2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test

It's the 50th anniversary of the ADAC tyre test, and to celebrate the German automotive body have tested fifty summer tyres in the popular 205/55 R16 tyre size, and have included wear testing for every tyre!

There's a lot to unpack in this test, so we'll dive straight in! Headline notes, there are two Michelin tyres in this test, the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the energy saving Michelin e.Primacy, the Continental on test is not the new PremiumContact 7, it's the previous model, the Continental PremiumContact 6, and Continental also have the new Continental UltraContact in the test which is meant to be a lower rolling resistance and higher mileage tyre for those who drive a lot of distance!

Wear

Wear is a key quality of any tyre - what good is a tyre that has amazing grip if it only lasts a few thousand miles?! Road wear testing is incredibly expensive, and with 50 sets of tyres on test ADAC had to split the tyres between road and machine wearing with control tyres between the two to ensure data correlation. 

As usual, Michelin led the wear test, but not with the tyre you'd expect. The Michelin e.Primacy, which starts with lower than average tread depth and is designed for very low fuel use (more on that later) recorded a staggering estimated 71,500kms tread life! 

The second best tyre was the impressive Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 which once again highlights the longevity of modern Goodyear products, and the low wearing Michelin Primacy 4+ was just beaten to third by the budget Doublecoin DC99. This also happens to be the best result for the Doublecoin, keep an eye on it later in the test.

Of the known brand names, it was a disappointing result for Uniroyal, Nokian and Dunlop, all projected to have less than half the miles of the best.

The advantage of having the prices of the tyres and estimated mileage, you can get an idea of the value of the tyres, based in Euros Per 1000km to see how much you get for your money.

As the Doublecoin was one of the best wearing AND one of the cheapest, it offered exceptional value, but we still wouldn't recommend fitting it unless you're really into sliding around. Of the good tyres on test, it was again the Goodyear and Michelin offering great cost per mile, but the Kumho Ecsta HS52 was up there in the mix too.

Wet

Often wear comes at the expense of wet grip, but once again Goodyear and Michelin (with the Primacy 4+ at least) are proving to break that trend. ADAC only published their wet braking data, of which they use two surfaces, asphalt and concrete. This is where the Michelin, Goodyear and Continental stretch their legs, but it was also a good grip result for the Cooper, Hankook and ESA Tecar on both surfaces.

Straight aquaplaning was led by Uniroyal, with the Doublecoin and Michelin e.Primacy struggling. You can read the result of curved aquaplaning in the results table below.

Dry

Continental once again led the way in dry braking, narrowly beating out the Hankook and Michelin e.Primacy.

Environment

As the environmental impact of all industry is becoming ever more important, the big tyre tests are now measuring "abrasion" which is how much rubber, measured in weight, the tyre loses. While a high mileage tyre should lead in this category, it isn't always a straight correlation as the tyres have different amounts of material in them.

The best in test was the e.Primacy, and ignoring the budget Michelin also did very well with the Primacy 4+, but Continentals new high mileage tyre, the UltraContact, also performed extremely well.

Fuel consumption was measured in a real world test rather than a machine rolling resistance test, and, well, there was a disappointingly small range of results. The total spread was 5.5 litres per 100km to 5.9 litres per 100km.

Given the relatively small real world advantage a tyre like the e.Primacy has in this test over a tyre like the Bridgestone Turanza T005, but the large disadvantage it has in wet grip, it makes me wonder if ultra low rolling resistance tyres are really the correct choice for anyone.

Finally external noise was measured, but for the sake of avoiding another long chart, you can find the data below. The e.Primacy was impressively quiet, and the Petlas impressively loud!

Results

You can find the full results below, with some of the testers notes on key tyres. If you want to see the full test we strongly suggest you learn German and head over to the ADAC website here.

