Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
The scoreboard favors Bridgestone in overall rankings (4/4 test wins vs. 0), driven by consistently strong wet-road control and class-leading aquaplaning resistance. Goodyear counters with shorter dry stops in most tests, far superior wear (often 30-45% higher mileage), lower noise, and better value. The result is a clear split: wet-weather assurance vs. cost-per-kilometer efficiency.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | four |
While it might look like the Bridgestone Turanza 6 is better than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) across tests
- Consistently strong wet handling and often shorter wet braking
- Higher overall test placements and balanced wet/dry security
- Competitive efficiency with occasional fuel consumption edge
- Exceptional mileage (+30-45% vs. Bridgestone in tests)
- Lower price and stronger value metrics
- Typically shorter dry braking and low external noise
- Low abrasion and strong sustainability credentials
Dry Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.54% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.09% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.94% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Turanza 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 4.01% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was 0.33% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 had 1.22% higher lateral wet grip than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Turanza 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 floated at a 4.39% higher speed than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Turanza 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 slipped out at a 0.29% higher speed than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three noise tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 measured 1.38% quieter than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Noise: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is predicted to cover 27.84% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Wear: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 proved to have a 29.57% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Value: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two price tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 cost 5.57% less than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Price: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had a 1.76% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza 6 used 1.72% less fuel than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Bridgestone Turanza 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 emitted 28.9% less particle wear matter than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Bridgestone Turanza 6 highly for its excellent wet grip and braking, very low noise levels, comfortable ride, and improved fuel economy, often noting strong aquaplaning resistance and confidence in heavy rain. Dry grip is generally good for a touring tyre, but the softer sidewalls can make steering feel less precise, with some reports of floatiness, understeer, and reduced feedback at higher speeds. A minority mention faster or uneven wear and occasional noise increase over time, but these are not dominant trends. Overall, the Turanza 6 suits drivers prioritizing comfort, quietness, and wet-weather security over sporty handling feel.
Based on 48 reviews with an average rating of 79%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 very highly, praising its exceptional longevity, quiet and comfortable ride, and strong all-round grip with notably low rolling resistance and improved fuel economy. Wet and dry performance are generally confidence-inspiring for touring use, with many reporting excellent safety and aquaplaning resistance. A minority note the tyre's soft sidewalls can make steering feel vague or less sporty and, in some cases, cause tramlining on rutted surfaces; a few also find wet braking weaker than expected. Overall, it's a premium touring tyre focused on comfort, efficiency, and very long life.
Based on 108 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Conclusion
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 shines for everyday running costs: outstanding mileage (often 30-44% more), lower price, and lower rolling resistance/noise in several tests. Its dry braking is marginally shorter in most comparisons, though wet grip can vary by test and it's less secure in deep water than Bridgestone. If you prioritize cost-per-mile and comfort, Goodyear is compelling; if you want maximum wet safety and balanced dynamics, choose Bridgestone. The practical takeaway: rainy climates and motorway spray favor Turanza 6; high-mile drivers and budget-focused owners favor EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Bridgestone ranked higher in all shared tests (4/4).
- Wet safety: Bridgestone leads aquaplaning by ~4-5% in multiple tests and often wins wet handling.
- Dry braking: Goodyear posts marginally shorter dry stops in most sizes (≈0.3-1.4%).
- Longevity: Goodyear delivers substantially higher wear life (+31-44%).
- Value and price: Goodyear is cheaper and scores better value indices.
- Noise/comfort: Goodyear is generally quieter; Bridgestone can be noisier with lower self-damping.
Overall Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Top Comparisons
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.