Dry Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 5.64% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Dry Braking: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.81% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 3.45% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Wet Braking: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.98% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 5.04% faster around a wet circle than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Wet Circle: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 floated at a 0.34% higher speed than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Straight Aqua: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 slipped out at a 4.11% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Turanza 6

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Gravel Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 1.48% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>

Gravel Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 had 5.81% better traction on gravel than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Gravel Traction: Bridgestone Turanza 6

See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>

Sand Traction

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 6.07% better traction in sand than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Sand Traction: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>

Grass Traction

Best In Grass Traction: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during three noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 measured 0.68% quieter than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Noise: Bridgestone Turanza 6

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one wear tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 is predicted to cover 9.82% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Wear: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one value tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 proved to have a 26.44% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Value: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one price tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 cost 18.4% less than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Best In Price: Falken Azenis FK520

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 had a 14.19% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Azenis FK520.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Turanza 6

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>