View Results as a single table and adjust the score weighting

1st: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: B/A/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 13th +1.8 M 95.23% Wet Braking 11th +3 M 91.98% Wet Braking - Concrete 5th +0.8 M 97.78% Straight Aqua 27th -6.4 Km/H 92.62% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 15th +1.5 dB 97.88% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 2nd -5800 Km 91.89% Value 8th +0.64 Price/1000 61.68% Price 44th +65 40.91% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 5th +26.5 mg/km/t 56.77% Very balanced, good on dry and wet roads, good environmental record, very high mileage (top grade), efficient. None mentioned. Driving safety: The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. It offers the driver decent feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, shows itself to be safe at the limit and boasts an above-average braking distance on dry roads. On wet roads, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 shines in braking distance measurements and wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. Only when it comes to aquaplaning behavior does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scores with above-average mileage in the wear test and low abrasion. The efficiency is also impressive thanks to the low tire weight and low fuel consumption. When it comes to noise, the Goodyear performs satisfactorily. Read Reviews    Buy from £56.59
2nd: Continental Premium Contact 6
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 1st 100% Wet Braking 1st 100% Wet Braking - Concrete 1st 100% Straight Aqua 27th -6.4 Km/H 92.62% Curved Aquaplaning 33rd -0.7 m/sec2 82.5% Noise 33rd +2.3 dB 96.78% Tyre Weight 36th +1.3 Kg 85.39% Wear 6th -21800 Km 69.51% Value 32nd +1.28 Price/1000 44.59% Price 48th +70 39.13% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 10th +34.7 mg/km/t 50.07% Very balanced, high driving safety (top mark), good on dry and wet roads (top marks), high mileage. Weaknesses in efficiency. Driving safety: The Continental PremiumContact 6 is impressive across the board and secured the top mark in the test for driving safety. It offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, shows itself to be safe at the limit and claims the shortest braking distance in the test. This means that its performance on dry roads is clearly rated as good. But the Continental also shines with its performance on wet roads and also secured the top mark in the test here. It delivers the shortest braking distances in the test and is absolutely safe and easy to control over the wet handling course. Only when it comes to aquaplaning does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating. Environmental balance: In terms of the environmental balance, the PremiumContact 6 just missed out on a good rating. In the wear test, it delivers a good predicted mileage and its abrasion is also low, in terms of efficiency it just misses a good rating due to the tyre weight. When it comes to noise, it also performs satisfactorily. Read Reviews    Buy from £68.99
3rd: Michelin Primacy 4+
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 5th +1 M 97.29% Wet Braking 6th +2.3 M 93.73% Wet Braking - Concrete 11th +2.5 M 93.37% Straight Aqua 7th -3.2 Km/H 96.31% Curved Aquaplaning 14th -0.4 m/sec2 90% Noise 12th +1.4 dB 98.01% Tyre Weight 26th +1 Kg 88.37% Wear 4th -10200 Km 85.73% Value 16th +0.93 Price/1000 52.55% Price 49th +75 37.5% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 4th +18.9 mg/km/t 64.8% Very balanced, good on dry and wet roads, good environmental record, very high mileage (top grade.) None mentioned. Driving safety: The Michelin Primacy 4+ secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Michelin already offers the driver only satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on a dry road, but still shows itself to be safe in the limit area. Its braking distance is classified as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Michelin gets good ratings in terms of braking distance measurements, aquaplaning behavior and handling. This makes it very balanced on wet roads. It offers good grip and safe driving characteristics. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Primacy 4+ secures the second best rating in the test (best: Michelin e.Primacy). Its predicted mileage is classified as very good and its abrasion is also low. Read Reviews    Buy from £85.35
4th: Bridgestone Turanza T005
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: B/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 9th +1.4 M 96.25% Wet Braking 12th +3.3 M 91.25% Wet Braking - Concrete 19th +3.9 M 90.03% Straight Aqua 8th -3.9 Km/H 95.5% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 44th +3.2 dB 95.57% Tyre Weight 3rd +0.1 Kg 98.7% Wear 17th -31100 Km 56.5% Value 43rd +1.72 Price/1000 37.45% Price 46th +66 40.54% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 15th +38.5 mg/km/t 47.48% Balanced, good on dry and wet roads, good environmental balance, high efficiency (top mark.) None mentioned. Driving safety: The Bridgestone Turanza T005 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Bridgestone Turanza T005 offers the driver decent feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, shows itself to be safe at the limit and boasts a short braking distance on dry roads. On wet roads, the Bridgestone excels in braking distance measurements, longitudinal aquaplaning and wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. Only when aquaplaning transversely does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating. Environmental balance: The Bridgestone Turanza T005 achieves a good result in the environmental balance. It shines in terms of efficiency thanks to its low weight and fuel consumption, but its predicted mileage is rated as just good. Read Reviews    Buy from £57.19
5th: Nokian WetProof
