Menu

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear's EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook's Ventus Prime 4 sit in the same “premium-touring summer” space: tyres aimed at everyday drivers who want confident grip, predictable handling, low noise and strong running costs rather than outright sportiness. With 10 shared professional tests across popular sizes (205/55 R16 through 225/50 R17), this is a well-documented head-to-head.

The data shows a clear personality split. The Hankook often posts the shorter braking numbers (especially in the dry, and frequently in the wet too), and it's usually cheaper to buy. The Goodyear, however, repeatedly counters with markedly stronger longevity, lower rolling resistance, lower noise, and-crucially-more dependable aquaplaning performance, which can matter more than small braking deltas once standing water enters the picture.
EfficientGrip-Performance-2 VS Ventus-Prime-4

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been ten tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of ten total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2six
six wins
Hankook Ventus Prime 4four
four wins

While it might look like the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is better than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Exceptional tread life and low wear: repeatedly +25% to +72% higher predicted mileage in shared tests (e.g., 45,250 vs 26,250 km in 2024 AutoBild; 65,700 vs 42,200 km in 2023 ADAC)
  • Stronger aquaplaning safety margin, especially curved aquaplaning (wins 6/6), supporting more secure behaviour in deeper water
  • Lower rolling resistance and often better efficiency metrics (wins 5/5 rolling resistance; frequently competitive fuel figures), supporting lower running costs
  • Comfort/refinement advantages: generally lower external noise (wins 5/7 noise comparisons) and a consistently “balanced” touring character in test write-ups
  • Consistently short braking distances across sizes, particularly in wet braking (wins 9/10) and dry braking (wins 7/10), often by small but repeatable margins
  • Very competitive purchase price in most datasets (wins 6/6 price comparisons), improving affordability and initial value
  • Strong, confidence-inspiring dry dynamics in several tests, with competitive dry handling results and good grip at the limit
  • Often good wet braking/handling on shallower-water tests, making it feel grippy in typical rain conditions (while not matching Goodyear in deeper-water aquaplaning)

Dry Braking

Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during seven dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stopped the vehicle in 1.32% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
37.06M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
36.57M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36.8M (+1M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
35.8M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36.8M (+1M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
35.8M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36.31M (+0.22M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
36.09M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
37.7M (+1.1M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
36.6M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
37.7M (+1.4M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
36.3M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36.4M (+0.5M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
35.9M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
37.9M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
38.1M (+0.2M)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36.4M (+0.5M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
35.9M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
38.3M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
38.5M (+0.2M)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36.3M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
36.7M (+0.4M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.39% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
53.78s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53.99s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
51.85s (+0.07s)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
51.78s
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
55.7s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
56.2s (+0.5s)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.34% faster around a lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
96.2Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
96.53Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
95Km/H (-1Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
96Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
115.2Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
115.6Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
78.4Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78Km/H (-0.4Km/H)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
90 Points
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
90 Points
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during nine wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stopped the vehicle in 3.08% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
38.94M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
37.74M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
29.7M (+1.9M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
27.8M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
46.4M (+2.9M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
43.5M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
34.34M (+0.22M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
34.12M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
37.4M (+1.6M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
35.8M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
59.6M (+3.6M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
56M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
29.2M (+1.5M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
27.7M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
33.3M (+0.5M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
32.8M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
45.6M (+2.3M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
43.3M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
42.6M (+0.7M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
41.9M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
31.3M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
34.5M (+3.2M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.68% less distance than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
37.47M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
38.9M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
36M (+0.5M)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
35.5M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
38.3M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
39.1M (+0.8M)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
38.1M
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
42.1M (+4M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 2.62% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
84.76s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
87.04s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
84.81s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86.47s (+1.66s)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
84.7s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
87.6s (+2.9s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was 0.22% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
72.07Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72.23Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
74.3Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74.5Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
74.2Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74.3Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
67.7Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67.9Km/H

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
95 Points
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
95 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tyres performed equally well

