% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Michelin Pilot Sport 5 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 emitted 9.37% less particle wear matter than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Falken Azenis FK520 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Falken Azenis FK520 delivers excellent dry grip, very strong wet braking/traction, and predictable, progressive handling, while remaining comfortable and relatively quiet. Value for money is a standout, with several users comparing its performance favorably to premium brands, and wear generally viewed as good for a UHP tyre. A minority note that steering precision/feedback isn't as sharp as top-tier UUHP options, and it's not the best choice for track days or prolonged hard driving due to some heat fade. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the performance-to-price ratio.
Based on 37 reviews with an average rating of 84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 overwhelmingly praise its outstanding wet and dry grip, high-speed stability, and refined ride/low noise for everyday use. Many report strong longevity versus rivals (and versus PS4), noting confident braking and aquaplaning resistance, plus an attractive sidewall design. The most common downsides are reduced steering feel/road feedback and a tendency toward mild understeer from its softer sidewalls; a notable minority also report mid-life uneven wear/out-of-round behavior that increases noise. Overall, for road use the PS5 is viewed as a superb all-round UHP tyre that prioritizes safety, comfort, and consistency over razor-sharp track-like response.
Based on 96 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Conclusion
Falken's Azenis FK520 makes a strong value case: quick and precise in the dry, notably quiet, and consistently cheaper to buy. If your driving is predominantly fair-weather, you prioritize cabin refinement, and you want to keep costs down, the FK520 is easy to recommend. For mixed-weather or high-mileage drivers who value wet-road security and longevity above all, the PS5 is the safer, longer-lasting bet-and the clearer overall winner.
Key Differences
- Wet braking: PS5 consistently shorter (e.g., up to ~9.5% shorter in AutoBild Sports Car 2023).
- Wet handling and grip: PS5 quicker on laps and circles across most tests.
- Aquaplaning: PS5 usually ahead in straight and curved; FK520 occasionally strong in straight-line only.
- Dry feel: FK520 often a touch quicker in dry handling; dry braking trades blows with small gaps.
- Noise/refinement: FK520 quieter by ~1-3 dB in several tests; comfort often rates better.
- Longevity and abrasion: PS5 delivers 12-24% higher mileage on average and lower wear rates.
Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.