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/68	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 14th +1.9 M 94.97% Wet Braking 3rd +1.4 M 96.09% Wet Braking - Concrete 8th +2.1 M 94.37% Straight Aqua 2nd -2.1 Km/H 97.58% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 15th +1.5 dB 97.88% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 31st -36000 Km 49.65% Value 34th +1.42 Price/1000 42.04% Price 30th +42 51.72% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 41st +56.1 mg/km/t 38.28% Balanced, good on dry and wet roads, efficient. Weakness in the environmental balance, weaknesses in mileage and abrasion, slight weaknesses in sustainability. Driving safety: The Nokian Wetproof impresses with its driving characteristics and thus secures a good rating for driving safety. It offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, is absolutely safe at the limit and also impresses with short braking distances on dry roads. Overall, its performance on dry roads is clearly rated as good. But the Nokian also offers good properties on wet roads. It has good ratings for braking distance measurements, longitudinal aquaplaning and handling. Only in lateral aquaplaning does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating. Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the Wetproof does not get more than a satisfactory rating. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as only satisfactory in relation to the test field. Thanks to the low tire weight and low fuel consumption, however, it achieves a good rating for efficiency. Read Reviews    Buy from £53.79
6th: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/67	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 11th +1.5 M 95.99% Wet Braking 7th +2.4 M 93.48% Wet Braking - Concrete 4th +0.6 M 98.32% Straight Aqua 33rd -7 Km/H 91.93% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 42nd +2.8 dB 96.11% Tyre Weight 40th +1.4 Kg 84.44% Wear 15th -30700 Km 57.06% Value 25th +1.15 Price/1000 47.25% Price 33rd +44 50.56% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 22nd +40.9 mg/km/t 45.97% Balanced, good on wet and dry roads (top mark.) Slight weaknesses in the environmental balance, weakness in efficiency, weaknesses in sustainability. Driving safety: The Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN sets the bar high on dry roads and also secures a good rating on wet roads, which leads to a good assessment of driving safety. The Falken secured the top mark in the test on dry roads. It offers the driver exemplary feedback on the steering wheel, is absolutely safe at the limit and also impresses with a short braking distance. The Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN also gets a good rating on wet roads. It gets good ratings for braking distance measurements, lateral aquaplaning and wet handling. The test car can be driven safely and easily controlled over the course. Only in lateral aquaplaning does it not get beyond a satisfactory rating. Environmental balance: When it comes to the environmental balance, the ZIEX ZE310 does not get more than a satisfactory result. It does get good ratings for its predicted mileage and abrasion, but since it's quite heavy in comparison, it doesn't get more than a satisfactory rating for efficiency. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in Turkey does not go beyond an adequate assessment. Read Reviews    Buy from £49.69
7th: Continental UltraContact
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: B/A/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 7th +1.2 M 96.77% Wet Braking 16th +3.9 M 89.82% Wet Braking - Concrete 16th +3.5 M 90.96% Straight Aqua 46th -10.2 Km/H 88.24% Curved Aquaplaning 46th -1.1 m/sec2 72.5% Noise 23rd +1.9 dB 97.32% Tyre Weight 9th +0.6 Kg 92.68% Wear 5th -15600 Km 78.18% Value 20th +0.99 Price/1000 50.99% Price 47th +68 39.82% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 3rd +17.7 mg/km/t 66.29% Balanced, good on dry roads, good environmental record, very high mileage. Slight weakness on wet roads. Driving safety: The Continental UltraContact is rated as just satisfactory when it comes to driving safety. The UltraContact offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on a dry road, but is still safe at the limit. Thanks to its short braking distance, it can still secure a good overall rating on dry roads. On wet roads, however, the UltraContact does not get more than a satisfactory rating. Although it scores in the braking distance measurements and also in handling with good grip and safe driving characteristics, it falters when it comes to aquaplaning. In the case of longitudinal aquaplaning, he does not get more than a satisfactory result, and in the case of transverse aquaplaning, even more than an adequate result. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the UltraContact secures one of the best results in the test. His predicted mileage is classified as very good, and he only just misses a very good rating for wear. The tire also scores with its low weight and low fuel consumption. Read Reviews    Buy from £89.00
8th: Kumho Ecsta HS52
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 3rd +0.8 M 97.82% Wet Braking 17th +4 M 89.58% Wet Braking - Concrete 9th +2.4 M 93.62% Straight Aqua 13th -4.8 Km/H 94.46% Curved Aquaplaning 33rd -0.7 m/sec2 82.5% Noise 23rd +1.9 dB 97.32% Tyre Weight 41st +1.5 Kg 83.52% Wear 12th -28000 Km 60.84% Value 13th +0.86 Price/1000 54.5% Price 24th +37 54.88% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 29th +44.5 mg/km/t 43.88% Balanced, good on dry and wet roads. Slight weaknesses in the environmental balance, weaknesses in efficiency, weaknesses in sustainability. Driving safety: The Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The HS52 offers the driver only satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, but is still safe at the limit. Its braking distance is classified as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores in the braking distance measurements, longitudinal aquaplaning and wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. However, its transverse aquaplaning behavior is only rated as satisfactory. Overall, the Kumho secured a good rating for wet performance. Environmental balance: When it comes to the environmental balance, the Kumho does not get more than a satisfactory result. Although it scores in terms of predicted mileage and abrasion, but offers only satisfactory efficiency due to the higher tire weight. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in China is rated as sufficient. Read Reviews    Buy from £59.00
9th: Hankook Ventus Prime 4