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
95 Points
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
95 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 1.2% faster around a wet circle than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
11.57s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
11.71s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
11.57s
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
11.71s (+0.14s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 floated at a 0.93% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
79.62Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78.88Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
82.6Km/H (-1.7Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84.3Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
74.98Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73.6Km/H (-1.38Km/H)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
80.3Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77.6Km/H (-2.7Km/H)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
76Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74Km/H (-2Km/H)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
74.9Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74.3Km/H (-0.6Km/H)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
81Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81.3Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
91.5Km/H (-1.5Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
93Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
75.7Km/H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72.9Km/H (-2.8Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during six curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 slipped out at a 7.09% higher speed than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5.08m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
4.72m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
4.54m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
3.98m/sec2 (-0.56m/sec2)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3.4m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
2.81m/sec2 (-0.59m/sec2)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3.5m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
3.2m/sec2 (-0.3m/sec2)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3.1m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
2.7m/sec2 (-0.4m/sec2)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
4.49m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
4.38m/sec2 (-0.11m/sec2)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
13.1m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
12.6m/sec2 (-0.5m/sec2)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
3.4m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
3.4m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
95 Points
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
95 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
95 Points
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
95 Points

Noise

Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five noise tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 measured 0.98% quieter than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
69.87dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70.56dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
68.8dB (+0.2dB)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68.6dB
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
70.8dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72.8dB (+2dB)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
70.6dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71.7dB (+1.1dB)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
64dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
64.7dB (+0.7dB)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
71dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71.6dB (+0.6dB)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
72.3dB
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73.3dB (+1dB)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
71.6dB (+0.4dB)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71.2dB

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 weighed 8.79% less than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
8.3Kg
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
9.1Kg
Tyre Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tyre Weight: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
8.3Kg
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
9.1Kg (+0.8Kg)

Wear

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five wear tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is predicted to cover 29.44% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
57778KM
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
40770KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
51340KM
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
40800KM (-10540KM)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
65700KM
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
42200KM (-23500KM)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
68800KM
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
49900KM (-18900KM)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
45250KM
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
26250KM (-19000KM)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
57800KM
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
44700KM (-13100KM)

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has a 12.27% better value based on dollars per 1000 warranted miles than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
2.43Price/1000
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
2.77Price/1000
Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty, lower is better

Best In Value: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
2.43Price/1000
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
2.77Price/1000 (+0.34Price/1000)

Price

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during six price tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 cost 8.49% less than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
1380.57
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
1263.42
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
535 (+60)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
475
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
96.39 (+17.89)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78.5
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
110 (+21)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
89
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
7000 (+500)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6500
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
167 (+29)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
138
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
375 (+75)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
300

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had a 3.69% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
6.27kg / t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6.51kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
7.1kg / t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7.35kg / t (+0.25kg / t)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
7.52kg / t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
8.36kg / t (+0.84kg / t)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
0.775kg / t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
0.823kg / t (+0.05kg / t)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
7.62kg / t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7.65kg / t (+0.03kg / t)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
8.34kg / t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
8.38kg / t (+0.04kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 used 0.71% less fuel than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5.67l/100km
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
5.63l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5.7l/100km
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
5.8l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5.8l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
5.7l/100km
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5.5l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
5.4l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 emitted 12.97% less particle wear matter than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
58.4mg/km/t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67.1mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
61.3mg/km/t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67.6mg/km/t (+6.3mg/km/t)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
51.9mg/km/t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
58.7mg/km/t (+6.8mg/km/t)
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
62mg/km/t
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75mg/km/t (+13mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Driver Reviews

Across 102 reviews, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is most often praised as a premium touring tyre with outstanding tread life, strong all-round grip, and a noticeably quieter, more comfortable ride than many budget or OEM-fit alternatives. Many drivers also report improved fuel economy/low rolling resistance and consistent day-to-day security in both dry and wet conditions. A smaller but meaningful minority report a soft sidewall feel that makes steering less precise (especially when pushed), and some users experience higher road noise or noise increasing with mileage; wet braking is also described as weaker than top rivals by a subset of reviewers.

Based on 113 reviews with an average rating of 85%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Driver Reviews

Across 71 reviews, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is generally seen as a strong value-focused touring tyre, most often praised for being quiet, smooth and confidence-inspiring with strong dry handling and good wet grip when new. Many drivers also highlight stable braking/handling and an overall “premium feel” for the price compared with more expensive rivals. The most repeated drawback is faster-than-expected wear, with several owners reporting that wet grip (and sometimes noise) deteriorates noticeably as tread depth drops; a smaller but recurring group also finds the ride a bit stiff/harsh on some cars.

