Falken Azenis FK520 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Across the dataset, Goodyear is the clear front-runner with 10/10 overall test wins, repeatedly topping wet handling/braking, aquaplaning safety, and wear. Falken lands consistent mid-table results with standout moments-very short dry and wet stopping in select sizes, excellent straight aquaplaning in some tests, and notably lower purchase price-creating a compelling value story.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been ten tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | ten |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Falken Azenis FK520 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Strong dry braking; occasionally best-in-test (e.g., 33.2 m vs 34.3 m in SUV size)
- Competitive wet braking/handling in some sizes plus excellent straight aquaplaning in several tests
- Lower purchase price with solid value and good abrasion figures
- Comfortable and quiet for the category
- Dominant wet performance: shorter wet braking and faster wet handling across most tests
- Superior aquaplaning safety, especially on curves
- Outstanding wear and overall lifecycle value with good efficiency
- Refined dynamics: precise steering, balanced handling, low noise
Dry Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.7% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.69% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.41% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 10% more points than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 3.88% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.04% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.38% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 2.74% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had 2.58% higher lateral wet grip than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 0.97% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 5.73% higher speed than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Gravel Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.82% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Gravel Handling winner was calculated >>
Gravel Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 1.61% better traction on gravel than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Gravel Traction: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Gravel Traction winner was calculated >>
Sand Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one sand traction tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 3.08% better traction in sand than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Sand Traction: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Sand Traction winner was calculated >>
Grass Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one grass traction tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 7.43% faster accelerating on grass than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Grass Traction: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Grass Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 scored 5.71% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 0.76% quieter than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 19.82% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 8.87% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four price tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 cost 11.61% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Price: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 2.01% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 emitted 16.58% less particle wear matter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Abrasion: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Falken Azenis FK520 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Falken Azenis FK520 delivers excellent dry grip, very strong wet braking/traction, and predictable, progressive handling, while remaining comfortable and relatively quiet. Value for money is a standout, with several users comparing its performance favorably to premium brands, and wear generally viewed as good for a UHP tyre. A minority note that steering precision/feedback isn't as sharp as top-tier UUHP options, and it's not the best choice for track days or prolonged hard driving due to some heat fade. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the performance-to-price ratio.
Based on 37 reviews with an average rating of 84%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Across 160 driver reviews, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely praised for outstanding dry and wet grip, progressive and predictable handling, strong braking, and a surprisingly comfortable, quiet ride for a UHP tyre. Many users report improved confidence and everyday refinement versus previous tyres (including PS4/PS5, PZ4, and various runflats), with good value for money also noted. Minority complaints focus on faster wear and relatively low new tread depth, increased noise on rough asphalt, and a softer sidewall feel that can dull initial turn-in or feel floaty at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for performance-focused daily use.
Based on 173 reviews with an average rating of 86%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tyres possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Azenis FK520 is the better pick for budget-conscious buyers seeking strong grip without premium pricing. It occasionally stops shorter in the dry and even in the wet in some sizes, shows good straight-line aquaplaning resistance, and keeps noise and comfort respectable. However, it can feel less precise, understeer sooner in the wet, and trails on curved aquaplaning and efficiency, which limits its appeal for enthusiastic or wet-weather-heavy driving.
Bottom line: Goodyear is the complete package for drivers who want no compromises and long life; Falken offers solid, safe performance at a friendlier upfront cost, best suited to everyday use in predominantly dry conditions.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Goodyear wins 10/10 tests; Falken 0
- Wet performance: Goodyear frequently leads wet braking by 4-10% and wet handling by 3-6%
- Aquaplaning: Goodyear notably stronger in curved aquaplaning; Falken sometimes leads straight aquaplaning
- Longevity: Goodyear wear advantage (e.g., +25-41% mileage in multiple tests)
- Efficiency/noise: Goodyear usually lower rolling resistance and slightly quieter
- Price/value split: Falken cheaper upfront; Goodyear higher purchase price but better long-term value
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.