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 2nd +0.7 M 98.09% Wet Braking 3rd +1.4 M 96.09% Wet Braking - Concrete 2nd +0.3 M 99.15% Straight Aqua 43rd -9.1 Km/H 89.5% Curved Aquaplaning 39th -0.8 m/sec2 80% Noise 38th +2.6 dB 96.37% Tyre Weight 41st +1.5 Kg 83.52% Wear 13th -29300 Km 59.02% Value 22nd +1.08 Price/1000 48.82% Price 33rd +44 50.56% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 8th +32.8 mg/km/t 51.48% Balanced, good on dry and wet roads. Slight weakness when aquaplaning, slight weaknesses in the environmental balance, weaknesses in efficiency. Driving safety: The Hankook Ventus Prime4 secured a good overall rating for driving safety. The Ventus Prime 4 offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, but is still safe at the limit. Its braking distance is classified as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores in braking distance measurements and in wet handling with good grip and safe drivability. However, its aquaplaning behavior is only rated as satisfactory. Overall, the Hankook secured a good rating for wet performance. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Ventus Prime4 gets a good rating for the predicted mileage and for its abrasion. In terms of efficiency, on the other hand, it loses out due to its relatively high weight. All in all, it does not go beyond a satisfactory result in terms of the environmental balance. Read Reviews
10th: Nexen N Fera Primus
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 19th +2.3 M 93.98% Wet Braking 15th +3.8 M 90.05% Wet Braking - Concrete 12th +2.7 M 92.88% Straight Aqua 4th -2.2 Km/H 97.46% Curved Aquaplaning 8th -0.3 m/sec2 92.5% Noise 18th +1.6 dB 97.74% Tyre Weight 19th +0.8 Kg 90.48% Wear 38th -38200 Km 46.57% Value 39th +1.55 Price/1000 39.92% Price 27th +41 52.33% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 40th +53.3 mg/km/t 39.5% Balanced, good on dry and wet roads. Weakness in the environmental balance, weaknesses in mileage, slight weaknesses in sustainability. Driving Safety: The Nexen N'Fera Primus secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Nexen offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and is still safe even at the limit. In addition, its braking distance is rated as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the N'Fera Primus gets good ratings for both braking distance measurements and aquaplaning behavior. In terms of handling, the Nexen just missed out on a good rating. All in all, it is still enough for a good assessment of the wet performance. Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the Nexen does not get more than a satisfactory result. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as satisfactory. Read Reviews
11th: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 32nd +3.6 M 90.89% Wet Braking 22nd +5.8 M 85.57% Wet Braking - Concrete 25th +4.9 M 87.78% Straight Aqua 5th -2.6 Km/H 97% Curved Aquaplaning 8th -0.3 m/sec2 92.5% Noise 23rd +1.9 dB 97.32% Tyre Weight 36th +1.3 Kg 85.39% Wear 33rd -36400 Km 49.09% Value 28th +1.22 Price/1000 45.78% Price 21st +34 56.96% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 38th +52.2 mg/km/t 40% Good on dry and wet roads. Not quite balanced, weaknesses in the environmental balance, relatively low mileage (devaluation), significant weakness in sustainability. Driving safety: The Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 secures an overall good rating for driving safety. The Kenda offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and is also safe at the limit. In addition, its braking distance is rated as good compared to the test field. On wet roads, the Kenetica Pro KR210 missed a good rating in the braking distance measurements, but was able to secure good marks in aquaplaning behavior and handling. All in all, it is enough for a still good assessment of the wet performance. Environmental balance: When it comes to the environmental balance, the Kenda does not get beyond a satisfactory result. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as satisfactory. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in Taiwan is rated as sufficient. Read Reviews
12th: Kleber Dynaxer HP4
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/68	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 9th +1.4 M 96.25% Wet Braking 22nd +5.8 M 85.57% Wet Braking - Concrete 24th +4.3 M 89.11% Straight Aqua 19th -5.4 Km/H 93.77% Curved Aquaplaning 8th -0.3 m/sec2 92.5% Noise 8th +1.2 dB 98.29% Tyre Weight 34th +1.2 Kg 86.36% Wear 7th -23500 Km 67.13% Value 11th +0.8 Price/1000 56.28% Price 31st +43 51.14% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 6th +28.7 mg/km/t 54.8% Good for the environmental balance, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency. Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads. Driving Safety: The driving safety of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not go beyond a satisfactory rating. It offers the driver only average feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and could prove to be a bit more stable during dynamic evasive maneuvers. Its braking distance is still classified as good, but overall it just misses out on a good rating on dry roads. On wet roads, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 does not get more than a satisfactory rating either. Although it scored well in the aquaplaning tests, it only performed satisfactorily in the braking distance measurements and handling. It lacks a bit of grip and precision for a better rating. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Dynaxer HP4 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. The tire also scores with its low fuel consumption, but it just misses out on a good rating in terms of weight. Read Reviews    Buy from £67.25
13th: Fulda EcoControl HP2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 17th +2.1 M 94.47% Wet Braking 26th +6.4 M 84.31% Wet Braking - Concrete 31st +5.9 M 85.64% Straight Aqua 23rd -5.9 Km/H 93.19% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd -0.2 m/sec2 95% Noise 30th +2.1 dB 97.05% Tyre Weight 5th +0.3 Kg 96.2% Wear 8th -24000 Km 66.43% Value 13th +0.86 Price/1000 54.5% Price 35th +45 50% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 11th +35.3 mg/km/t 49.64% Good for the environment, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency. Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads. Driving safety: The Fulda EcoControl HP2 can get a good rating on dry roads, but it does not get more than a satisfactory rating in the wet and thus overall driving safety. Overall, the Fulda still achieves a good rating on dry roads. Although it only offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel, it is still safe at the limit. Its braking distance is also classified as clearly good compared to the test field. The EcoControl HP2 misses out on a good rating on wet roads. Although it can show good results in aquaplaning behavior, it does not get more than a satisfactory rating in wet braking and handling. It offers a medium level of grip and can only satisfactorily combine longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the EcoControl HP2 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. In addition, it can also get a good result with its low fuel consumption and low weight in terms of efficiency. Read Reviews    Buy from £57.99