Based on 75 reviews with an average rating of 82%

Best Review for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Given 100% 205/55 R16 V on mostly motorways for 1,000 easy going miles
Been looking for new set of summer tyres after decided to change my wheels size too, I went from 17” wheels down to 16” and fitted new set of Goodyear efficient grip performance 2, latest model tyres, they were made in week 7 of 2020 and I fitted them in week 8 of 2020, absolutely brand new and fresh rubber. So far so good, traveled around 1000 miles and tyres are excellent, performance, comfort, even though they are smaller size there is no negative performance, corners great, braking in both dry and wet is good, car feels very positive to drive , noise level also good. This is the first... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1477 - tyre reviewed on March 8, 2020
View all Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Given 100% 205/60 R16 on for 10,000 spirited miles
The new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is perfect tyres in Greek roads.
Helpful 1447 - tyre reviewed on April 1, 2022
View all Hankook Ventus Prime 4 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Across the shared tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 regularly wins the “headline” grip metrics-most notably braking (it takes 7/10 dry braking wins and 9/10 wet braking wins). In several AutoBild and market-overview datasets it stops a touch shorter (often ~1-6% in braking), and it typically undercuts the Goodyear on purchase price by a meaningful margin (e.g., 2024 ADAC price: 138 vs 167; 2023 ADAC: 89 vs 110). If your priority is maximum stopping performance per euro upfront, Hankook's case is easy to understand.

But the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the more complete “owning experience” tyre. It dominates wear in every shared wear test (5/5 wins), often by a large margin-e.g., 2024 AutoBild: 45,250 km vs 26,250 km (+72%); 2026 ADAC: 57,800 km vs 44,700 km (+29%); 2023 ADAC: 65,700 km vs 42,200 km (+56%). It also consistently leads rolling resistance (5/5 wins) and typically noise (5 wins), and it is notably stronger in curved aquaplaning (6/6 wins), a repeated theme echoed by professional comments about the Hankook struggling more in deeper water. This combination explains why Goodyear often ends up higher overall in stricter scoring systems (e.g., 2026 ADAC: 3rd vs 11th), even when it doesn't top every single braking metric.

Practical takeaway: if you're a high-mileage driver or you want the safest, most predictable behaviour when roads are wet with standing water-plus lower long-term cost per kilometre-the Goodyear is the smarter pick despite a higher purchase price. If your driving is mostly urban/commuter with less exposure to heavy rain or motorway water and you want strong braking feel for less money upfront, the Hankook remains a compelling value choice-just be realistic about tread life and water-depth resilience.
Key Differences
  • Longevity is the biggest separator: Goodyear wins all wear comparisons (5/5), sometimes by huge margins (up to ~+72% predicted mileage in 2024 AutoBild).
  • Aquaplaning resilience favours Goodyear, especially in curved aquaplaning (Goodyear 6 wins vs Hankook 0), aligning with comments that Hankook can struggle more in deeper water.
  • Braking performance trends the other way: Hankook wins most dry braking (7/10) and most wet braking (9/10), typically by small single-digit percentages-though 2026 ADAC is a notable exception where Goodyear is clearly better in wet braking (31.3 m vs 34.5 m).
  • Efficiency/running costs: Goodyear leads rolling resistance in every shared rolling-resistance result (5/5) and usually pairs that with lower abrasion; Hankook sometimes edges fuel consumption slightly in ADAC datasets (e.g., 5.4 vs 5.5 l/100 km in 2026 ADAC).
  • Noise/refinement: Goodyear is more often the quieter tyre (5 noise wins) and is frequently described as balanced/comfortable; Hankook is sometimes noted as noisier or average in comfort depending on the test.
  • Overall rankings vary by scoring philosophy: in strict safety/environment weighting (e.g., 2026 ADAC 3rd vs 11th) Goodyear's balanced safety + eco metrics lift it, while in some mixed-criteria comparisons Hankook can place higher on grip/value emphasis (e.g., 2024 Motorhome test: Hankook 3rd vs Goodyear 5th).
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Overall Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tyre.

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tyre.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.