14th: Toyo Proxes Comfort
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 14th +1.9 M 94.97% Wet Braking 25th +6.2 M 84.73% Wet Braking - Concrete 17th +3.6 M 90.72% Straight Aqua 40th -8.4 Km/H 90.31% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 10th +1.3 dB 98.15% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 14th -29800 Km 58.32% Value 19th +0.98 Price/1000 51.24% Price 26th +39 53.57% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 25th +41.1 mg/km/t 45.85% Still good on dry roads, good environmental balance. Not quite balanced, slight weakness on wet roads (devaluation), significant weakness in sustainability Driving safety: The Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort just missed out on a good result when it came to driving safety. The Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort offers the driver only average feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, but still shows itself to be safe in the limit area. Thanks to its short braking distance, the Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort just about got a good rating for dry performance. The Toyo Tires Proxes Comfort narrowly missed out on a good rating on wet roads. Its performance is rated as satisfactory for both braking distance and aquaplaning measurements. In wet handling he still gets good ratings, but overall that's not enough to get a good result in the wet. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Proxes Comfort secured a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. In addition, it can also get a good result with its low fuel consumption and low weight in terms of efficiency. In terms of sustainability, the tire produced in Japan does not go beyond a sufficient result. Read Reviews    Buy from £46.23
15th: Debica Presto HP 2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/B/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 28th +3.5 M 91.12% Wet Braking 33rd +7.4 M 82.3% Wet Braking - Concrete 34th +6.5 M 84.41% Straight Aqua 12th -4.6 Km/H 94.69% Curved Aquaplaning 2nd -0.1 m/sec2 97.5% Noise 28th +2 dB 97.19% Tyre Weight 8th +0.5 Kg 93.83% Wear 10th -25800 Km 63.92% Value 10th +0.74 Price/1000 58.19% Price 23rd +36 55.56% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 19th +39.2 mg/km/t 47.03% Good environmental record, good for mileage, abrasion and efficiency. Not quite balanced, weakness on wet roads. Driving safety: The Debica Presto HP 2 does not get more than a satisfactory rating in either dry or wet conditions and therefore also overall in terms of driving safety. The Debica offers the driver only satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, so that it is difficult to set the steering angle required for the curve right away. But its handling at the limit is only classified as satisfactory. After all, he can get a good rating for the braking distance. On wet roads, the Debica Presto HP 2 does not get more than a satisfactory rating either. Although the tire received good ratings for its aquaplaning behavior, its properties in braking tests and handling were only rated as satisfactory. It offers a medium level of grip and can only satisfactorily combine longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental balance: In the environmental balance, the Presto HP 2 secures a good result in the test. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are rated as good. In addition, it can also get a good result with its fuel consumption and low weight in terms of efficiency. Read Reviews    Buy from £60.19
16th: Dunlop Sport BluResponse
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: B/A/68	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 14th +1.9 M 94.97% Wet Braking 31st +7.1 M 82.89% Wet Braking - Concrete 26th +5 M 87.56% Straight Aqua 9th -4.2 Km/H 95.16% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd -0.2 m/sec2 95% Noise 39th +2.7 dB 96.24% Tyre Weight 3rd +0.1 Kg 98.7% Wear 28th -34600 Km 51.61% Value 47th +1.95 Price/1000 34.56% Price 44th +65 40.91% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 32nd +45.4 mg/km/t 43.39% Read Reviews    Buy from £57.29
17th: Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 6th +1.1 M 97.03% Wet Braking 24th +5.9 M 85.36% Wet Braking - Concrete 19th +3.9 M 90.03% Straight Aqua 15th -4.9 Km/H 94.35% Curved Aquaplaning 8th -0.3 m/sec2 92.5% Noise 12th +1.4 dB 98.01% Tyre Weight 29th +1.1 Kg 87.36% Wear 21st -32000 Km 55.24% Value 42nd +1.68 Price/1000 38.01% Price 43rd +62 42.06% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 36th +47.3 mg/km/t 42.39% Good on dry roads, still good for mileage and efficiency. Not quite balanced, weaknesses on wet roads, weaknesses in the environmental balance, slight weakness in abrasion (devaluation.) Driving safety: The Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 is rated as just satisfactory in terms of driving safety due to its wet properties. The Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 offers the driver good feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads, can be steered precisely and is safe even at the limit. In addition, it can score with its short braking distance and thus secures a good rating for dry performance. On wet roads, however, the Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 does not go beyond a satisfactory verdict. Although it scored well in the aquaplaning tests and secured good ratings, it was only satisfactory in the braking distance measurements and handling. It offers a medium level of grip and can only satisfactorily combine longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental balance: The Cinturato P7 C2 also missed out on a good result in terms of the environmental balance. His predicted mileage is still rated as good, but he does not get more than a satisfactory result when it comes to abrasion. It doesn't help that its fuel consumption and weight are rated as good. Read Reviews    Buy from £72.49
18th: Sava Intensa HP2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 19th +2.3 M 93.98% Wet Braking 27th +6.5 M 84.11% Wet Braking - Concrete 30th +5.7 M 86.06% Straight Aqua 19th -5.4 Km/H 93.77% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd -0.2 m/sec2 95% Noise 34th +2.4 dB 96.64% Tyre Weight 6th +0.4 Kg 95% Wear 23rd -32900 Km 53.99% Value 27th +1.2 Price/1000 46.19% Price 27th +41 52.33% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 34th +46.6 mg/km/t 42.75% Read Reviews    Buy from £56.49
19th: Semperit Speed Life 3
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 36th +3.8 M 90.43% Wet Braking 10th +2.8 M 92.47% Wet Braking - Concrete 3rd +0.5 M 98.6% Straight Aqua 15th -4.9 Km/H 94.35% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd -0.2 m/sec2 95% Noise 18th +1.6 dB 97.74% Tyre Weight 22nd +0.9 Kg 89.41% Wear 18th -31500 Km 55.94% Value 30th +1.25 Price/1000 45.18% Price 38th +46 49.45% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 29th +44.5 mg/km/t 43.88% Read Reviews    Buy from £66.89
20th: Firestone RoadHawk
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 18th +2.2 M 94.23% Wet Braking 32nd +7.3 M 82.49% Wet Braking - Concrete 28th +5.4 M 86.7% Straight Aqua 6th -3.1 Km/H 96.42% Curved Aquaplaning 3rd -0.2 m/sec2 95% Noise 47th +3.3 dB 95.44% Tyre Weight 1st 100% Wear 25th -33300 Km 53.43% Value 31st +1.27 Price/1000 44.78% Price 31st +43 51.14% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 9th +33.9 mg/km/t 50.66% Read Reviews    Buy from £53.79
21st: BFGoodrich Advantage
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 8th +1.3 M 96.51% Wet Braking 21st +5.4 M 86.43% Wet Braking - Concrete 18th +3.8 M 90.26% Straight Aqua 19th -5.4 Km/H 93.77% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 44th +3.2 dB 95.57% Tyre Weight 29th +1.1 Kg 87.36% Wear 27th -34200 Km 52.17% Value 38th +1.54 Price/1000 40.08% Price 40th +51 46.88% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 12th +36.4 mg/km/t 48.88% Read Reviews    Buy from £67.49
22nd: GT Radial FE2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 28th +3.5 M 91.12% Wet Braking 28th +6.7 M 83.7% Wet Braking - Concrete 32nd +6.1 M 85.23% Straight Aqua 17th -5.2 Km/H 94% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 36th +2.5 dB 96.51% Tyre Weight 29th +1.1 Kg 87.36% Wear 33rd -36400 Km 49.09% Value 17th +0.96 Price/1000 51.76% Price 10th +25 64.29% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 37th +49 mg/km/t 41.53% Read Reviews    Buy from £69.62
23rd: ESA Tecar Spirit Pro
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 32nd +3.6 M 90.89% Wet Braking 5th +1.9 M 94.77% Wet Braking - Concrete 6th +1 M 97.24% Straight Aqua 17th -5.2 Km/H 94% Curved Aquaplaning 14th -0.4 m/sec2 90% Noise 23rd +1.9 dB 97.32% Tyre Weight 19th +0.8 Kg 90.48% Wear 10th -25800 Km 63.92% Value 3rd +0.44 Price/1000 70.07% Price 6th +22 67.16% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 21st +39.5 mg/km/t 46.84% Read Reviews
24th: Barum Bravuris 5HM
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 47th +5.1 M 87.56% Wet Braking 29th +7 M 83.09% Wet Braking - Concrete 35th +6.7 M 84.01% Straight Aqua 26th -6.3 Km/H 92.73% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 47th +3.3 dB 95.44% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 30th -35500 Km 50.35% Value 33rd +1.36 Price/1000 43.1% Price 27th +41 52.33% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 35th +46.9 mg/km/t 42.59% Read Reviews    Buy from £59.79
25th: Viking Protech Newgen
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 43rd +4.4 M 89.08% Wet Braking 40th +9.8 M 77.83% Wet Braking - Concrete 33rd +6.3 M 84.82% Straight Aqua 31st -6.7 Km/H 92.27% Curved Aquaplaning 14th -0.4 m/sec2 90% Noise 15th +1.5 dB 97.88% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 18th -31500 Km 55.94% Value 18th +0.97 Price/1000 51.5% Price 22nd +35 56.25% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 27th +43.4 mg/km/t 44.5% Read Reviews    Buy from £50.99
26th: Norauto Prevensys 4
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 23rd +3.1 M 92.05% Wet Braking 9th +2.5 M 93.22% Wet Braking - Concrete 12th +2.7 M 92.88% Straight Aqua 27th -6.4 Km/H 92.62% Curved Aquaplaning 8th -0.3 m/sec2 92.5% Noise 6th +1 dB 98.57% Tyre Weight 22nd +0.9 Kg 89.41% Wear 31st -36000 Km 49.65% Value 11th +0.8 Price/1000 56.28% Price 5th +20 69.23% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 44th +59.5 mg/km/t 36.9% Read Reviews
27th: Apollo Alnac 4g
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/C/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 26th +3.4 M 91.35% Wet Braking 34th +7.8 M 81.52% Wet Braking - Concrete 28th +5.4 M 86.7% Straight Aqua 13th -4.8 Km/H 94.46% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 30th +2.1 dB 97.05% Tyre Weight 19th +0.8 Kg 90.48% Wear 44th -41800 Km 41.54% Value 48th +2 Price/1000 33.99% Price 35th +45 50% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 39th +52.5 mg/km/t 39.86% Read Reviews    Buy from £53.23
28th: General Altimax One S
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 41st +4.3 M 89.3% Wet Braking 39th +9.5 M 78.36% Wet Braking - Concrete 38th +8.1 M 81.29% Straight Aqua 41st -8.6 Km/H 90.08% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 10th +1.3 dB 98.15% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 15th -30700 Km 57.06% Value 6th +0.54 Price/1000 65.61% Price 3rd +19 70.31% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 22nd +40.9 mg/km/t 45.97% Read Reviews    Buy from £63.99
29th: Giti GitiSynergyH2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 28th +3.5 M 91.12% Wet Braking 36th +9.1 M 79.08% Wet Braking - Concrete 38th +8.1 M 81.29% Straight Aqua 10th -4.3 Km/H 95.04% Curved Aquaplaning 14th -0.4 m/sec2 90% Noise 39th +2.7 dB 96.24% Tyre Weight 36th +1.3 Kg 85.39% Wear 23rd -32900 Km 53.99% Value 15th +0.91 Price/1000 53.09% Price 16th +30 60% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 33rd +45.8 mg/km/t 43.18% Read Reviews
30th: Petlas Imperium PT515
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 26th +3.4 M 91.35% Wet Braking 37th +9.2 M 78.9% Wet Braking - Concrete 37th +7.9 M 81.67% Straight Aqua 35th -7.4 Km/H 91.46% Curved Aquaplaning 33rd -0.7 m/sec2 82.5% Noise 50th +4.5 dB 93.89% Tyre Weight 46th +1.6 Kg 82.61% Wear 8th -24000 Km 66.43% Value 4th +0.53 Price/1000 66.03% Price 14th +29 60.81% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 14th +37.8 mg/km/t 47.93% Read Reviews
31st: Uniroyal RainSport 5
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 24th +3.2 M 91.82% Wet Braking 7th +2.4 M 93.48% Wet Braking - Concrete 7th +1.1 M 96.97% Straight Aqua 1st 100% Curved Aquaplaning 1st 100% Noise 22nd +1.8 dB 97.46% Tyre Weight 22nd +0.9 Kg 89.41% Wear 38th -38200 Km 46.57% Value 44th +1.73 Price/1000 37.32% Price 39th +47 48.91% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 43rd +58.4 mg/km/t 37.34% Good on wet roads. Less balanced, significant weaknesses on dry roads (devaluation), weakness in environmental performance and sustainability, low mileage, high fuel consumption. Driving safety: The Uniroyal RainSport 5 is only rated as satisfactory for driving safety due to its dry properties. The RainSport 5 only offers the driver sufficient feedback on the steering wheel on a dry road and also receives an adequate rating for its handling at the limit - in the event of sudden evasive maneuvers, the test car tends to oversteer with the tires, but skilful steering maneuvers can prevent skidding. When it comes to the braking distance, the Uniroyal can secure a good mark with a short value. Overall, its drying properties are classified as satisfactory. On wet roads, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 receives very good ratings for its aquaplaning behavior, for its braking performance and its behavior in wet handling, thanks to good grip and safe and precise driveability, good reviews. Overall, the overall wet performance is rated as good. Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 is also clearly rated as satisfactory. Both its predicted mileage and its abrasion are classified as satisfactory. The efficiency is still rated as good thanks to the relatively low fuel consumption and weight. Read Reviews    Buy from £49.99
32nd: Hifly HF201
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/C/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 37th +3.9 M 90.2% Wet Braking 42nd +10.1 M 77.3% Wet Braking - Concrete 36th +7.7 M 82.05% Straight Aqua 37th -7.5 Km/H 91.35% Curved Aquaplaning 40th -0.9 m/sec2 77.5% Noise 8th +1.2 dB 98.29% Tyre Weight 26th +1 Kg 88.37% Wear 22nd -32400 Km 54.69% Value 7th +0.61 Price/1000 62.8% Price 3rd +19 70.31% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 17th +38.8 mg/km/t 47.28% Read Reviews
33rd: Cooper Zeon CS8
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/A/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 21st +2.7 M 93.01% Wet Braking 2nd +0.6 M 98.29% Wet Braking - Concrete 9th +2.4 M 93.62% Straight Aqua 22nd -5.8 Km/H 93.31% Curved Aquaplaning 33rd -0.7 m/sec2 82.5% Noise 7th +1.1 dB 98.43% Tyre Weight 49th +2 Kg 79.17% Wear 42nd -40000 Km 44.06% Value 40th +1.6 Price/1000 39.16% Price 25th +38 54.22% Fuel Consumption 43rd +0.4 l/100km 93.22% Abrasion 47th +62.9 mg/km/t 35.62% Read Reviews    Buy from £54.59
34th: Westlake Z 107
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 24th +3.2 M 91.82% Wet Braking 29th +7 M 83.09% Wet Braking - Concrete 15th +3.2 M 91.67% Straight Aqua 2nd -2.1 Km/H 97.58% Curved Aquaplaning 8th -0.3 m/sec2 92.5% Noise 34th +2.4 dB 96.64% Tyre Weight 26th +1 Kg 88.37% Wear 46th -44400 Km 37.9% Value 41st +1.66 Price/1000 38.29% Price 13th +28 61.64% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 42nd +57.4 mg/km/t 37.74% Read Reviews    Buy from £45.00
35th: Minerva Radial 209
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/B/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 45th +4.9 M 87.99% Wet Braking 43rd +10.9 M 75.94% Wet Braking - Concrete 45th +9.6 M 78.57% Straight Aqua 30th -6.6 Km/H 92.39% Curved Aquaplaning 30th -0.6 m/sec2 85% Noise 30th +2.1 dB 97.05% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 35th -36900 Km 48.39% Value 24th +1.11 Price/1000 48.13% Price 14th +29 60.81% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 17th +38.8 mg/km/t 47.28% Read Reviews
36th: King Meiler Sport 1 KM
205/55 R16 91V	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 35th +3.7 M 90.66% Wet Braking 35th +8.7 M 79.81% Wet Braking - Concrete 40th +8.2 M 81.11% Straight Aqua 32nd -6.8 Km/H 92.16% Curved Aquaplaning 40th -0.9 m/sec2 77.5% Noise 28th +2 dB 97.19% Tyre Weight 34th +1.2 Kg 86.36% Wear 28th -34600 Km 51.61% Value 21st +1 Price/1000 50.74% Price 16th +30 60% Fuel Consumption 1st 100% Abrasion 28th +44.1 mg/km/t 44.11% Read Reviews
37th: Tomket Sport 3 Series 3
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 22nd +2.9 M 92.53% Wet Braking 41st +9.9 M 77.65% Wet Braking - Concrete 44th +9.2 M 79.28% Straight Aqua 44th -9.4 Km/H 89.16% Curved Aquaplaning 40th -0.9 m/sec2 77.5% Noise 36th +2.5 dB 96.51% Tyre Weight 1st 100% Wear 42nd -40000 Km 44.06% Value 23rd +1.1 Price/1000 48.36% Price 6th +22 67.16% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 22nd +40.9 mg/km/t 45.97% Read Reviews
38th: Michelin e.Primacy
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: A/B/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 3rd +0.8 M 97.82% Wet Braking 38th +9.3 M 78.72% Wet Braking - Concrete 41st +8.6 M 80.37% Straight Aqua 48th -13.9 Km/H 83.97% Curved Aquaplaning 48th -1.2 m/sec2 70% Noise 2nd +0.7 dB 99% Tyre Weight 6th +0.4 Kg 95% Wear 1st 100% Value 9th +0.7 Price/1000 59.54% Price 50th +79 36.29% Fuel Consumption 1st 100% Abrasion 1st 100% Very good environmental balance, best sustainability, very high mileage (top grade), very little abrasion (top mark), light and very economical (top mark) Unbalanced, weaknesses on dry and particularly wet roads (devaluation.) Driving safety: The Michelin e.Primacy is rated as sufficient for driving safety due to its wet performance. The Michelin e.Primacy offers the driver satisfactory feedback on the steering wheel on dry roads and does not get more than a satisfactory rating when driving at the limit. When it comes to the braking distance, however, the tire scores well and even gets a good rating for it. All in all, however, it does not get more than a satisfactory result in terms of dry performance. On wet roads, the e.Primacy shows clear weaknesses compared to the test field. Its braking, aquaplaning and handling performance is rated as only adequate. The tire can only moderately combine longitudinal and lateral forces, which means that the test car can only be controlled imprecisely and in the limit area with great difficulty. Overall, the wet performance is rated as sufficient. Environmental balance: In terms of environmental balance, the e.Primacy sets the standard in the test field. It offers a very high predicted mileage, gets a very good rating for the lowest wear and also scores points in terms of efficiency with very low fuel consumption and low tire weight. The Michelin e.Primacy also sets the bar high when it comes to sustainability and is the only tire that just barely misses a good rating. It offers a very high predicted mileage, gets a very good rating for the lowest wear and also scores points in terms of efficiency with very low fuel consumption and low tire weight. The Michelin e.Primacy also sets the bar high when it comes to sustainability and is the only tire that just barely misses a good rating. It offers a very high predicted mileage, gets a very good rating for the lowest wear and also scores points in terms of efficiency with very low fuel consumption and low tire weight. The Michelin e.Primacy also sets the bar high when it comes to sustainability and is the only tire that just barely misses a good rating. Read Reviews    Buy from £76.89
39th: Laufenn S Fit EQ+
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 12th +1.7 M 95.48% Wet Braking 20th +5.1 M 87.09% Wet Braking - Concrete 21st +4.1 M 89.57% Straight Aqua 41st -8.6 Km/H 90.08% Curved Aquaplaning 30th -0.6 m/sec2 85% Noise 23rd +1.9 dB 97.32% Tyre Weight 9th +0.6 Kg 92.68% Wear 48th -46200 Km 35.38% Value 46th +1.93 Price/1000 34.8% Price 16th +30 60% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 46th +62 mg/km/t 35.95% Read Reviews
40th: Delinte DH2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: B/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 32nd +3.6 M 90.89% Wet Braking 14th +3.7 M 90.29% Wet Braking - Concrete 14th +2.8 M 92.63% Straight Aqua 45th -9.5 Km/H 89.04% Curved Aquaplaning 49th -1.3 m/sec2 67.5% Noise 1st 100% Tyre Weight 29th +1.1 Kg 87.36% Wear 45th -44000 Km 38.46% Value 36th +1.52 Price/1000 40.39% Price 10th +25 64.29% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 45th +61.3 mg/km/t 36.21% Read Reviews
41st: Zeetex ZT1000
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: E/C/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 39th +4 M 89.97% Wet Braking 18th +4.6 M 88.21% Wet Braking - Concrete 21st +4.1 M 89.57% Straight Aqua 35th -7.4 Km/H 91.46% Curved Aquaplaning 40th -0.9 m/sec2 77.5% Noise 2nd +0.7 dB 99% Tyre Weight 29th +1.1 Kg 87.36% Wear 50th -48400 Km 32.31% Value 49th +2.26 Price/1000 31.31% Price 19th +31 59.21% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 49th +77.8 mg/km/t 30.91% Read Reviews
42nd: Avon ZV7
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/A/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 28th +3.5 M 91.12% Wet Braking 13th +3.6 M 90.53% Wet Braking - Concrete 21st +4.1 M 89.57% Straight Aqua 10th -4.3 Km/H 95.04% Curved Aquaplaning 30th -0.6 m/sec2 85% Noise 39th +2.7 dB 96.24% Tyre Weight 47th +1.7 Kg 81.72% Wear 49th -47500 Km 33.57% Value 50th +2.72 Price/1000 27.47% Price 35th +45 50% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 50th +91.2 mg/km/t 27.62% Read Reviews    Buy from £51.99
43rd: Radar RPX800
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/A/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 44th +4.6 M 88.64% Wet Braking 19th +4.7 M 87.98% Wet Braking - Concrete 27th +5.3 M 86.91% Straight Aqua 39th -7.7 Km/H 91.12% Curved Aquaplaning 45th -1 m/sec2 75% Noise 4th +0.8 dB 98.86% Tyre Weight 36th +1.3 Kg 85.39% Wear 46th -44400 Km 37.9% Value 35th +1.44 Price/1000 41.7% Price 6th +22 67.16% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 48th +66.2 mg/km/t 34.46% Read Reviews    Buy from £41.27
44th: Rotalla RH01 E Pace
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/B/69	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 40th +4.2 M 89.53% Wet Braking 44th +11.5 M 74.95% Wet Braking - Concrete 43rd +9 M 79.64% Straight Aqua 23rd -5.9 Km/H 93.19% Curved Aquaplaning 33rd -0.7 m/sec2 82.5% Noise 18th +1.6 dB 97.74% Tyre Weight 22nd +0.9 Kg 89.41% Wear 41st -38600 Km 46.01% Value 26th +1.16 Price/1000 47.03% Price 12th +27 62.5% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 15th +38.5 mg/km/t 47.48% Read Reviews
45th: Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1 G2
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 45th +4.9 M 87.99% Wet Braking 48th +19.6 M 63.7% Wet Braking - Concrete 47th +13.8 M 71.84% Straight Aqua 47th -11.7 Km/H 86.51% Curved Aquaplaning 40th -0.9 m/sec2 77.5% Noise 21st +1.7 dB 97.6% Tyre Weight 41st +1.5 Kg 83.52% Wear 38th -38200 Km 46.57% Value 4th +0.53 Price/1000 66.03% Price 2nd +7 86.54% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 31st +45.2 mg/km/t 43.5% Read Reviews
46th: Lassa DriveWays
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: B/B/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 41st +4.3 M 89.3% Wet Braking 45th +12 M 74.14% Wet Braking - Concrete 42nd +8.9 M 79.82% Straight Aqua 25th -6 Km/H 93.08% Curved Aquaplaning 33rd -0.7 m/sec2 82.5% Noise 44th +3.2 dB 95.57% Tyre Weight 41st +1.5 Kg 83.52% Wear 36th -37800 Km 47.13% Value 45th +1.88 Price/1000 35.4% Price 41st +53 45.92% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 26th +41.3 mg/km/t 45.73% Read Reviews    Buy from £66.00
47th: Evergreen DynaComfort EH226
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/C/68	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 48th +5.5 M 86.71% Wet Braking 47th +16.5 M 67.58% Wet Braking - Concrete 48th +14.5 M 70.82% Straight Aqua 37th -7.5 Km/H 91.35% Curved Aquaplaning 19th -0.5 m/sec2 87.5% Noise 12th +1.4 dB 98.01% Tyre Weight 41st +1.5 Kg 83.52% Wear 18th -31500 Km 55.94% Value 36th +1.52 Price/1000 40.39% Price 42nd +57 44.12% Fuel Consumption 28th +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 13th +37.4 mg/km/t 48.2% Read Reviews
48th: Riken Road Performance
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/C/71	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 37th +3.9 M 90.2% Wet Braking 46th +14 M 71.07% Wet Braking - Concrete 46th +10.5 M 77.02% Straight Aqua 34th -7.1 Km/H 91.81% Curved Aquaplaning 14th -0.4 m/sec2 90% Noise 43rd +3 dB 95.84% Tyre Weight 11th +0.7 Kg 91.57% Wear 36th -37800 Km 47.13% Value 29th +1.23 Price/1000 45.58% Price 19th +31 59.21% Fuel Consumption 10th +0.2 l/100km 96.49% Abrasion 7th +32.2 mg/km/t 51.94% Read Reviews    Buy from £62.93
49th: Double Coin DC99
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: C/C/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 49th +6.6 M 84.47% Wet Braking 50th +24.9 M 58.01% Wet Braking - Concrete 50th +23.2 M 60.27% Straight Aqua 50th -16.4 Km/H 81.08% Curved Aquaplaning 49th -1.3 m/sec2 67.5% Noise 5th +0.9 dB 98.71% Tyre Weight 47th +1.7 Kg 81.72% Wear 3rd -6700 Km 90.63% Value 1st 100% Price 6th +22 67.16% Fuel Consumption 3rd +0.1 l/100km 98.21% Abrasion 2nd +11.1 mg/km/t 75.82% Read Reviews
50th: Premiorri Solazo
205/55 R16 91V EU Label: D/B/70	Test # Difference % Dry Braking 50th +7 M 83.68% Wet Braking 49th +23.7 M 59.21% Wet Braking - Concrete 49th +21.9 M 61.65% Straight Aqua 49th -15.4 Km/H 82.24% Curved Aquaplaning 47th -1.2 m/sec2 70% Noise 49th +3.4 dB 95.31% Tyre Weight 50th +2.3 Kg 76.77% Wear 26th -34200 Km 52.17% Value 2nd +0.18 Price/1000 85.12% Price 1st 100% Fuel Consumption 42nd +0.3 l/100km 94.83% Abrasion 19th +39.2 mg/km/t 47.03% Read Reviews